The Effects of Different Nitrogenous Fertilizer Sources and Doses on Football Field Grass Performances

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 365 - 373, 15.03.2024

Merve Marangoz , İbrahim Hosaflıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1440380

Abstract

Nitrogen has a huge importance in terms of ensuring the development of roots and shoots in grass and giving plants resistance to diseases. Using the right fertilizer in appropriate doses in the maintenance and repair of football fields is one of the maintenance procedures that increase grass performance. This study was carried out on the football field grass established at Iğdır University Sehit Bulent Yurtseven Campus during the 2020 vegetation period in Iğdır conditions. The research aimed to determine the most suitable fertilizer type and dose for football fields. The experiment was designed with three replications according to the randomized blocks factorial trial design. In the application area, a grass mixture of Festuca arundinacea Jaguar 4G 30%, Festuca arundinacea Apache 20%, Festuca arundinacea Arid III 20%, Lolium perenne Belida 15% and Lolium perenne Esquire 15% was used. As nitrogenous fertilizer sources, 20-10-10 7SO3, 15-5-20 + 2 CaO + MgO, ammonium sulfate (21% N) and urea (46% N) fertilizers are 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 g/m 2/ It was administered in monthly doses. In the study, the effects of nitrogen use in fertilization on grass plant height, quality, fresh grass amount, and leaf green tone and leaf texture were observed. As a result of the study, it was determined that the most ideal fertilizer type and dose were 6 and 8 g m-2 doses of urea and ammonium sulfate fertilizers.

Keywords

Nitrogen fertilizer type, Grass plants, Grass quality, Football field, Fertilizer dose

References

• AbdelKader HH. 2018. Effect of different fertilization programs on the growth characteristics and chemical composition of turfgrasses of five established football fields. Mansoura Univ J, 9(4): 315-320.
• Akdeniz H, Hosaflıoğlu I. 2016. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on some turfgrass characteristics of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). J Agri Sci Technol B, 6: 226-237.
• Anonymous. 2020a. Ankomer seed and agricultural industry trade limited company, URL: www.ankomer.com (cessed date: December 16, 2020).
• Anonymous. 2020b. Iğdır Provincial Directorate of Meteorology Data. Iğdır, Türkiye.
• Anonymous. 2020c. Iğdır University ALUM Soil Analysis Laboratory. Iğdır, Türkiye.
• Arslan M, Çakmakçı S. 2004. Determination of adaptation abilities and performances of different grass species and varieties in coastal conditions of Antalya province. J Fac Agri Akdeniz Univ, 17(1): 31-42.
• Avcıoğlu R, Geren H. 2012. Research on the performance of some warm climate grass wheat plants in Mediterranean climate. J Ege Univ Fac Agri, 22(1): 1-17.
• Beard JB. 1973. Turfgrass. Science and Culture, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, US, pp: 658.
• Gökçe V. 2019. Reed ball (Festuca arundinacea L.) from grass plant plants under Iğdır ecological conditions. The effect of different nitrogen (N) doses on grass quality elements. Bachelor's Thesis, Iğdır University, Institute of Science, Iğdır, Türkiye, pp: 23.
• Hosaflıoğlu İ. 2009. A research on the determination of wheat species and varieties that can be used in grass fields facility under Van conditions. PhD Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Van, Türkiye, pp: 52.
• Kaçar B. 1977. Bitki besleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 637, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 318.
• Karakurt E. 2003. Some morphological and phenological characters of green field grass species in Ankara/Haymana conditions. J Agri Sci, 10(3): 275-280.
• Kaş G. 2010. The effect of different fertilizer application and form times on the development of subsoil and above-ground components in English grass. MSc Thesis, ordu University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ordu, Türkiye, pp: 49.
• Kesemen E. 2008. Evaluation of plant characteristics of red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) using various nitrogen doses. MSc Thesis, Institute of Natural Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 54.
• Koçak M. 2019. Green field performances of some wheat grass plants planted lean and mixed: Tekirdağ/ Sultanköy example. MSc Thesis, Namık Kemal University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Tekirdağ, Türkiye, pp: 67.
• Köktaş Z. 2019. Some cool climate of different nitrogen sources affects on the development of lawn plants and lawn quality. MSc thesis, Uludağ University, Institute of Natural Sciences Bursa, Türkiye, pp: 57.
• Misia A. 1991. Effect of cool season turfgrass seed mixtures on lawn characteristics. Bull Fac Agri Univ Cairo, 42: 401-414.
• Mulvalı B. 1999. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer applications on the turf performances of some turfgrasses. MSc Thesis, Ege University, Institute of Natural Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye, pp: 75.
• Oral N, Açıkgöz R. 1999. Research on seed mixtures, October rates and nitrogen fertilizer applications for grass fields to be established in Bursa region. Turkey 3. Proceedings of the Field Crops Congress, November 15-18, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 155-159.
• Orçun E. 1979. Private garden architecture, lawn areas facility and maintenance technique. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Publication No: 152, İzmir, Türkiye, pp: 106.
• Özaydın E. 2019. Determination of adaptation and grass field characteristics of varieties belonging to some grass species in Şanlıurfa ecological conditions. MSc Thesis, Harran University, Institute of Science, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye, pp: 67.
• Salman A, Avcıoğlu R. 2010. The green field performances of some cool climate lawn plants in different fertilizer doses. J Ege Univ Fac Agri, 47(3: 1018-8851.
• Sills MJ, Carrow RN. 1983. Turfgrass growth, N use and water use under soil compaction and N fertilization. Argon J, 75: 488-492.
• Spangenberk BG, Fermanian TW, Wehner DV. 1986. Evalution of liquit-applied nitrogen fertilizers on Kentucky bluegrass Turf Argon J, 78: 1002-1006.
• Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach. 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, US, pp: 20-90.
• Türk M, Kılıç G. 2017. A reed ball of different nitrogen doses (Festuca arundinacea L.) the effects of varieties on grass field performance. J Suleyman Demirel Univ Inst Sci, 21(1): 31-37.
• Türk M, Sözören K. 2016. Perennial Grass of different nitrogen doses (Lolium perenne L.) the effects of varieties on grass field performance. J Süleyman Demirel Univ Fac Agri, 11(2): 99-107.
• Zengin S. 2019. English grass (Lolium perenne L.) from Lawn plant plants under Iğdır ecological conditions. The effect of different nitrogen (N) doses on grass quality elements. MSc Thesis, Iğdır University, Institute of Science, Iğdır, Türkiye, pp: 31.
• Zorer Ş, Hosaflıoğlu İ, Yılmaz İH. 2004. Determination of appropriate nitrogen fertilizer application times in lawn areas. Yüzüncü Yıl Univ Fac Agri J, 14(1): 27-34.