Examination of the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy in Turkish Legislation

Year 2024, , 1109 - 1117, 15.11.2024

Nimet Velioğlu

https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1505551

Abstract

Population growth, industrialization and technological advances increase the demand for energy. Due to problems such as global warming, environmental pollution and destruction, the trend towards alternative energy sources continues on a global scale. For this reason, the use of nuclear energy, one of the secondary energy sources, has tended to increase in recent years. Reasons such as the geographically uneven geographical distribution of resources that are raw materials for energy among countries and their exhaustibility, fluctuations in energy prices and the economical production of nuclear energy are among the reasons why countries in the world turn to nuclear energy. A number of accidents at nuclear power plants have had a negative impact on the perception of nuclear power plants, but for different reasons, nuclear energy is gaining popularity again. Nuclear power plants are the first thing that comes to mind when it comes to nuclear power, but it is also used effectively in medical treatments and applications of various branches of science as well as energy production. In global energy production; the fact that it aims to reduce carbon emissions by providing more energy production within the scope of sustainability, the continuous and uninterrupted continuation of electricity production using nuclear, the production of electricity at more affordable costs in nuclear power plants compared to other power plants (thermal, renewable, etc.), the fact that greenhouse gas emissions are almost negligible, and the use of nuclear technology in many fields such as physics, medicine, transportation, agriculture as well as energy production have made nuclear energy back on the agenda of countries in recent years. In nuclear energy, nuclear waste and their storage processes continue to be discussed as a problem in this process. For these reasons, the possibility of peaceful use of nuclear power has been questioned in academic platforms and various criteria have been determined. This article examines Türkiye's compliance with the criteria for the peaceful use of nuclear energy and clarifies the development process in this regard. Türkiye's legislation on nuclear energy, international conventions, nuclear safety, radiation control criteria and compliance with national legislation will be examined.

Keywords

Nuclear, Energy, Peaceful use, Legislation

References

• Ağır H, Özbek S, Türkmen S. 2020. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının belirleyicileri: ampirik bir tahmin. Uluslararası Ekon Araş Derg, 6(4): 39-48.
• Akleyev AV, Krestinina LY, Degteva MO, Tolstykh EI. 2017. Consequences of the radiation accident at the Mayak production association in 1957 (the’Kyshtym Accident’). J Radiol Protect, 37(3): 19-41.
• Çanka KF. 2011. Türkiye’deki yenilenebilir enerjilerde mevcut durum ve teşviklerdeki son gelişmeler. Müh Mak Derg, 52: 103-115.
• Çetinkaya Ş. 2019. Türkiye'nin enerji̇ güvenli̇ği̇nin sağlanması: bir ulusal güvenli̇k meselesi̇. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilim Derg, 43:208-215.
• Coşkun AA, Gençay, G. 2011. Kyoto Protocol and “deforestation”: A legal analysis on Turkish environment and forest legislation. J Forest Policy Econ, 13(5): 366-377.
• Demirgil B, Birol YE. 2018. Yenilenebilir enerji ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: 1990-2017 Türkiye örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniv Biyol İdari Bilim Fak Derg, 8: 223-242.
• Elvan OD, Birben Ü. 2021. Analysis of the ramsar convention's effectiveness on the Turkish legislation and judicial decisions. Wetlands, 41: 3.
• Elvan OD, Turker YO. 2014. Analysis of Turkish groundwater legislation and policy regarding international principles and conventions. Water Sci Technol, 69(10): 2155-2165.
• Erkök B, 2022. Almanya'nın enerji tasarrufu politikaları: Türkiye için bir örnek. Mali Ekon, 6: 294-324.
• Eş H, Mercan S. 2016. Türkiye için yeni bir sosyo-bilimsel tartışma: nükleer ile yaşam. Türk Eğitim Derg, 5: 47.
• Furuncu Y. 2016. Türkiye’nin enerji bağımlılığı ve akkuyu nükleer enerji santrali. Cumhuriyet Bilim Derg, 37: 198-207.
• Gizlenci Ş, Acar M, Şahin M. 2012. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının (biyodizel, biyoetanol ve biyokütle) projeksiyonu. Tarım Mak Bilim Derg, 8: 337-344.
• IAEA Safety Standards. 2015. URL: http:// www-ns.iaea.org/standards/conceptsterms.htm (Access date: 02 November 2023).
• Kahraman G. 2019. Türkiye'de kentleşmenin enerji tüketimi ve karbon emisyonlarına etkisi. Iğdır Üniv Fen Bilim Enstit Derg, 9(3): 1559-1566.
• Kara HE, Türkan N. 2022. Nükleer santrallerden salınan termal suların su ekosistemine ve turizme etkileri. Ohs Acad, 5(2): 57-65.
• Katsuya T. 2001. Public response to the Tokai nuclear accident. Risk Analysis, 21(6): 1039–1046.
• Kavaz İ. 2021. Nuclear energy in the World and Türkiye. In: International Conference on Eurasian Economies, August 24-25, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp: 296.
• Kaya İS. 2012. Nükleer enerji dünyasında çevre ve insan. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniv Sosyal Bilim Enstit Derg, 12(1): 24-29.
• Kocaoğlu NK. 2010. Nükleer tesis işletenin hukuki sorumluluğu: karşılaştırmalı ve uluslararası özel hukuk analizi. Ankara Barosu Derg, 68:33-110.
• Koltukçu H. 2010. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının Türkiye açısından swot analizi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya, Türkiye, ss: 136.
• Miden CJ. Verplanken HB. 1990. The stability of nuclear attitudes after Chernobyl. J Environl Psychol, 10(2): 111–119.
• Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. 2023. Nuclear energy. URL: https://enerji.gov.tr/neupgm-nukleer-enerji (accessed date: December 26, 2023).
• Muray RL, Holbert KE. 2020. Nuclear Energy. Oxford, UK, 8th ed., pp: 394-397.
• Özdemir S, 2020. Alternatif ve nükleer enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi: Fransa örneği. Ekon Politik Finans Araş Derg, 3:302-313.
• Pamir AN. 2003. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de enerji, Türkiye’nin enerji kaynakları ve enerji politikaları. Metalürji Derg, 134(23): 1-39.
• Temurçin K, Aliağaoğlu A. 2003. Nükleer enerji̇ ve tartışmalar ışığında Türkiye’de nükleer enerji̇ gerçeği̇. Coğrafi Bilim Derg, 1(2): 25-39.
• Tüylüoğlu EH, Türkan N. 2023. Nükleer güç santrallerinin çevresel etkileri. Ohs Akad, 6: 50-58.
• Uyar, TS. 2017. Barriers and opportunities for transformation of conventional energy system of Turkey to 100% renewable community power. J Towards 100% Renewable Energy: Techniques, Costs and Regional Case-Studies Cham: Springer International Publishing, London, UK, pp: 105-118.
• Yıldırım HH. 2019. Yeni̇lenebi̇li̇r enerji̇ yatırımlarındaki̇ teşvi̇kleri̇n yatırım performansları üzeri̇ne etki̇si̇. Finans Ekon Sosyal Araş Derg, 4: 330-345.