Structural Evaluation of an Aircraft Wing with a Repaired Front Spar

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 914 - 921, 15.03.2026

Gürkan Ortamevzi

https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1852119

https://izlik.org/JA52UZ58DB

Abstract

This article hypothesizes that the leading spar of an experimental aircraft wing is damaged, and that this damage will be repaired using different variations. The effect of these repairs on the wing's strength is investigated. Aircraft accidents and incidents caused by damage or cracks in the leading spar served as the basis for this study. 3D models of all repair variations were created, and mathematical mesh models were developed to examine the strength parameters generated using the finite element method. The von-Mises stress, shear stress, safety factor, and wingtip deformation in the repaired area of the leading spar were compared according to the repair variations to evaluate the wing's strength. Furthermore, the strength condition was also evaluated based on the damaged spar sector. During the evaluations, the strength parameters were examined using an undamaged wing as a reference.

Keywords

Front spar , Spar repair , Finite element method , Wing strength , von-Mises stress , Shear stress

Ethical Statement

This study did not involve human participants or animals and therefore did not require ethics committee approval.

References

• Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2011). Shigley’s mechanical engineering design (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• European Aviation Safety Agency. (2008). Airworthiness directive: CF-2007-31 – DHC-6 Twin Otter wing front spar adapter cracks (Issue CF-2007-31). https://ad.easa.europa.eu/ad/CF-2007-31
• Hirsch, J., Skrotzki, B., & Gottstein, G. (Eds.). (2008). Aluminium alloys: The physical and mechanical properties (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
• Kaya, İ. (2022). The effect of center of gravity and shear center locations on flutter behavior of wings (Unpublished thesis, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36231.27048
• Keçelioğlu, G. (2008). Stress and fracture analysis of riveted joints (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University). OpenMETU. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/18070
• Kondo, A., Kasahara, T., & Kanda, A. (2021). A simplified finite element model of riveted joints for structural analyses with consideration of nonlinear load-transfer characteristics. Aerospace, 8(7), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8070196
• Langrand, B., Deletombe, E., Markiewicz, E., & Drazetic, P. (2001). Riveted joint modeling for numerical analysis of airframe crashworthiness. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 38(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00050-6
• Majka, A. (2013). Flight loads of mini UAV. Solid State Phenomena, 198, 194-199. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.198.194
• National Transportation Safety Board. (1999). Aviation investigation final report: Accident number FTW99FA123—Cessna 402C, N819BW, Goldsby, Oklahoma (Report No. FTW99FA123). https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/46183/pdf
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2005). Aviation investigation final report: Incident number SEA05IA115—Piper PA-46-350P wing lower spar cap crack found during inspection (Report No. SEA05IA115). https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/61685/pdf
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2018). Materials laboratory factual report: ERA18FA120—Piper PA-28R wing spar lower cap fatigue cracking (Report No. ERA18FA120). https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?FileExtension=pdf&FileName=ERA18FA120+Structures+Factual-Rel.pdf&ID=7869710
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2023, August 23). Aviation investigation final report: Accident number WPR21FA266—Beech C90, N3688P, Wikieup, Arizona (Report No. WPR21FA266). https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/103452/pdf
• Pippig, R., Schmidl, E., Steinert, P., Schubert, A., & Lampke, T. (2017). Experimental and numerical investigation of the residual yield strength of aluminium alloy EN AW-2024-T3 affected by artificially produced pitting corrosion. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 181(1), 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/181/1/012023
• Saravanan, G., Johnson, A. A., & Pandiarajan, P. (2018). Finite element analysis of aircraft wing joint and fatigue life prediction under variable loading using MSC Patran and Nastran. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(11), 1111–1119. http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJMET?Volume=9&Issue=11
• Voß, A. (2020). Design and structural optimization of a flying wing of low aspect ratio based on flight loads (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin).
• Zheng, Y., Dai, Y., Huang, G., & Hu, Y. (2025). Gust response alleviation via wingtip bending freely with fluid-structure interaction approach based on dynamic modal rotation method. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2025.103851