Research Article

AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights

Volume: 9 Number: 3 May 15, 2026
TR EN

AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights

Abstract

This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as a collaborative design partner in architectural education, particularly within a studio setting. Despite the increasing adoption of AI tools in design workflows, there is limited empirical evidence on how positioning AI as a collaborative design partner rather than a mere technical instrument affects student creativity, problem-solving, and the evolving digital design culture within the studio environment. Conducted during the Fall 2024-2025 term at Abdullah Gül University’s ARCA105: Design Practices Studio elective course, the research adopts a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data collected through student surveys, instructor autoethnographic reflections, and final product evaluations. Findings reveal that AI significantly enhances process efficiency and early-stage ideation, while its contribution to architectural creativity and complex decision-making depends on students’ critical engagement and disciplinary reasoning. Triangulation of data sources highlights a perceptual gap between student optimism and instructor evaluations, underscoring the need for structured pedagogical guidance to harness AI’s potential without compromising core design competencies. The study contributes to ongoing debates on AI integration in design education. It offers recommendations for developing inclusive, critically mediated, and hybrid pedagogical models that position AI as a meaningful design partner in studio learning.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Abdullah Gul University (approval date: 05 March, 2025, protocol code: 118821).

Thanks

This research was conducted exclusively with AGU architecture students enrolled in the ARCA105 Design Practices Studio at 2024/25 fall term. We would like to thank the students of the term for their contributions.

References

  1. Alaçam, S., Güzelci, O. Z., Bacınoğlu, S. Z., Kızılyaprak, H. N., Uzun, C., Coşkun, E., & Karadağ, İ. (2025). Artificial intelligence 101 for architectural education. Öneri Dergisi, 20(Özel Sayı), 219–237. https://izlik.org/JA62US88JN
  2. Albakry, N., Hashim, M., Harun, M., & Puandi, M. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in creative design for advertising and digital content in educational contexts. Semarak International Journal of Creative Art and Design, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37934/sijcad.4.1.1223
  3. Asfour, O. (2024). How artificial intelligence could affect the future of architectural design education. Resourceedings, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21625/resourceedings.v4i2.1113
  4. Başarır, L. (2022). Modelling AI in architectural education. Gazi University Journal of Science, 35(4), 1260–1278. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.967981
  5. Bölek, B., Tutal, O., & Özbaşaran, H. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence applications in architecture. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 4(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4i1085
  6. Boling, E., Siegel, M. A., Smith, K. M., & Parrish, P. (2013). Student goes on a journey; Stranger rides into the classroom: Narratives and the instructor in the design studio. In J. B. Reitan, P. Lloyd, E. Bohemia, L. M. Nielsen, I. Digranes, & E. Lutnæs (Eds.), DRS // Cumulus: Design Learning for Tomorrow (pp. 14–17). https://doi.org/10.21606/learnxdesign.2013.015
  7. Boyacıoğlu, E., Aycı, H., Aksoy, B., & Balcı, B. (2024). On the threshold: A transitionary architectural design studio (pp. 245–260). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2329-8.ch015
  8. Cao, Y., Abdul Aziz, A., & Mohd Arshard, W. N. R. (2024). Stable diffusion in architectural design: Closing doors or opening new horizons? International Journal of Architectural Computing, 23(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771241270257

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Computer-Assisted Design

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 15, 2026

Submission Date

January 30, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 7, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Kevseroğlu Kurban, Ö., & Kıdık Baran, A. (2026). AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(3), 1139-1149. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1878241
AMA
1.Kevseroğlu Kurban Ö, Kıdık Baran A. AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9(3):1139-1149. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1878241
Chicago
Kevseroğlu Kurban, Özlem, and Ayşegül Kıdık Baran. 2026. “AI As a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 (3): 1139-49. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1878241.
EndNote
Kevseroğlu Kurban Ö, Kıdık Baran A (May 1, 2026) AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 3 1139–1149.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Kevseroğlu Kurban and A. Kıdık Baran, “AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1139–1149, May 2026, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1878241.
ISNAD
Kevseroğlu Kurban, Özlem - Kıdık Baran, Ayşegül. “AI As a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9/3 (May 1, 2026): 1139-1149. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1878241.
JAMA
1.Kevseroğlu Kurban Ö, Kıdık Baran A. AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9:1139–1149.
MLA
Kevseroğlu Kurban, Özlem, and Ayşegül Kıdık Baran. “AI As a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2026, pp. 1139-4, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1878241.
Vancouver
1.Özlem Kevseroğlu Kurban, Ayşegül Kıdık Baran. AI as a Design Partner: Evaluating Its Role in Architectural Education through Student and Instructor Insights. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026 May 1;9(3):1139-4. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1878241

                            24890