Review

Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches

Volume: 9 Number: 3 May 15, 2026
TR EN

Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches

Abstract

We present a systematic review of keystroke-dynamics authentication across classical machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), hybrid, and emerging quantum-ML approaches. The review synthesizes evidence from desktop, mobile, and web settings; compares common datasets (e.g., CMU, GREYC, Aalto, Clarkson); and evaluates models using EER, FAR, and FRR. Three findings stand out. First, dataset breadth, device context, and evaluation protocol explain much of the variance reported in the literature; on free-text inputs, modern DL (e.g., Transformers, Siamese networks) typically achieves EER ≈0.01–2% on large, diverse sets, outperforming classical ML. Second, hybrid designs, feature extraction with DL plus classical classifiers or multimodal fusion (keystroke + touch/mouse), improve robustness and user experience relative to single-modality systems. Third, claims of near-perfect accuracy from quantum-ML are confined to small or simulated studies and are not yet generalized. We map model risks to the OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet (replay/spoofing, template security, adversarial examples, lockout usability) and outline mitigations (MFA, liveness, cancelable templates, throttling). Finally, we chart a practical pipeline and highlight near-term directions: federated learning and edge deployment for privacy/latency, explainable AI for auditability, and standardized benchmarks for fair comparison.

Keywords

References

  1. Anwar, F., Khan, B., Kiah, L., & Goh, K. (2022). A Comprehensive Insight into BlockchainTechnology: Past Development, Present Impact and Future Considerations İnternational Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.01311101
  2. Barra, S., Castiglione, A., Narducci, F., De Marsico, M., & Nappi, M. (2019). Biometric data on the edge for secure, smart and user tailored access to cloud services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.06.019
  3. Bhasin, N.,(2025). Authentication using dynamics keystrokes and quantum machine learning. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(49s), 1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i49s.10134
  4. Bhatia, A., & Hanmandlu, M. (2017). Keystroke dynamics based authentication using information sets. Journal of Modern Physics, 8(9), 1557–1583. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.89094
  5. Bonneau, J., Herley, C., van Oorschot, P. C., & Stajano, F. (2012). The quest to replace passwords: A framework for comparative evaluation of web authentication schemes. IEEE Security & Privacy, 10(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2012.44
  6. Ceker, H., & Upadhyaya, S. (2016). Keystroke dynamics for user authentication and identification. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791182
  7. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608
  8. Fatima, K. & Afaf, M. (2022). Keystroke-based biometric authentication in mobile applications. International Journal of Software Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSI.303574

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Information Security Management, Information Systems (Other)

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

May 15, 2026

Submission Date

September 19, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Gündoğan, N. V., & Celiktas, B. (2026). Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(3), 1503-1522. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1787486
AMA
1.Gündoğan NV, Celiktas B. Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9(3):1503-1522. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1787486
Chicago
Gündoğan, Nebil Vural, and Baris Celiktas. 2026. “Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 (3): 1503-22. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1787486.
EndNote
Gündoğan NV, Celiktas B (May 1, 2026) Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 3 1503–1522.
IEEE
[1]N. V. Gündoğan and B. Celiktas, “Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1503–1522, May 2026, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1787486.
ISNAD
Gündoğan, Nebil Vural - Celiktas, Baris. “Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9/3 (May 1, 2026): 1503-1522. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1787486.
JAMA
1.Gündoğan NV, Celiktas B. Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9:1503–1522.
MLA
Gündoğan, Nebil Vural, and Baris Celiktas. “Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2026, pp. 1503-22, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1787486.
Vancouver
1.Nebil Vural Gündoğan, Baris Celiktas. Keystroke Dynamics for Authentication: A Systematic Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Hybrid, and Quantum Approaches. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026 May 1;9(3):1503-22. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1787486

                            24890