KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN POZİTİF VE NEGATİF DUYGULAR İÇİN ÖNGÖRÜSEL GEÇERLİLİĞİNDE CİNSİYET FARKLILIKLARI

Year 2025, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 262 - 277, 31.08.2025

Hakan Güler , Kadir Yıldız , Serdar Tok

https://doi.org/10.61962/bsd.1727174

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, kişilik özelliklerinin olumlu ve olumsuz duygu durumları üzerindeki yordayıcı gücünün cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığı incelenmiştir. Nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden betimsel ve ilişkisel tarama modelleri kullanılmıştır. Örneklem, Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören 200 kadın ve 200 erkek öğrenciden oluşmuştur. Veriler, “Duygu Durumu Ölçeği” ve “Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri (Kısa Form)” ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular, olumlu duygu durumu ile dışadönüklük, öz-denetim/sorumluluk ve gelişime açıklık arasında; olumsuz duygu durumu ile ise yumuşak başlılık/ geçimlilik arasında anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Cinsiyete özgü yapılan analizlerde, kadınlarda olumsuz duygu durumu ile öz-denetim/sorumluluk ve gelişime açıklık arasında anlamlı ilişkiler gözlemlenmiştir. En dikkat çekici bulgu ise, erkeklerde olumsuz duygu durumu ile duygusal tutarsızlık arasında negatif yönlü orta düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken, kadınlarda bu ilişkinin pozitif yönlü ve düşük düzeyde olmasıdır. Olumlu duygu durumu ile kişilik özellikleri arasında pozitif ve orta düzeyde anlamlı ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir (r = .47, r² = .20); dışadönüklük ve öz-denetim en güçlü yordayıcılardır. Kadın katılımcılarda olumsuz duygu durumu ile kişilik özellikleri arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmuş (r = .38, r² = .12) ve duygusal tutarsızlık başta olmak üzere dışadönüklük ve öz-denetim belirleyici olmuştur. Erkeklerde de benzer düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki gözlenmiş (r = .35, r² = .12) ve duygusal tutarsızlık olumsuz duygu durumunun en güçlü yordayıcısı olarak öne çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak, kişilik özellikleri duygu durumlarının anlamlı olarak yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu tespit edilen ilişkiler cinsiyete göre farklılık göstermektedir. Bulgular, bireylerin duygu durumlarının değerlendirilmesinde kişilik özelliklerinin dikkate alınmasının önemine işaret etmektedir. Sonuçlar, olumlu ve olumsuz duygu durumlarının anlaşılmasında kişilik özelliklerinin temel belirleyiciler olduğunu ve bu ilişkinin cinsiyet bağlamında farklı örüntüler sergileyebileceğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Beş Faktör Kişilik , Duygu Durumu , Cinsiyet Farklılıkları , Duygusal Tutarsızlık , Olumlu ve Olumsuz Duygular

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF PERSONALITY TRAITS FOR POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EMOTIONS

Abstract

This study explored whether the impact of personality traits on positive and negative emotional states differs by gender. Employing descriptive and correlational survey models, the research used quantitative methods. The sample consisted of 200 female and 200 male students from the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Manisa Celal Bayar University. Data were gathered through the “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)” and the “Five Factor Personality Inventory (Short Form).” The findings demonstrated significant relationships between positive mood and the traits of extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to improvement, while a connection was found between negative mood and mildness/aggressiveness. In gender-specific analyses, significant associations were observed between negative mood and conscientiousness as well as openness to improvement among female participants. A particularly noteworthy finding revealed a negative and moderately significant relationship between negative mood and emotional inconsistency in males; in contrast, this relationship was positive yet weak in females. Additionally, positive mood showed positive and moderately significant correlations with personality traits (r= .47, r² = .20), with extraversion and conscientiousness identified as the strongest predictors. For female participants, there existed a significant relationship between negative mood and personality traits (r = .38, r² = .12), where extraversion and conscientiousness, especially emotional inconsistency, emerged as key predictors. Similarly, a significant relationship was found in male participants (r = .35, r² = .12), with neuroticism identified as the strongest predictor of negative affect. In summary, the results suggest that personality traits have a significant influence on emotional states, although these relationships vary by gender. The findings underscore the importance of considering personality traits in the assessment of individuals' affective states. The results indicate that personality traits are fundamental determinants in understanding both positive and negative affect, and that this relationship may exhibit different patterns depending on gender.

Keywords

Five Factor Personality , Mood , Gender Differences , Emotional Inconsistency , Positive and Negative Emotions

References

• 1. Dang T., Du W., Niu M., Xu Z. (2025). The effects of personality traits on learning engagement among college students: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Frontiers in Psychology. 15, 1476437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1476437
• 2. Kring AM., Gordon AH. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(3), 686–703.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686
• 3. Borhan N. (2023). A review study about gender differences in expressive language: Spoken and written language differences. Gelişim ve Psikoloji Dergisi. 29(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.51503/gpd.1231592
• 4. Kulsum ZA., Sinha A. (2023). Gender stereotypes, societal pressure, and emotional expression among men. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. 11(3), 2078–2085. https://doi.org/10.25215/1103.194
• 5. Weisberg YJ., DeYoung CG., Hirsh JB. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology. 2, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
• 6. Palidis DJ., Fellows LK. (2024). The affective response to positive performance feedback is associated with motor learning. Experimental Brain Research. 242(12), 2737–2747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06931-7
• 7. Selvaratnam V., Potwarka L. (2023). Using neurophysiological research methods to understand sport consumer emotions. International Journal of Sport Management. 24(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2023.2183015
• 8. Costa PT., McCrae RR. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
• 9. Knöbel S., Weinberg H., Heilmann F., Lautenbach F. (2024). The interaction between acute emotional states and executive functions in youth elite soccer players. Frontiers in Psychology. 15, 1348079.
• 10. Costa PT., Jr Terracciano A., McCrae RR. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 81(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
• 11. Tarhan N. (2016). Psychology of emotions and emotional zeka. Timaş Publications.
• 12. Goleman D., Boyatzis R. (2017). Emotional intelligence has 12 elements. Which do you need to work on? Harvard Business Review. 84(2), 1–5.
• 13. Servaas MN., Van Der Velde J., Costafreda SG., Horton P., Ormel J., Riese H., Aleman A. (2013). Neuroticism and the brain: a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies investigating emotion processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 37(8), 1518-1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002
• 14. Chang J., Liu X., Xue S., Qiu J. (2024). An amygdala-centered effective connectivity network in trait anxiety. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 18(2), 324-330.
• 15. Dong J., Xiao T., Xu Q., Liang F., Gu S., Wang F., Huang JH. (2022). Anxious personality traits: Perspectives from basic emotions and neurotransmitters. Brain Sciences. 12(9), 1141.
• 16. Tatar A. (2016). Development of the short form of the five-factor personality inventory. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 17, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.202977
• 17. Goldin PR., McRae K., Ramel W., Gross JJ. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry. 63(6), 577–586.
• 18. Morris AS., Silk JS., Steinberg L., Myers SS., Robinson LR. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development. 16(2), 361–388.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.
• 19. Barańczuk U. (2019). The five factor model of personality and emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 139, 217–227.
• 20. Matsumoto D., Yoo SH., Nakagawa S., the Multinational Study of Cultural Display Rules Team. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94(6), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925
• 21. Rose AJ., Carlson W., Waller EM. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socio-emotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology. 43(4), 1019–1031.https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019
• 22. Kumar VV., Tankha G. (2023). Association between the Big Five and trait emotional intelligence among college students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 16, 915–925.https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S400058
• 23. Watson D., Clark LA. (1992). Affectivity, personality, and emotional self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin. 96(3), 465–490.
• 24. Costa PT., McCrae RR. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 38(4), 668–678.
• 25. Bukhari R., Khanam SJ. (2014). Relationship of emotional intelligence and big five personality dimensions among university students. Pakistan Journal of Psychology. 45(1), 85–97.
• 26. Fuente J., Sander P., Umerenkova AG., Urien B., Pachón-Basallo M., Ortiz LE. (2024). The big five factors as differential predictors of self-regulation, achievement emotions, coping, and health behavior in undergraduate students. BMC Psychology. 12, 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01768-9
• 27. Jensen-Campbell LA., Graziano WG. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality. 69(2), 323–362.
• 28. McCrae RR., Costa Jr, PT. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and social psychology bulletin. 17(2), 227-232.
• 29. Ng W., Diener E. (2009). Personality differences in emotions: Does emotion regulation play a role?. Journal of Individual Differences. 30(2), 100-106.
• 30. Yang X., Wu H., Song Y., Chen S., Ge H., Yan Z., Chen J. (2023). Functional MRI specific alterations in frontoparietal network in mild cognitive impairment: An ALE meta analysis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 15, 116590.
• 31. Watson D., Clark LA., Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
• 32. Taber KS. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. 48, 1273-1296.
• 33. Margolis S., Stapley AL., Lyubomirsky S. (2020). The association between extraversion and well‐being is limited to one facet. Journal of Personality. 88(3), 478-484.
• 34. Jacques-Hamilton R., Sun J., Smillie LD. (2019). Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 148(9), 1538.
• 35. Nielsen KS., Gwozdz W., De Ridder D. (2019). Unraveling the relationship between trait conscientiousness and subjective well-being: The mediating role of four conscientiousness strategies. Frontiers in Psychology. 10, 706.
• 36. Bunker CJ., Saysavanh SE., Kwan VS. (2021). Are gender differences in the big five the same on social media as offline?. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 3, 100085.
• 37. Chapman BP., Duberstein PR., Sörensen S., Lyness JM. (2007). Gender differences in Five Factor Model personality traits in an elderly cohort. Personality and Individual Differences. 43(6), 1594-1603.
• 38. Nolen-Hoeksema S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 100(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569
• 39. DeYoung CG., Hirsh JB., Shane MS., Papademetris X., Rajeevan N., Gray JR. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the big five. Psychological Science. 21(6), 820-828.
• 40. Nye CD., Roberts BW., Saucier G., Zhou X. (2008). Testing the measurement equivalence of personality adjective items across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality. 42(6), 1524-1536.
• 41. Murphy SA., Fisher PA., Robie C. (2021). International comparison of gender differences in the five-factor model of personality: An investigation across 105 countries. Journal of Research in Personality. 90, 104047.
• 42. Wann DL. (2006). Understanding the positive social psychological benefits of sport team identification: The team identification–social psychological health model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 10(4), 272-311.
• 43. Madrigal R. (2001). Social identity effects in a belief–attitude–intentions hierarchy: Implications for corporate sponsorship. Psychology & Marketing. 18(2), 145-165.
• 44. Lee S. (2023). Identifying emotions associated with sport team brands and testing its impact on sport consumer behavior in the advertising setting. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 16, 2057–2074.https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S400058
• 45. Li J., Li C., Tian B. (2024). Effect of neuroticism on Chinese athletes’ vigor: serial mediating roles of pre-competition anxiety and mind wandering. Frontiers in Public Health. 12, 1412203.
• 46. Fink JS. (2015). Female athletes, women’s sport, and the sport media commercial complex: Have we really “come a long way, baby”? Sport Management Review. 18(3), 331–342.
• 47. Lahey BB. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist. 64(4), 241.
• 48. Larsen RJ., Diener E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality. 21(1), 1-39.
• 49. McEwen, B. S. (2001). From molecules to mind: Stress, individual differences, and the social environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 935(1), 42-49.
• 50. Folkman S., Moskowitz JT. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist. 55(6), 647.
• 51. Luo J., Zhang B., Estabrook R., Graham EK., Driver CC., Schalet BD., Mroczek DK. (2022). Personality and health: Disentangling their between-person and within-person relationship in three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 122(3), 493.
• 52. Witkemper C., Lim CH., Waldburger A. (2012). Social media and sports marketing: Examining the motivations and constraints of Twitter users. Sport Marketing Quarterly. 21(3), 170–183.
• 53. Chang M. J., Kim J., Connaughton DP., Kim KT., Gonzalez SP. (2024). The effects of a sport team’s involvement regarding corporate social responsibility on fans’ pride and intention to donate: The moderating effects of urgency with involvement. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing. 24(5-6), 356-377.https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2024.100522
• 54. Walker M., Kent A. (2009). Do fans care? Assessing the influence of corporate social responsibility on consumer attitudes in the sport industry. Journal of Sport Management. 23(6), 743-769.
• 55. Ni P., Feng L. (2023). Improving collegiate student-athletes’ well-being: exploring the roles of openness to experience, knowledge sharing and perceived coaching effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 11916.