Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, , 183 - 191, 01.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.913392

Abstract

References

  • Albrecht G, 2006. Encyclopedia of Disability. California: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Beylikdüzü Kent Belleği, 2019. http://www.beylikduzukentbellegi.com/Icerik/Goruntule/327 (accessed date January 20, 2020).
  • Bulut Y, Atabeyoğlu Ö, Yeşil, P. 2008. Erzurum kent merkezi donati elemanlarinin ergonomik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir araştirma. Tarım Bilim Derg, 142: 131-138.
  • Carmona, M. 2010. Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
  • Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM, 1992. Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Çelikyay S, Karayılmazlar AS. 2016. Bartın Kent merkezindeki kamusal alanlarin kentsel ergonomi ve kent kimliği açisindan incelenmesi, J Bartin Fac Forest, 182: 224-238.
  • Erdönmez E, Ataol O. 2016. Kentsel kamusal alanlar – Beylikdüzü örneği. Beylikdüzü Belediyesi.
  • Gehl J, Gemzøe L. 2001. New City Spaces, Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
  • Gehl J. 1987. Life between buildings. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
  • Gehl J. 1996. Life between buildings: Using Public Space, Third Edition, Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
  • Gehl J. 2002. Public spaces and public life Jan Gehl, Architect MAA, Dr. Litt. & Helle Lis Søholt, Architect MAA, M.Arch. (Uni. of Wash. Strandgade 100, Bygning N, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Gehl J. 2004. Places for people city, of Melbourne in collaboration with GEHL. Architects, Urban Quality Consultants Copenhagen, Melbourne.
  • İnceoğlu, M. 2007. Kentsel açik mekânlarin kalite açisindan değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir yaklaşim: İstanbul Meydanlarının İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kántor N, Unger J. 2010. Benefits and opportunities of adopting gis in thermal comfort studies in resting places: An urban park as an example. Landscape Urban Plan, 98(1): 36-46.
  • Karayılmazlar A, Çeli̇kyay H. 2019. Kentsel alanlarin ve kent donatilarinin tasariminda ergonomik ilkeler. Bartın Orman Fak Derg, 21(2): 570-579.
  • Karayılmazlar AS. 2017. Kamusal alanlarin kentsel ergonomi açisindan irdelenmesi, Bartın örneği. Bartın Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Özdingiş N. 2007. İstanbul kent parklarının bedensel özürlüler açısından değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir araştırma, Yüksek lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Şişman, E.E. ve Yetim, L. 2004. Tekirdağ kentinde donatı elemanlarının peyzaj mimarlığı açısından irdelenmesi. Trakya Üniv Fen Bilim Derg, 5(1): 43-51.
  • Sungur A, Yıldız, S. 2013. Engelsiz Türkiye için: Yolun neresindeyiz? Mevcut durum ve öneriler, İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • URL 1. 2017. http://beylikduzuogretmenevi.meb.k12.tr/icerikler/kurum-ve-ilce-tarihcesi_3994268.html, (accessed date March 20, 2020).
  • URL 2. 2020. https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking, (accessed date March 20, 2020).
  • Wikipedia. 2021. Beylikdüzü. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beylikdüzü, (accessed date March 20, 2020).

Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square

Year 2021, , 183 - 191, 01.10.2021
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.913392

Abstract

Public spaces play a significant role in our social life. There are different types of public spaces and squares are one of the most important places in the cities that have influence on shaping our social activities from the past to the present. City squares are not just designed to spend time, in the past, squares were known as gathering locations to make important social decisions. A place where people share what is happening nearby and exchange information. Active and lively public spaces increase social interaction and sense of belonging among people. With the increase of population and urbanization in recent years, the quality of urban areas has been evaluated in terms of improving the quality of life of citizens. Squares are also important public spaces that are examined in terms of quality. In this paper, Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square comfort parameters are studied. This square is located in western part of Istanbul. Although this area is not very old but it is important due to the connection between the two areas of Esenyurt and Beylikdüzü. Comfort quality indicators of this location are examined. A questionnaire was collected from 71 people living in the area for this research. Their responses were studied and interpreted in line with the purpose of the research.

References

  • Albrecht G, 2006. Encyclopedia of Disability. California: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Beylikdüzü Kent Belleği, 2019. http://www.beylikduzukentbellegi.com/Icerik/Goruntule/327 (accessed date January 20, 2020).
  • Bulut Y, Atabeyoğlu Ö, Yeşil, P. 2008. Erzurum kent merkezi donati elemanlarinin ergonomik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir araştirma. Tarım Bilim Derg, 142: 131-138.
  • Carmona, M. 2010. Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
  • Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM, 1992. Public Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Çelikyay S, Karayılmazlar AS. 2016. Bartın Kent merkezindeki kamusal alanlarin kentsel ergonomi ve kent kimliği açisindan incelenmesi, J Bartin Fac Forest, 182: 224-238.
  • Erdönmez E, Ataol O. 2016. Kentsel kamusal alanlar – Beylikdüzü örneği. Beylikdüzü Belediyesi.
  • Gehl J, Gemzøe L. 2001. New City Spaces, Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
  • Gehl J. 1987. Life between buildings. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
  • Gehl J. 1996. Life between buildings: Using Public Space, Third Edition, Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
  • Gehl J. 2002. Public spaces and public life Jan Gehl, Architect MAA, Dr. Litt. & Helle Lis Søholt, Architect MAA, M.Arch. (Uni. of Wash. Strandgade 100, Bygning N, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Gehl J. 2004. Places for people city, of Melbourne in collaboration with GEHL. Architects, Urban Quality Consultants Copenhagen, Melbourne.
  • İnceoğlu, M. 2007. Kentsel açik mekânlarin kalite açisindan değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir yaklaşim: İstanbul Meydanlarının İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Kántor N, Unger J. 2010. Benefits and opportunities of adopting gis in thermal comfort studies in resting places: An urban park as an example. Landscape Urban Plan, 98(1): 36-46.
  • Karayılmazlar A, Çeli̇kyay H. 2019. Kentsel alanlarin ve kent donatilarinin tasariminda ergonomik ilkeler. Bartın Orman Fak Derg, 21(2): 570-579.
  • Karayılmazlar AS. 2017. Kamusal alanlarin kentsel ergonomi açisindan irdelenmesi, Bartın örneği. Bartın Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Özdingiş N. 2007. İstanbul kent parklarının bedensel özürlüler açısından değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir araştırma, Yüksek lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Şişman, E.E. ve Yetim, L. 2004. Tekirdağ kentinde donatı elemanlarının peyzaj mimarlığı açısından irdelenmesi. Trakya Üniv Fen Bilim Derg, 5(1): 43-51.
  • Sungur A, Yıldız, S. 2013. Engelsiz Türkiye için: Yolun neresindeyiz? Mevcut durum ve öneriler, İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • URL 1. 2017. http://beylikduzuogretmenevi.meb.k12.tr/icerikler/kurum-ve-ilce-tarihcesi_3994268.html, (accessed date March 20, 2020).
  • URL 2. 2020. https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking, (accessed date March 20, 2020).
  • Wikipedia. 2021. Beylikdüzü. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beylikdüzü, (accessed date March 20, 2020).
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Fatemeh Badel 0000-0003-2338-7407

Mehmet İnceoglu 0000-0001-5264-8755

Publication Date October 1, 2021
Submission Date April 11, 2021
Acceptance Date August 4, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Badel, F., & İnceoglu, M. (2021). Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(4), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.913392
AMA Badel F, İnceoglu M. Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square. BSJ Eng. Sci. October 2021;4(4):183-191. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.913392
Chicago Badel, Fatemeh, and Mehmet İnceoglu. “Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 4, no. 4 (October 2021): 183-91. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.913392.
EndNote Badel F, İnceoglu M (October 1, 2021) Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 4 4 183–191.
IEEE F. Badel and M. İnceoglu, “Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 183–191, 2021, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.913392.
ISNAD Badel, Fatemeh - İnceoglu, Mehmet. “Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 4/4 (October 2021), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.913392.
JAMA Badel F, İnceoglu M. Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2021;4:183–191.
MLA Badel, Fatemeh and Mehmet İnceoglu. “Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 4, no. 4, 2021, pp. 183-91, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.913392.
Vancouver Badel F, İnceoglu M. Reviewing Comfortability in City Squares: A Case Study of Beylikdüzü Özgürlük Square. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2021;4(4):183-91.

                                                24890