Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 26 - 32, 01.01.2019
https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM

Abstract

References

  • Anonymous, 2018a. SAS University Edition. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/university-edition.html (access date: 20.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018b. PAST. http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/, (Date of access: 15.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018c. MacAnova. http://www.stat.umn.edu/macanova/, (access date: 09.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018d. GNU PSPP. https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/, (access date: 01.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018e. Develve. https://develve.net, (access date: 10.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018f. IBM SPSS Modeler. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software, (access date: 26.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018g. Matlab. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html, (access date: 20.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018h. Minitab. http://www.minitab.com/en-us/, (access date: 05.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018i. Stata. https://www.stata.com, (access date: 25.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018j. Acastat. https://www.acastat.com, (access date: 25.08.2018).

Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 26 - 32, 01.01.2019
https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM

Abstract

The
specialized computer programs used in the collection, organization, analysis,
interpretation and presentation of the data are known as statistical software.
Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics are two main statistical
methodologies in some of the software used in data analysis. Descriptive
statistics summarizes data in a sample using indices such as mean or standard
deviation. Inferential statistics draws conclusions that are subject to random
variables such as observational errors and sampling variation. In this study,
statistical software used in data analysis is examined under two main headings
as open source (free) and licensed (paid). For this purpose, 5 most commonly
used software were selected from each groups. Statistical analyzes and analysis
outputs of this selected software have been examined comparatively. As a result
of this study, the features of licensed and unlicensed programs are presented
to the researchers in a comparative way.

References

  • Anonymous, 2018a. SAS University Edition. https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/university-edition.html (access date: 20.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018b. PAST. http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/, (Date of access: 15.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018c. MacAnova. http://www.stat.umn.edu/macanova/, (access date: 09.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018d. GNU PSPP. https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/, (access date: 01.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018e. Develve. https://develve.net, (access date: 10.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018f. IBM SPSS Modeler. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software, (access date: 26.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018g. Matlab. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html, (access date: 20.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018h. Minitab. http://www.minitab.com/en-us/, (access date: 05.08.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018i. Stata. https://www.stata.com, (access date: 25.07.2018).
  • Anonymous, 2018j. Acastat. https://www.acastat.com, (access date: 25.08.2018).
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Review
Authors

Ömer Faruk Karaokur 0000-0002-3436-8415

Fahrettin Kaya

Esra Yavuz

Aysel Yenipınar

Submission Date October 17, 2018
Acceptance Date December 4, 2018
Publication Date January 1, 2019
IZ https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Karaokur, Ö. F., Kaya, F., Yavuz, E., & Yenipınar, A. (2019). Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 2(1), 26-32. https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM
AMA 1.Karaokur ÖF, Kaya F, Yavuz E, Yenipınar A. Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2019;2(1):26-32. https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM
Chicago Karaokur, Ömer Faruk, Fahrettin Kaya, Esra Yavuz, and Aysel Yenipınar. 2019. “Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 2 (1): 26-32. https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM.
EndNote Karaokur ÖF, Kaya F, Yavuz E, Yenipınar A (January 1, 2019) Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 2 1 26–32.
IEEE [1]Ö. F. Karaokur, F. Kaya, E. Yavuz, and A. Yenipınar, “Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–32, Jan. 2019, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM
ISNAD Karaokur, Ömer Faruk - Kaya, Fahrettin - Yavuz, Esra - Yenipınar, Aysel. “Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 2/1 (January 1, 2019): 26-32. https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM.
JAMA 1.Karaokur ÖF, Kaya F, Yavuz E, Yenipınar A. Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2019;2:26–32.
MLA Karaokur, Ömer Faruk, et al. “Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 26-32, https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM.
Vancouver 1.Ömer Faruk Karaokur, Fahrettin Kaya, Esra Yavuz, Aysel Yenipınar. Comparison of Commonly Used Statistics Package Programs. BSJ Eng. Sci. [Internet]. 2019 Jan. 1;2(1):26-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA96PH83LM

                            24890