Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 1256 - 1262, 15.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1548273

Abstract

In this study, the decolorization of Acid Yellow 17, a mono azo dye with a wide range of applications such as in food, textiles, personal care products, and household cleaning products, was investigated in aqueous solutions using ozonation and peroxone processes. The effects of ozone gas flow rate (150, 200, and 250 L/h), ozone gas concentration (5.5, 11, and 16.5 g/m3), initial dye concentration (100, 200, and 300 mg/L), and hydrogen peroxide concentration (25, 50 and 62.5 mg/L) on decolorization in the batch bubble reactor were investigated. When the ozone gas flow rate was increased from 150 L/h to 200 L/h in the ozonation process, the removal efficiency increased from 70% to 80.2%. At gas flow rates above 200 L/h, removal was negatively affected. The removal efficiency increased with increasing ozone gas concentration, and at the end of the 45-minute reaction time, a removal efficiency of 98% was achieved at an ozone gas concentration of 16 g/m3. The increase in initial dye concentrations decreases the removal efficiency due to the increase in the amount of pollutant per unit ozone molecule. In the peroxane process, the effect of hydrogen peroxide on color removal was limited. It was determined that the ozonation process was more effective for the removal of Acid Yellow 17 from aqueous solutions.

Supporting Institution

the Research Fund of the Bayburt University

Project Number

Project Number: 2023/69002-05

References

  • Agrawal S, Chohadia A K, Sherry P, Malhotra G, Verma K. 2023. A Review on Wastewater Treatment Containing Organic Pollutants Using Advance Oxidation Processes. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol, 10 (1): 50-75
  • Alemu A, Kerie E. 2022. Removal of acid yellow 17 dye from aqueous solutions using activated water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Water Pract Technol, 17(6): 1294–1304.
  • Bilińska L, Gmurek M, Ledakowicz S. 2017. Textile wastewater treatment by AOPs for brine reuse. Process Saf Environ Prot, 109: 420–428.
  • Boczkaj G, Fernandes A. 2017. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes at basic pH conditions: A review. Chem Eng J, 320: 608–633.
  • Chen H, Wang J. 2021. Degradation and mineralization of ofloxacin by ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) process. Chemosphere, 269: 128775.
  • Çobanoğlu K, Değermenci N. 2022. Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions. Environ Monit Assess, 194(4): 302.
  • Değermenci G D. 2021. Removal of reactive azo dye using platinum-coated titanium electrodes with the electro-oxidation process. Desalination Water Treat, 218: 436–443.
  • Değermenci N, Değermenci G D, Ulu H B. 2019. Decolorization of reactive azo dye from aqueous solutions with fenton oxidation process: Effect of system parameters and kinetic study. Desalination Water Treat, 169: 363–371.
  • Duong P H, Huynh N H T, Yoon Y S. 2022. Treatment of C.I Reactive Blue 160 by ozonation system. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 964-1: 012030
  • Gągol M, Przyjazny A, Boczkaj G. 2018. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation – A review. Chem Eng J, 338: 599–627.
  • Gao J, Zhang Q, Su K, Chen R, Peng Y. 2010. Biosorption of Acid Yellow 17 from aqueous solution by non-living aerobic granular sludge. J Hazard Mater, 174(1–3): 215–225.
  • Gao M, Zeng Z, Sun B, Zou H, Chen J, Shao L. 2012. Ozonation of azo dye Acid Red 14 in a microporous tube-in-tube microchannel reactor: Decolorization and mechanism. Chemosphere, 89(2): 190–197.
  • Gautam P, Kumar S, Lokhandwala S. 2019. Advanced oxidation processes for treatment of leachate from hazardous waste landfill: A critical review. J Clean Prod, 237: 117639.
  • Iqbal A, Yusaf A, Usman M, Hussain Bokhari T, Mansha A. 2023. Insight into the degradation of different classes of dyes by advanced oxidation processes; a detailed review. Int J Environ Anal Chem, 1 35.
  • Kannaujiya M C, Prajapati A K, Mandal T, Das A K, Mondal M K. 2023. Extensive analyses of mass transfer, kinetics, and toxicity for hazardous acid yellow 17 dye removal using activated carbon prepared from waste biomass of Solanum melongena. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 13(1): 99–117.
  • Khan J, Sayed M, Ali F, Khan H M. 2018. Removal of Acid Yellow 17 Dye by Fenton Oxidation Process. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie, 232(4): 507–525.
  • Konsowa A H. 2003. Decolorization of wastewater containing direct dye by ozonation in a batch bubble column reactor. Desalination, 158(1–3): 233–240.
  • Loures C C A, Alcântara M A K, Filho H J I, Teixeira A C S C, Silva F T, Paiva T C B, Samanamud G R L. 2013. Advanced Oxidative Degradation Processes: Fundamentals and Applications. International Review of Chemical Engineering, 5(2): 102–120.
  • Muhammad M, Tariq M, Khan J, Ullah I. 2024. The efficacy of UV/PMS/Cu-Co@TiO2 system for the removal of SKB-6B and AY-17 dye in aqueous medium. Desalination Water Treat, 318: 100395.
  • Muthukumar M, Sargunamani D, Selvakumar N. 2005. Statistical analysis of the effect of aromatic, azo and sulphonic acid groups on decolouration of acid dye effluents using advanced oxidation processes. Dyes Pigm, 65(2): 151–158.
  • Pham C M, Pham N Q, Le A K. 2022. Oxidation-Reduction Potential and Peroxone Process in Antibiotic Residues Removal from Hospital Wastewater. Chem Eng Trans, 97: 187–192.
  • Priyadarshini M, Das I, Ghangrekar M M, Blaney L. 2022. Advanced oxidation processes: Performance, advantages, and scale-up of emerging technologies. J Environ Manage, 316: 115295.
  • Ranjithkumar V, Sangeetha S, Vairam S. 2014. Synthesis of magnetic activated carbon/α-Fe2O3 nanocomposite and its application in the removal of acid yellow 17 dye from water. J Hazard Mater, 273: 127–135.
  • Sun K, Yuan D, Liu Y, Song Y, Sun Z, Liu R. 2020. Study on the efficiency and mechanism of Direct Red 80 dye by conventional ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) treatment. Sep Sci Technol, 55-17: 3175–3183.
  • Tehrani-Bagha A R, Mahmoodi N M, Menger F M. 2010. Degradation of a persistent organic dye from colored textile wastewater by ozonation. Desalination, 260(1–3): 34–38.
  • Teli M D, Nadathur G T. 2018. Adsorptive removal of acid yellow 17 (an anionic dye) from water by novel ionene chloride modified electrospun silica nanofibres. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(6): 7257–7272.
  • Tizaoui C, Grima N. 2011. Kinetics of the ozone oxidation of Reactive Orange 16 azo-dye in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J, 173(2): 463–473.
  • Turhan K, Durukan I, Ozturkcan S A, Turgut Z. 2012. Decolorization of textile basic dye in aqueous solution by ozone. Dyes Pigm, 92(3): 897–901.
  • Turhan K, Turgut Z. 2009. Decolorization of direct dye in textile wastewater by ozonization in a semi-batch bubble column reactor. Desalination, 242(1–3): 256–263.
  • Zhang R, Yuan D X, Liu B. M. 2015. Kinetics and products of ozonation of C.I. Reactive Red 195 in a semi-batch reactor. Chin Chem Lett, 26(1): 93–99.

Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 6, 1256 - 1262, 15.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1548273

Abstract

In this study, the decolorization of Acid Yellow 17, a mono azo dye with a wide range of applications such as in food, textiles, personal care products, and household cleaning products, was investigated in aqueous solutions using ozonation and peroxone processes. The effects of ozone gas flow rate (150, 200, and 250 L/h), ozone gas concentration (5.5, 11, and 16.5 g/m3), initial dye concentration (100, 200, and 300 mg/L), and hydrogen peroxide concentration (25, 50 and 62.5 mg/L) on decolorization in the batch bubble reactor were investigated. When the ozone gas flow rate was increased from 150 L/h to 200 L/h in the ozonation process, the removal efficiency increased from 70% to 80.2%. At gas flow rates above 200 L/h, removal was negatively affected. The removal efficiency increased with increasing ozone gas concentration, and at the end of the 45-minute reaction time, a removal efficiency of 98% was achieved at an ozone gas concentration of 16 g/m3. The increase in initial dye concentrations decreases the removal efficiency due to the increase in the amount of pollutant per unit ozone molecule. In the peroxane process, the effect of hydrogen peroxide on color removal was limited. It was determined that the ozonation process was more effective for the removal of Acid Yellow 17 from aqueous solutions.

Project Number

Project Number: 2023/69002-05

References

  • Agrawal S, Chohadia A K, Sherry P, Malhotra G, Verma K. 2023. A Review on Wastewater Treatment Containing Organic Pollutants Using Advance Oxidation Processes. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol, 10 (1): 50-75
  • Alemu A, Kerie E. 2022. Removal of acid yellow 17 dye from aqueous solutions using activated water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Water Pract Technol, 17(6): 1294–1304.
  • Bilińska L, Gmurek M, Ledakowicz S. 2017. Textile wastewater treatment by AOPs for brine reuse. Process Saf Environ Prot, 109: 420–428.
  • Boczkaj G, Fernandes A. 2017. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes at basic pH conditions: A review. Chem Eng J, 320: 608–633.
  • Chen H, Wang J. 2021. Degradation and mineralization of ofloxacin by ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) process. Chemosphere, 269: 128775.
  • Çobanoğlu K, Değermenci N. 2022. Comparison of reactive azo dye removal with UV/H2O2, UV/S2O82− and UV/HSO5− processes in aqueous solutions. Environ Monit Assess, 194(4): 302.
  • Değermenci G D. 2021. Removal of reactive azo dye using platinum-coated titanium electrodes with the electro-oxidation process. Desalination Water Treat, 218: 436–443.
  • Değermenci N, Değermenci G D, Ulu H B. 2019. Decolorization of reactive azo dye from aqueous solutions with fenton oxidation process: Effect of system parameters and kinetic study. Desalination Water Treat, 169: 363–371.
  • Duong P H, Huynh N H T, Yoon Y S. 2022. Treatment of C.I Reactive Blue 160 by ozonation system. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 964-1: 012030
  • Gągol M, Przyjazny A, Boczkaj G. 2018. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation – A review. Chem Eng J, 338: 599–627.
  • Gao J, Zhang Q, Su K, Chen R, Peng Y. 2010. Biosorption of Acid Yellow 17 from aqueous solution by non-living aerobic granular sludge. J Hazard Mater, 174(1–3): 215–225.
  • Gao M, Zeng Z, Sun B, Zou H, Chen J, Shao L. 2012. Ozonation of azo dye Acid Red 14 in a microporous tube-in-tube microchannel reactor: Decolorization and mechanism. Chemosphere, 89(2): 190–197.
  • Gautam P, Kumar S, Lokhandwala S. 2019. Advanced oxidation processes for treatment of leachate from hazardous waste landfill: A critical review. J Clean Prod, 237: 117639.
  • Iqbal A, Yusaf A, Usman M, Hussain Bokhari T, Mansha A. 2023. Insight into the degradation of different classes of dyes by advanced oxidation processes; a detailed review. Int J Environ Anal Chem, 1 35.
  • Kannaujiya M C, Prajapati A K, Mandal T, Das A K, Mondal M K. 2023. Extensive analyses of mass transfer, kinetics, and toxicity for hazardous acid yellow 17 dye removal using activated carbon prepared from waste biomass of Solanum melongena. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 13(1): 99–117.
  • Khan J, Sayed M, Ali F, Khan H M. 2018. Removal of Acid Yellow 17 Dye by Fenton Oxidation Process. Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie, 232(4): 507–525.
  • Konsowa A H. 2003. Decolorization of wastewater containing direct dye by ozonation in a batch bubble column reactor. Desalination, 158(1–3): 233–240.
  • Loures C C A, Alcântara M A K, Filho H J I, Teixeira A C S C, Silva F T, Paiva T C B, Samanamud G R L. 2013. Advanced Oxidative Degradation Processes: Fundamentals and Applications. International Review of Chemical Engineering, 5(2): 102–120.
  • Muhammad M, Tariq M, Khan J, Ullah I. 2024. The efficacy of UV/PMS/Cu-Co@TiO2 system for the removal of SKB-6B and AY-17 dye in aqueous medium. Desalination Water Treat, 318: 100395.
  • Muthukumar M, Sargunamani D, Selvakumar N. 2005. Statistical analysis of the effect of aromatic, azo and sulphonic acid groups on decolouration of acid dye effluents using advanced oxidation processes. Dyes Pigm, 65(2): 151–158.
  • Pham C M, Pham N Q, Le A K. 2022. Oxidation-Reduction Potential and Peroxone Process in Antibiotic Residues Removal from Hospital Wastewater. Chem Eng Trans, 97: 187–192.
  • Priyadarshini M, Das I, Ghangrekar M M, Blaney L. 2022. Advanced oxidation processes: Performance, advantages, and scale-up of emerging technologies. J Environ Manage, 316: 115295.
  • Ranjithkumar V, Sangeetha S, Vairam S. 2014. Synthesis of magnetic activated carbon/α-Fe2O3 nanocomposite and its application in the removal of acid yellow 17 dye from water. J Hazard Mater, 273: 127–135.
  • Sun K, Yuan D, Liu Y, Song Y, Sun Z, Liu R. 2020. Study on the efficiency and mechanism of Direct Red 80 dye by conventional ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) treatment. Sep Sci Technol, 55-17: 3175–3183.
  • Tehrani-Bagha A R, Mahmoodi N M, Menger F M. 2010. Degradation of a persistent organic dye from colored textile wastewater by ozonation. Desalination, 260(1–3): 34–38.
  • Teli M D, Nadathur G T. 2018. Adsorptive removal of acid yellow 17 (an anionic dye) from water by novel ionene chloride modified electrospun silica nanofibres. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(6): 7257–7272.
  • Tizaoui C, Grima N. 2011. Kinetics of the ozone oxidation of Reactive Orange 16 azo-dye in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J, 173(2): 463–473.
  • Turhan K, Durukan I, Ozturkcan S A, Turgut Z. 2012. Decolorization of textile basic dye in aqueous solution by ozone. Dyes Pigm, 92(3): 897–901.
  • Turhan K, Turgut Z. 2009. Decolorization of direct dye in textile wastewater by ozonization in a semi-batch bubble column reactor. Desalination, 242(1–3): 256–263.
  • Zhang R, Yuan D X, Liu B. M. 2015. Kinetics and products of ozonation of C.I. Reactive Red 195 in a semi-batch reactor. Chin Chem Lett, 26(1): 93–99.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Waste Management, Reduction, Reuse and Recycling, Clean Production Technologies, Water Treatment Processes
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

İbrahim Cengiz 0000-0003-3171-6629

Project Number Project Number: 2023/69002-05
Publication Date November 15, 2024
Submission Date September 11, 2024
Acceptance Date October 17, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 7 Issue: 6

Cite

APA Cengiz, İ. (2024). Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 7(6), 1256-1262. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1548273
AMA Cengiz İ. Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process. BSJ Eng. Sci. November 2024;7(6):1256-1262. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1548273
Chicago Cengiz, İbrahim. “Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by Ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 7, no. 6 (November 2024): 1256-62. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1548273.
EndNote Cengiz İ (November 1, 2024) Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 7 6 1256–1262.
IEEE İ. Cengiz, “Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1256–1262, 2024, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1548273.
ISNAD Cengiz, İbrahim. “Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by Ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 7/6 (November 2024), 1256-1262. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1548273.
JAMA Cengiz İ. Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2024;7:1256–1262.
MLA Cengiz, İbrahim. “Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by Ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 7, no. 6, 2024, pp. 1256-62, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1548273.
Vancouver Cengiz İ. Decolorization of Acid Yellow 17 by ozonation and Peroxone (O3/H2O2) Process. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2024;7(6):1256-62.

                                                24890