KUVVET ANTRENMANININ 12-14 YAŞ GRUBU ERKEK TENİSÇİLERİN BAZI MOTORİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı 8 haftalık kuvvet antrenmanlarının 12-14 yaş grubu erkek tenisçilerin motorik özelliklerine etkisini incelemekti. Çalışmaya 12-14 yaş grubunda 20 gönüllü Ankara Tenis Kulübü sporcusu denek olarak katılmıştır. Deney grubu n=10, Yaş:13.10±0.87 yıl, Boy:152.90±4.22 cm, Vücut Ağırlığı:40.64±5.72 kg 8 hafta boyunca tenis antrenmanına ve kuvvet antrenmanı, kontrol grubu n=10, Yaş:13.10±0.87 yıl, Boy:152.30±4.73 cm, Vücut Ağırlığı:39.35±3.62 kg ise sadece tenis antrenmanı yapmıştır. Deney ve kontrol gruplarının antrenman periyodu öncesi ön test ve sonrasında son test motorik özellikleri ölçülmüştür. Verilerin istatistiki analizinde kovaryans analizi kullanılmış, ön test ölçümleri ko-değişken olarak tanımlanmış ve deney ve kontrol gruplarının son test ölçümleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Yaş ve spor yaşı bağımsız gruplarda t testi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Anlamlılık düzeyi 0.05 kabul edilmiştir. Deney ve kontrol grubunun boy ve vücut ağırlığı arasında anlamlı bir değişim gözlenmemiştir p>0.05 . Deney ve kontrol grubunun zirve güç, relatif zirve güç, ortalama güç ve yorgunluk indeksi değerleri arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır p>0.05 . Deney ve kontrol grubunun relatif ortalama güçleri arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur p0.05 , deney grubunun 10 m sprint süresi kontrol grubunun 10 m sprint süresine göre kısalmıştır p

Keywords

• Tenis,Erkek ergen,Kuvvet antrenmanı,Motorik özellikler

THE EFFECT OF STRENGTH TRAINING ON SOME MOTOR ABILITIES IN 12- 14 YEARS-OLD MALE TENNIS PLAYERS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine effect of 8-week strength training on motor abilities of male tennis players between aged 12-14 years. The total 20 athletes which played in the Club of Ankara Tennis participated in the study, as experimental group n=10, Age:13.10±0.87 years, Height:152.90±4.22 cm, Body mass:40.64±5.72 kg and control group n=10, Age:13.10±0.87 yıl, Height:152.30±4.73 cm, Body mass:39.35±3.62 kg . The experimental group performed the strength training for 8 weeks in addition to tennis training. The control group performed only tennis training. The motor abilities were measured before the strength training period pre-test and after the strength training post-test for the experimental and control group. The results of pre-test of experimental and control group were defined as a co-variance and the difference between post-tests of variables was compared in univariate co-variance analysis. The difference between some performance variables of experimental and control groups was determined by using independent t test. The level of significance was set at p≤0.05. There was no significant difference between heights of the experimental and control group and their body weights p>0.05 . There were no significant difference between results of peak power, mean power and fatique index of Wingate test performed by the experimental and control group p>0.05 . There was significant difference between the result of relative mean power of Wingate test performed by the experimental and control group p0.05 , there was significant difference between those of 10-m sprint durations p

Keywords

• Tennis,Male adolescent,Strength training,Motor abilities

References

1. Groppel, J., DiNubile, N. Tennis: for the health of it Phys Sportsmed. Jun;37(2):40-50, 2009.
2. Girard, O., Millet, G.P. Physical determinants of tennis performance in competitive teenage players. J Strength Cond Res. Sep 23(6):1867-72, 2009.
3. Deschenes, M.R., Maresh, C.M., Crivello, J.F., Armstrong, L.E., Kraemer, W.J. & Covault, J. The effects of exercise training of different intensities on neuromuscular junction morphology. J. Neurocytol., 22(8), 603- 615.1993.
4. Hakkinen, K., Pakarinen, A. & Kallinen, M. Neuromuscular adaptations and serum hormones in women during short term intensive strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol., 64(2), 106-111, 1992.
5. Ruther, C.L., Golden, C.L., Harris, R.T. & Dudley, G.A. Hypertrophy resistance training and the nature of skeletal muscle activation. J Strength Cond. Res. 9(3), 155-159, 1995.
6. Malina, R.M., Bouchard, C.G. Maturation, and Physical activity. Human Kinetics, USA 49-63, 1991.
7. Malina, R.M., Bouchard, C., and Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. 2nd ed. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics), 114, 2004.
8. Doré, E., Martin, R., Ratel, S., Duché, P., Bedu, M., Van Praagh, E. Gender differences in peak muscle performance during growth. Int J Sports Med. May;26(4):274-80. 2005.

9. Froberg, K., and Lammert. O. Development of muscle strength during childhood. In The child and adolescent athlete (London: Blackwell Publishing Company), 28, 1996.
10. Ingle, L., Sleap, M., Tolfrey, K. The effect of a complex training and detraining programme on selected strength and power variables in early pubertal boys. Journal of Sports Sciences, September 24(9): 987 – 997, 2006.
11. Ramsay, J.A., Bilimkie, C.J.R., Smith, K., Garner, S., Macdougall, J.D., Sale, D.G. Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci in Sports and Exerc, 22(5):605-614, 1990.
12. Omzun, J.C., Mikesky, A.E., Surburg, P.R. Neuromuscular adaptations following prepubescent strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:510-4, 1994.
13. Bompa, T.O. Sporda Çabuk Kuvvet Antrenmanı. Ankara, Bağırgan Yayınevi, 16, 2001.
14. Faigenbaum, A.D., Wescott, W.L., Loud, R.L., Long, C. The Effecets of different resistance training protocols on muscular strenght and endurance development in children. Pediatrics. 104(1):1-7, 1999.
15. Bozkurt, S. İstanbul Bölgesi 13-14 Yaş Grubu Lisanslı Futbolculara Uygulanan Motorik ve Futbol Beceri Testleri, İstanbul, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, 72-74. 2000.
16. Bompa, T.O. Antrenman Kuramı ve Yöntemi. Ankara, Bağırgan Yayınevi, 36-41 402-405 444-451, 1998.
17. Behm, D.G., Faigenbaum, A.D., Falk, B., & Klentrou, P. Canadian society for exercise physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 33: 547– 561, 2008.
18. Blimkie, C.J.R. Resistance training during prand early puberty: efficiacy, trainability, mechanisms, and persistance. Can J Sport Sci 17:14 264-267, 1992.
19. Beunen, G., Malina, R.M. Growth and physcial performance relative to the timing of the adolescent spurt. Newyork, Ed: Pandlf KB, Sport Science Rewiews, Macmillan Publishing Campany 503, 1988.
20. Seger, J.Y., Thorstensson, A. Muscle strenght and electromyogram in boys and girls followed through Puberty. Eur Appl Physiol, 81: 54-61, 2000.
21. Faigenbaum, A.D., Westcott, W.L., Micheli, L.J., Outerbridge, A.R., Long, C.J., Loud, R.L., Zaichkowsky, L.D. The Effect of strenght training and detraining on children. J Strength Cond. Res. 10(2):109-114, 1996.
22. Benck, J., Damsgard, R., Saekmose, A., Jorgensen, P., Jorgensen, K., Klausen, K. Anaerobic Power and muscle strength characteristic of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastic, team handball, tennis and swimming. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 12:171-78, 2002.