Congestion-Triggered Electric-Vehicle Charging Station Assignment Using Short-Term Cumulative Demand Forecasts

Abstract

Short-term congestion at public electric-vehicle charging stations depends on both near-future demand and how vehicles are distributed across the network. We forecast cumulative station-level charging initiations and use the forecasts in congestion-triggered station assignment. The analysis reuses 441077 publicly released charging transactions from 13 stations in Jiaxing, China, aggregated at 15-minute resolution. Daily and weekly seasonal baselines are compared with Poisson, Tweedie, hurdle, and quantile LightGBM models for cumulative 15-, 30-, and 60-minute demand. Because physical arrivals and queueing times are not observed, recorded charging starts served as simulation-entry events in the counterfactual analysis. The forecasts are embedded in a counterfactual capacity-and-routing simulation with transaction-level service durations, inbound reservations for redirected vehicles, partial recommendation acceptance, an eight-minute switching-time penalty, queue abandonment, demand growth, and charger outages. All routing policies are evaluated on immutable scenarios with common random numbers over 21 test days stratified by weekday and charging-initiation volume. Relative to the stronger daily seasonal baseline, the Tweedie model reduces mean absolute error by 17.6-19.8% and root-mean-square error by 21.7-26.8%. Under normal demand and full capacity, the routing policies remain inactive and introduce no unnecessary switching. Under the evaluated stress scenarios and full recommendation acceptance, dynamic assignment reduces simulated mean total delay by 75.0-78.7% and simulated abandonment by approximately 95-100%, while rerouting fewer than 10% of vehicles. Risk-aware routing has the numerically lowest aggregate simulated delay, but under the combined demand-and-outage scenario it differs from current-load routing by only 0.001 minutes per vehicle, and the pairs 95% confidence interval included zero. Within these counterfactual scenarios, most of the reduction therefore come from the shared congestion-triggered routing architecture rather than from the forecast-risk terms.

Keywords

• Electric-vehicle charging
• Cumulative demand forecasting
• Sparse count prediction
• Probabilistic forecasting
• Charging-station assignment
• Congestion management

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because there was no study on animals or humans.

Thanks

This study did not generate or collect a new dataset. It reuses the publicly available Jiaxing electric-vehicle charging transaction dataset introduced by (Zhang et al., 2025).

References

1. Aghsaee, R., Hecht, C., Schwinger, F., Figgener, J., Jarke, M., & Sauer, D. U. (2023). Data-Driven, Short-Term Prediction of Charging Station Occupation. Electricity, 4, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.3390/electricity4020009
2. Alaraj, M., Radi, M., Alsisi, E., Majdalawieh, M., & Darwish, M. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Electric Vehicle Charging Demand Forecasting: A Systematized Literature Review. Energies, 18, 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174779
3. Ali, M. W., Mustafa, M. A., Shuvo, M. A., & Sick, B. (2026). Location-Based Probabilistic Load Forecasting of Electric Vehicle Charging Sites: Deep Transfer Learning with Multi-quantile Temporal Convolutional Network. In Architecture of Computing Systems (Vol. 15839). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03281-2_14
4. Basmadjian, R., Kirpes, B., Mrkos, J., & Cuchý, M. (2020). A Reference Architecture for Interoperable Reservation Systems in Electric Vehicle Charging. Smart Cities, 3, 1405–1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040067
5. Brückmann, G., & Bernauer, T. (2023). An experimental analysis of consumer preferences towards public charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 116, 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103626
6. Dang, S., Peng, L., Zhao, J., Li, J., & Kong, Z. (2022). A Quantile Regression Random Forest-Based Short-Term Load Probabilistic Forecasting Method. Energies, 15, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020663
7. Dudkina, E., Scarpelli, C., Apicella, V., Ceraolo, M., & Crisostomi, E. (2025). Optimised Centralised Charging of Electric Vehicles Along Motorways. Sustainability, 17, 5668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125668
8. Elahe, M. F., Kabir, M. A., Mahmud, S. M., & Azim, R. (2022, December). Factors Impacting Short-Term Load Forecasting of Charging Station to Electric Vehicle. Electronics, 12, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12010055

9. Hanni, U. e., Yamamoto, T., & Nakamura, T. (2024). Modeling of the Acceptable Waiting Time for EV Charging in Japan. Sustainability, 16, 2536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062536
10. Heting, Q., Shuihai, D., Huayan, S., & Jun, Z. (2021, June). Charging station planning based on the accumulation prospect theory and dynamic user equilibrium. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 9, 2521–2539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00414-w
11. Hoen, F. S., Díez-Gutiérrez, M., Babri, S., Hess, S., & Tørset, T. (2023). Charging electric vehicles on long trips and the willingness to pay to reduce waiting for charging: Stated preference survey in Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 175, 103774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103774
12. Hussain, A., Lu, Q.-C., Rizvi, S. S., Wang, S., & Kwon, S. J. (2025, October). Short term demand forecasting of electric vehicle charging stations using context aware temporal transformer model. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20557-x
13. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 3149–3157). Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc.
14. Keskin, F., Yıldız, M., & Arslannur, B. (2024, July). A Data-Driven Framework for Driving Cycle Generation and Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241260700
15. Kim, M., Park, W. Y., Moon, H. S., & Kim, Y.-S. (2026). A Review of Electric Vehicle Charging Demand Forecasting Models by Prediction Horizon: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 21, 1457–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-025-02556-0
16. Lee, K.-B., Ahmed, M. A., Kang, D.-K., & Kim, Y.-C. (2020). Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Optimal Route and Charging Station Selection. Energies, 13, 6255. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236255
17. Liu, H., Yin, W., Yuan, X., & Niu, M. (2018). Reserving Charging Decision-Making Model and Route Plan for Electric Vehicles Considering Information of Traffic and Charging Station. Sustainability, 10, 1324. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051324
18. Mansour, H. S., Mohamed, A. S., & Abdel-Aziz, M. (2026). Electric vehicles charging stations load forecasting based on hybrid XGBoost-BiLSTM model. Scientific Reports, 16, 374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29739-z
19. Matkovic, D., Pilski, T. M., & Capuder, T. (2025, August). Participation of electric vehicle charging station aggregators in the day-ahead energy market using demand forecasting and uncertainty-based pricing. Energy, 328, 136299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136299
20. Mishra, P., Miller, E., Santhanagopalan, S., Bennion, K., & Meintz, A. (2022). A Framework to Analyze the Requirements of a Multiport Megawatt-Level Charging Station for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles. Energies, 15, 3788. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103788
21. Mohammad, F., Kang, D.-K., Ahmed, M. A., & Kim, Y.-C. (2023). Energy Demand Load Forecasting for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Network Based on ConvLSTM and BiConvLSTM Architectures. IEEE Access, 11, 67350–67369. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3274657
22. Nie, J., Xia, S., Liu, Y., Ding, S., Hu, L., Zhao, M., Fan, Y., Abdel-Aty, M., Preindl, M., & Jiang, X. (2023). A Data-Driven and Human-Centric EV Charging Recommendation System at City-Scale. Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems, (pp. 427–438). https://doi.org/10.1145/3575813.3597350
23. Orzechowski, A., Lugosch, L., Shu, H., Yang, R., Li, W., & Meyer, B. H. (2023). A data-driven framework for medium-term electric vehicle charging demand forecasting. Energy and AI, 14, 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100267
24. Rupnik, B., Wang, Y., & Kramberger, T. (2025). Hybrid Model for Motorway EV Fast-Charging Demand Analysis Based on Traffic Volume. Systems, 13, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040272
25. Schoenberg, S., & Dressler, F. (2023). Reducing Waiting Times at Charging Stations With Adaptive Electric Vehicle Route Planning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2022.3140894
26. Sreekumar, A. V., & Lekshmi, R. R. (2024, December). Electric vehicle charging station demand prediction model deploying data slotting. Results in Engineering, 24, 103095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103095
27. Unterluggauer, T., Rauma, K., Järventausta, P., & Rehtanz, C. (2021). Short-term load forecasting at electric vehicle charging sites using a multivariate multi-step long short-term memory: A case study from Finland. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 11, 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1049/els2.12028
28. Widmann, J., & Sawodny, O. (2026). Intention-Aware Electric Vehicle Routing: A Markovian Queuing Model Approach to Reduce Wait Times at Charging Stations. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 20. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.70180
29. Yi, Z., Liu, X. C., Wei, R., Chen, X., & Dai, J. (2021, August). Electric vehicle charging demand forecasting using deep learning model. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 26, 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2021.1966627
30. Yu, L., Ge, X., Cai, C., & Wang, S. (2026, September). Short-term load forecasting for electric vehicle charging stations based on an adaptive multi-module cascaded framework. Energy and AI, 25, 100829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100829
31. Zhang, T., Tang, D., Fan, P., Wang, Q., & Wang, P. (2025a). A Probabilistic Graphical Model for Predicting Cascade Failures of Electric Vehicle Charging Networks Caused by Hurricanes. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16, 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3458932
32. Zhang, Y., Xu, T., Chen, T., Hu, Q., Chen, H., Hu, X., & Jiang, Z. (2025b). A high-resolution electric vehicle charging transaction dataset with multidimensional features in China. Scientific Data, 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04982-1