TR
EN
A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs
Abstract
Digital phase shifters are key components in modern wireless communication and sensing systems, including phased-array antennas, radar front ends, satellite terminals, and emerging mmWave/sub-THz platforms. However, the reported literature remains highly heterogeneous in terms of architecture, technology platform, operating frequency, and validation depth, which makes direct comparison difficult. This review systematically examines 27 papers covering a total of 30 digital phase-shifter designs and classifies them into four main categories: switch-type phase shifters (STPS), vector-sum/vector-modulator-based phase shifters (VSPS/VMPS), lattice/all-pass-network-based phase shifters, and special/other approaches such as delay-based and NEMS-related solutions. An evidence-aware comparison methodology is adopted to evaluate the reported studies using key metrics including RMS phase error, RMS amplitude error, insertion loss/gain, DC power consumption, area, operating band, and implementation technology. The comparison shows that nominal bit resolution alone is not a sufficient predictor of practical phase accuracy; instead, performance is more strongly influenced by architectural realization, parasitic-aware implementation, calibration strategy, and operating frequency. The reviewed results further indicate that passive STPS structures remain attractive for low-complexity and low-power applications, whereas vector-based architectures provide high resolution and calibration flexibility at the expense of higher power and implementation complexity. Lattice/all-pass-based structures remain relevant for wideband phase-flat operation, while delay-based approaches appear promising for sub-THz applications. Overall, the review does not support the existence of a universally optimal topology; rather, the most suitable solution depends on the dominant application constraint, such as accuracy, bandwidth, power, area, or scalability. The taxonomy, comparison framework, and cross-comparison presented in this work are intended to support more consistent evaluation and more informed topology selection in future digital phase-shifter research.
Keywords
- Digital phase shifters
- Phased-array antennas
- Beamforming
- Vector-sum phase shifters
- RMS phase error
- mmWave and sub-THz systems
Thanks
The authors would like to acknowledge ChatGPT for assistance in improving the language and overall flow of the manuscript.
References
- Anjos, E. V., Schreurs, D. M. P., Vandenbosch, G. A., & Geurts, M. (2020). A 14–50-GHz phase shifter with all-pass networks for 5G mobile applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 68(2), 762–774. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2019.2948852
- Avci, C., Gunes, E. O., & Yarman, B. S. (2019). A symmetric lattice-based wideband wide phase range digital phase shifter topology. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 47(8), 1269–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.2639
- Brilhante, D. D. S., Manjarres, J. C., Moreira, R., de Oliveira Veiga, L., de Rezende, J. F., Müller, F., ... & de Figueiredo, F. A. P. (2023). A literature survey on AI-aided beamforming and beam management for 5G and 6G systems. Sensors, 23(9), Article 4359. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094359
- Chiu, H. C., Chen, C. M., Chang, L. C., & Kao, H. L. (2021). A 5-bit X-band GaN HEMT-based phase shifter. Electronics, 10(6), Article 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10060658
- Cho, J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, M. (2025). The design of a 140 GHz 28 nm CMOS vector-sum phase shifter based on Gilbert cell and current-steering amplifiers. Chips, 4(4), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/chips4040050
- Coviello, G., Avitabile, G., Piccinni, G., D’Amato, G., & Talarico, C. (2016). Effects on phased arrays radiation pattern due to phase error distribution in the phase shifter operation. MATEC Web of Conferences, 76, Article 03002. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167603002
- Gharsalli, S., Aloui, R., Mhatli, S., Corona-Chavez, A., Brito-Brito, Z., Mishra, S. K., & Llamas-Garro, I. (2026). Comprehensive phase shifter review: State of the art and future trends. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 116. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERB25082704
- Ghorbani, F. (2025). Highly linear and fast phase shifting technology [Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool].
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Circuits and Systems
Journal Section
Review
Publication Date
September 15, 2026
Submission Date
May 7, 2026
Acceptance Date
September 2, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 9 Number: 5
APA
Taş, S., & Kaçar, F. (2026). A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 9(5), 2860-2870. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1945963
AMA
1.Taş S, Kaçar F. A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9(5):2860-2870. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1945963
Chicago
Taş, Sena, and Fırat Kaçar. 2026. “A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 (5): 2860-70. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1945963.
EndNote
Taş S, Kaçar F (September 1, 2026) A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9 5 2860–2870.
IEEE
[1]S. Taş and F. Kaçar, “A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2860–2870, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1945963.
ISNAD
Taş, Sena - Kaçar, Fırat. “A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 9/5 (September 1, 2026): 2860-2870. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1945963.
JAMA
1.Taş S, Kaçar F. A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026;9:2860–2870.
MLA
Taş, Sena, and Fırat Kaçar. “A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2026, pp. 2860-7, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1945963.
Vancouver
1.Sena Taş, Fırat Kaçar. A Review of Digital Phase Shifter Architectures: Operating Principles, Comparison Methodology, and Design Trade-Offs. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2026 Sep. 1;9(5):2860-7. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1945963