Land Grading Analysis Based on Farmer Opinions Using Fuzzy AHP

Abstract

In land consolidation (LC) projects, grading is one of the most critical stages in determining parcel values fairly and accurately. The fact that the grading process is based on scientific methods, can be proven with mathematical calculations, and reflects farmers' opinions, increases the application's reliability and acceptability. In this study, as part of the LC project in Boyalılar village, Daday district, Kastamonu province, an expert team of farmers familiar with the LC area evaluated the parcels using the pairwise comparison method. These comparisons were analyzed using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Agricultural advantages on the land were determined based on the farmer's knowledge, and the results were compared with grading maps prepared by the State Hydraulic Works (DSI). The study's findings revealed that the agricultural assessments of expert farmers and the soil index maps produced by the official institution were largely consistent. This demonstrates the parallelism between local knowledge and scientific data. However, differences were identified in the spatial assessments. While the DSI method only considers the administrative unit center and roads, farmer experts emphasized that proximity to the district center and neighboring villages should also be considered among the factors affecting parcel values. It was determined that location scoring should consider not only the administrative centers of the LC area but also proximity to all surrounding administrative units. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that interviews with farmers familiar with the application area can be reliable in rating studies, saving both time and reducing costs.

Keywords

• Land consolidation
• Rating
• Farmer opinions
• Fuzzy AHP

References

1. Acar Ö, Akdeniz HB. 2023. Arazi toplulaştırma projelerinin parsel şekil değişimine etkisinin analizi: Manyas/Salur mahallesi örneği, Türkiye. In: Ayaz T, Öztürk F, editors. Tarımsal Eski Sorunlara Yeni Yaklaşımlar, pp: 81-101, Iksad Publications House, Ankara, ISBN: 978-625-367-281-2.
2. Acar Ö, Bengin E. 2018. Evaluation of Yozgat (Baştürk village) land consolidation project in terms of regional development. In: 3rd Intern Bozok Symp Reg Dev Socio-Cult Struct, 3-5 May, Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye, pp: 1105-1113.
3. Akdeniz HB, Acar Ö. 2023. Arazi toplulaştırma projelerinin arazi parçalanması değişimine etkisi bakımından değerlendirilmesi: Manyas / Yeniköy mahallesi örneği, Türkiye. In: Ayaz T, Öztürk F, editors. Tarımsal Eski Sorunlara Yeni Yaklaşımlar, pp:103-121, Iksad Publications House, Ankara, ISBN: 978-625-367-281-2.
4. Akdeniz HB, İnam Ş, Çay T. 2023. Evaluation of land consolidation projects implemented in terms of their effects on rural development in Türkiye. COMU J Agric Fac, 11 (1): 18-30. ISSN: 2147–8384 / e-ISSN: 2564–6826. doi: 10.33202/comuagri.1232016.
5. Anonymous. 2010. Tarım Reformu Genel Müdürlüğü arazi toplulaştırması teknik talimatı, T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 1-15.
6. Anonymous. 2019. Arazi toplulaştırması ve tarla içi geliştirme hizmetleri uygulama yönetmeliği, Ankara. URL: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/02/20190207-5.htm (accessed date: 29 August 2025).
7. Bengin E, Acar Ö. 2018. The importance of rural area regulation in agricultural development of the city of Yozgat. In: 3rd International Bozok Symposium Regional Development and Socio-Cultural Structure, 3–5 May, Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye, pp: 414-421.
8. Chang DY. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3): 649–655.

9. Cheng CH. 1997. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. Eur J Oper Res, 96(2), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00026-4
10. Çay T, Acar Ö, Sözen MN. 2025. Comparison of distribution models in land consolidation projects: Kırşehir-Mucur-Kepez village example. In: 10th International Cukurova Agriculture and Veterinary Congress, 22-23 June, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 1375-1386.
11. Çay T, Acar Ö. 2022. Balıkesir ilinde yapılan arazi toplulaştırma projelerinin teknik analizi. Geçmişten Günümüze Balıkesir’in Kültürel Mirası, 4: 67-98 Palet Yayınları, E- ISBN:978-625-6401-09-9.
12. Çay T, Acar Ö. 2025. Technical examination of pasture areas in land consolidation projects and legal framework: The case of Balikesir province. BSJ Eng Sci 8(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1560496
13. Çay T, Iscan F. 2004. Algorithm developing for land consolidation software. In: XXth ISPRS congress. 12–13 July, Istanbul, Türkiye.
14. Demetriou D. 2018. Automating the land valuation process carried out in land consolidation schemes. Land Use Policy, 75: 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.049
15. Demiraslan M, Özer U, Eraslan H. 2019. Arazi toplulaştırması uygulamalarında karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. 17. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 25-27 Nisan 2019 Ankara, Türkiye, pp:1-4.
16. FAO. 2012. Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, Fish Forests Context Nat Food Secur. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/i2801e
17. Hartvigsen M, Gorgan M. 2020. FAO experiences with land market development and land management instruments in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. J Agric Envtl L, 15: 85-103. https://doi.org/10.21029/JAEL.2020.29.85
18. Korthals Altes WK, Bong Im S. 2011. Promoting rural development through the use of land consolidation: The case of Korea. Int Plan Stud, 16(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.561060
19. Leń P. 2017. The ranking destination areas for land consolidation works, due to the size checkerboard land on the example of Białaczów. Environmental Engineering 10th International Conference. Lithuania, pp: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3846/enviro.2017.213
20. Nguyen HQ, Warr P. 2020. Land consolidation as technical change: Economic impacts in rural Vietnam. World Dev, 127, 104750.
21. Pašakarnis G, Maliene V. 2010. Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying land consolidation. Land use policy, 27(2), 545-549.
22. Rao J. 2022. Comprehensive land consolidation as a development policy for rural vitalisation: Rural In Situ Urbanisation through semi socio-economic restructuring in Huai Town. J Rural Stud, 93, 386-397.
23. Scarelli A, Venzi L. 2004. A multicriteria model for selecting eligible buyers for land consolidation. Int J Strategic Property Manage, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1648715X.2004.9637503
24. Uzunal E, Arslan H. 2025. Evaluation of the spatial distribution of soil index values used in land consolidation projects with different interpolation methods. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 13(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.1702744
25. Van Dijk T. 2003. Dealing with Central European land fragmentation: A critical assessment on the use of Western European instruments. Eburon, pp: 11, ISBN 90-5166-996-8.
26. Veršinskas T, Vidar M, Hartvigsen M, Mitic Arsova K, Van Holst F, Gorgan M. 2020. Legal guide on land consolidation. FAO Legal Guide No. 3. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9520en
27. Zrobek S, Kovalyshyn O, Renigier-Biłozor M, Kovalyshyn S, Kovalyshyn O. 2020. Fuzzy logic method of valuation supporting sustainable development of the agricultural land market. Sustainable Dev, 28(5): 1094-1105.