BESYO ÖZEL YETENEK SINAVINA GİREN GENÇLERİN, YAPTIKLARI SPOR DALLARINA GÖRE ANTROPOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Abstract

Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu BESYO özel yetenek sınavına giren adayların, genel profillerinin belirlenmesi ve yaptıkları spor dallarına göre antropometrik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmaya 17-28 yaşlarında 304 genç katılmıştır. Erkek: n: 216, yaş: 20.76 ± 2.18 yıl, boy: 174.40 ± 6.46 cm, vücut ağırlığı VA : 66.18 ± 7.20 kg, Kadın: n: 88, yaş: 20.19 ± 2.18 yıl, boy: 161.24 ± 5.83cm, VA: 52.39 ± 5.59 kg; . Sınava giriş sırasına göre ölçümleri yapılan adayların çeşitli anatomik bölgelerinin uzunluk, çevre, çap ve deri kıvrımı kalınlığı ölçümleri kaydedilmiştir. Dataların analizi için SPSS 11.0 paket programında aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, tek yönlü varyans one-way ANOVA analizi, farkı meydana getiren grubun belirlenmesi için ise Tukey testi kullanılmış, güven aralığı 0.05 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Düzenli olarak yaptıkları spor dallarına göre gruplara ayrılan adayların tek yönlü varyans analizi sonucuna göre erkeklerde; boy, VA, çevre ölçümlerinden; bel, kalça, baldır, ayak bileği, uzunluk ölçümlerinden; uyluk, baldır, ayak, derialtı yağ ölçümlerinden; abdominal deri kıvrımı DK ve vücut yağ yüzdesi VYY gibi parametrelerde gruplar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı p

Keywords

• Spor, Antropometri, Morfoloji.

COMPARISON OF ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS IN SUBJECTS APPLIED FOR DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determined of general profile of young subjects and compared the anthropometrıc characteristics and body composition of different sports groups who entering special skills examination for Physical Education and Sports High School. 304 subjets 88 female, 216 male were participated in this study Male: age: 20.76 ± 2.18 years, height: 174.40 ± 6.46 cm, weight: 66.18 ± 7.20 kg, Female: age: 20.19 ± 2.18 years, height: 161.24 ± 5.83 cm, weight: 52.39 ± 5.59 kg . Various anthropometric measurements diameters, circumferences and skinfold thickness were taken from which different anthropometric indices were calculated body mass index, Scelic index and Grant index . For data analysis, SPSS 11.0 packet pragramme was used. The comparisons were made using One-way ANOVA test. The level of significance was set at p

Keywords

• Sports,Anthropometry,Morphology

References

1. Aiwa, N., Pieter W. “Sexual Dimorphism in Body Composition Indices in Martial Arts Athletes”. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity, 56-64. 2007.
2. Bandyopadhyay, A. “Anthropometry and Body Composition in Soccer and Volleyball Players in West Bengal, India”. J Physiol Anthropol 26(4): 501–505, 2007.
3. Chumlea, W C., Wisemandle, W., Guo, SS., Siervogel, RM. “Relations Between Frame Size and Body Composition and Bone Mineral Status. Am J Clin Nutr ;75:1012–6. 2002.
4. Driskell, JA., Wolinsky, I. Nutritional Assessment of Athletes. CRC Pres. sf. 115. 2002.
5. Fox, EL., Bowers, RW., Foss, ML. The Physiological Basic of Physical Education and Athletics. 4. ed. London: Sounders College Pub. 1988.
6. Frisancho, AR. New Standards of Weight and Body Composition by Frame Size and Height for Assessment of Nutritional Status of Adults and the Elderly. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 40: 808-819. 1984.
7. Giampietro, M., Pujia, A., Bertini, I., “Anthropometric Features and Body Composition of Young Athletes Practicing Karate at a High and Medium Competitive Level”. Acta Diabetol. 40: 145–S148. 2003.
8. Greene, JJ., McGuine, TA., Leverson, G., Best, TM. “Anthropometric and Performance Measures for High School Basketball Players”. Journal of Athletic Training. 33(3): 229-232. 1998.

9. Heyward, VH. Advanced Fitness Assessment & Exercise Prescription. 2. ed. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books. 1991.
10. Kerr, DA., Stewart, AD. Body Composition in Sports. Applied Anatomy and Biomechanics in Sports. Edit: Ackland TR., Elliott BC., Bloomfield, J. 2. Edition, Chapt. 5. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 67-81. 2008.
11. Lagua, RT., Cloudio VS. Nutrition and Diet Therapy Reference Dictionary. 4. Edith. New-York: Chapman&Hall. 1996.
12. MacLaren, D. Court Games: “Volleyball and Basketball. Physiology of Sports”. Editörs: Reilly, T., Secher, N., Snell, P., Williams, C. London: E& F Spon. Sf:430-442. 1990.
13. Malousarisa, GG., Bergelesa, NK., Barzoukaa, KG., Bayiosa, IA., Nassisb, GP., Koskolou, MD. “Somatotype, Size and Body Composition of Competitive Female Volleyball Players”. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 11, 337-344. 2008.
14. McArdle, WD., Katch, FI., Katch, VL. Essentials of Exercise Physiology. 2. Ed. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2000.
15. Noorul, HR., Pieter, W., Erie, ZZ. “Physical Fitness of Recreational Adolescent Taekwondo Athletes”. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity. 230-240. 2008.
16. Norton, K., Whittinghan, N., Cardes, L., Kerr, D., Gore, C., Marfell-Jones, M. Measurement Techniques in Anthropometry. Anthropometrica: A Textbook of Body Measurement for Sport and Health Courses. Edith. Norton, K., Olds, T. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. 44-56. 1996.
17. Norton, K., Olds T., Olive S., Craig, N. Anthropometry and Sports Performance. Anthropometrica: A Textbook of Body Measurement for Sport and Health Courses. Edith. Norton, K., Olds, T. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. 350. 1996.
18. Ross, WD., Marfell-Jones, MJ. “Kinanthropometry. Physiological Testing of the High-Performance Athlete”. Ed. MacDougall, JD., Wenger, HA., Gren, HJ. 2. Edith. Illinois, Human Kinetics Books. 1991.
19. Ross, WD., De Rosa EH., Ward, R. “Anthropometry” The Olympic Book of Sports Medicine. Edit. Dirix, A. Knuttgen, H.G., Tittel, K. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Pub., 233-267. 1991.
20. Sports Medicine Manual. International Olimpic Committee. Hurford Enterprises Ltd. sf. 37-39.1990.
21. Tsunawake, N., Tahara, Y., Moji, K., Muraki, S., Minowa, K., Yukawa, K. “Body Composition and Physical Fitness of Female Volleyball and Basketball Players of the Japan Inter-high School Championship Teams”. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 22 (4): 195–201, 2003.