Research Article

A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving

Volume: 9 Number: 3 May 15, 2026
EN TR

A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving

Abstract

Robust 2D object detection is a cornerstone of perception systems in autonomous vehicles (AVs). While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) like the YOLO series have long dominated real-time detection, the emergence of Vision Transformers (ViTs) introduces new paradigms in handling global context and occlusions. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two state-of-the-art architectures: YOLOv8 (representing the peak of efficient CNN design) and RT-DETR-L (a real-time detection transformer). We evaluate these models on the extensive Waymo Open Dataset, focusing on critical safety metrics including Mean Average Precision (mAP) at varying Intersection over Union (IoU) thresholds (0.5, 0.5:0.95) and object scales (small, medium, large). Furthermore, we conduct a fine-grained robustness analysis across diverse environmental conditions, specifically varying weather (fair vs. rain) and time-of-day (day vs. night). Our methodology provides a rigorous framework for understanding the trade-offs between the inductive bias of CNNs and the global attention mechanisms of Transformers in safety-critical driving scenarios.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK)

Project Number

125E400

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because there was no study on animals or humans.

Thanks

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK) under Grant Number 125E153. The numerical calculations reported in this paper were fully/partially performed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA resources).

References

  1. Alimov, M., & Meiramkhanov, T. (2024). Domain Generalization in Autonomous Driving: Evaluating YOLOv8s, RT-DETR, and YOLO-NAS with the ROAD-Almaty Dataset. arXiv:2412.12349. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12349
  2. Bazi, Y., Bashir, N., Melgani, F., Al Rahhal, M. M., Zuair, M. A., & Al-Hichri, H. (2021). Vision transformers for remote sensing image classification. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 516.
  3. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020). End-to-end object detection with transformers. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 213–229). Springer.
  4. Cheng, Q., Ling, J., Du, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2025). Toward comprehensive traffic scene understanding: a benchmark and detector for traffic object detection in smart city surveillance. Geo-spatial Information Science, 1-24.
  5. Das, P., Jain, C., & Gola, K. K. (2026). Surveillance to Self-Driving: A Comprehensive Review of Object Detection and Tracking Paradigms. Iran Journal of Computer Science. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42044-025-00387-w
  6. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., ... & Houlsby, N. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929.
  7. Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012). Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 3354–3361). IEEE.
  8. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023). Ultralytics YOLOv8 (Version 8.0.0) [Software]. Available from https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Information Systems Development Methodologies and Practice

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 15, 2026

Submission Date

January 27, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 14, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Karadurak, B., & Kılıçarslan, M. (2026). A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(3), 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1872135
AMA
1.Karadurak B, Kılıçarslan M. A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9(3):1207-1217. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1872135
Chicago
Karadurak, Burak, and Mehmet Kılıçarslan. 2026. “A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 (3): 1207-17. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1872135.
EndNote
Karadurak B, Kılıçarslan M (May 1, 2026) A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 3 1207–1217.
IEEE
[1]B. Karadurak and M. Kılıçarslan, “A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1207–1217, May 2026, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1872135.
ISNAD
Karadurak, Burak - Kılıçarslan, Mehmet. “A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9/3 (May 1, 2026): 1207-1217. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1872135.
JAMA
1.Karadurak B, Kılıçarslan M. A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9:1207–1217.
MLA
Karadurak, Burak, and Mehmet Kılıçarslan. “A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2026, pp. 1207-1, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1872135.
Vancouver
1.Burak Karadurak, Mehmet Kılıçarslan. A Comparative Robustness Analysis of YOLOV8 and RT-DETR in Autonomous Driving. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026 May 1;9(3):1207-1. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1872135

                            24890