Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 970 - 981, 15.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1645207

Abstract

The nonlinear convection-reaction-diffusion equations model complex real-world phenomena across scientific and engineering disciplines. However, solving these equations analytically is often impossible due to their nonlinear nature. As a result, researchers have turned to numerical and computational methods to find approximate solutions. These methods, while effective, can struggle with issues such as stability, accuracy, and the ability to handle sharp gradients or complex interactions between convection, diffusion, and reaction terms. To address these challenges, this work introduces an enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework for convection-reaction-diffusion equations that incorporates exponential finite difference scheme residuals with the aim of enhancing solution accuracy and stability. To validate its performance, the framework has been tested on four well-known nonlinear partial differential equations: Burgers' Equation, Fisher's Equation, the Burgers-Huxley Equation, and the Newell-Whitehead-Segel Equation. The results obtained using the modified PINN framework are systematically compared with those obtained using traditional Physics-Informed Neural Networks and the Galerkin Finite Element Method. The comparisons reveal that the proposed framework consistently outperforms both approaches in terms of accuracy. These improvements highlight the effectiveness of integrating exponential finite difference scheme residuals into the PINN framework, making it a powerful and reliable tool for solving nonlinear convection-reaction-diffusion equations.

References

  • Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Xiao Z, Monga R, Moore S, Murray D, Steiner B, Tucker P, Vasudevan V, Warden P, Wicke M, Yu Y. 2015. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. Mountain View, CA: TensorFlow.
  • Ali H, Kamrujjaman M, Islam MS. 2022. An advanced Galerkin approach to solve the nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations with different boundary conditions. J Math Res, 14(1): pp: 30–45.
  • Bahadır AR. 2005. Exponential finite-difference method applied to Korteweg–de Vries equation for small times. Appl Math Comput, 160(3): pp: 675–682.
  • Barth T, Jespersen D. 1989. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. 27th Aerospace Sci Meet, Paper No: 89-0366.
  • Baydin AG, Pearlmutter BA, Radul AA, Siskind JM. 2018. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey. J Mach Learn Res, 18(153): pp: 1–43.
  • Bejan A. 2013. Convection heat transfer. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp: 688.
  • Bezekci B. 2025. Deep learning-enhanced regularization of irregular traveling pulses in the FitzHugh–Nagumo model. SN Comput Sci, 6: pp: 206.
  • Bezekci B. 2025. The efficacy of Haar wavelets in addressing discontinuities of McKean equations with Heaviside functions. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ J Inst Sci, 8(1): pp: 200–210.
  • Bhattacharya MC. 1985. An explicit conditionally stable finite difference equation for heat conduction problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 21(2): pp: 239–265.
  • Burgers JM. 1948. A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Adv Appl Mech, 1: pp: 171–199.
  • Costa R, Clain S, Loubère R, Machado GJ. 2018. Very high-order accurate finite volume scheme on curved boundaries for the two-dimensional steady-state convection–diffusion equation with Dirichlet condition. Appl Math Model, 54: pp: 752–767.
  • Cross MC, Hohenberg PC. 1993. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Rev Mod Phys, 65(3): pp: 851.
  • Dong X, Li W, Liu Q, Wang H. 2022. Research on convection-reaction-diffusion model of contaminants in fracturing flowback fluid in non-equidistant fractures with arbitrary inclination of shale gas development. J Pet Sci Eng, 208: 109479.
  • Fisher RA. 1937. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugen, 7(4): pp: 355–369.
  • Handschuh RF, Keith TG Jr. 1992. Applications of an exponential finite-difference technique. Numer Heat Transfer A, 22(3): pp: 363–378.
  • Harten A. 1997. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys, 135(2): pp: 260–278.
  • Hasan F, Ali H, Arief HA. 2024. From mesh to neural nets: A multi-method evaluation of physics-informed neural networks and Galerkin finite element method for solving nonlinear convection–reaction–diffusion equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09704.
  • Hennigh O, Narasimhan S, Nabian MA, Subramaniam A, Tangsali K, Fang Z, Rietmann M, Byeon W, Choudhry S, Ferguson M, Pfaff T, Tompson J. 2021. NVIDIA SimNet™: An AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework. In: Int Conf Comput Sci, Springer, pp: 447–461.
  • Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol, 117(4): pp: 500.
  • Inan B, Bahadir AR. 2013. Numerical solution of the one-dimensional Burgers’ equation: Implicit and fully implicit exponential finite difference methods. Pramana, 81: pp: 547–556.
  • Jagtap AD, Mao Z, Adams N, Karniadakis GE. 2022. Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. J Comput Phys, 466: 111402.
  • John V, Schmeyer E. 2008. Finite element methods for time-dependent convection–diffusion–reaction equations with small diffusion. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 198(3–4): pp: 475–494.
  • Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L. 2021. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys, 3: pp: 422–440.
  • Keener J, Sneyd J. 2009. Mathematical physiology: II: Systems physiology. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp: 574.
  • Kerner BS. 1999. The physics of traffic. Phys World, 12(8): pp: 25.
  • Kingma DP, Ba J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  • Koren B. 1993. A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms (Vol. 45). Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 56.
  • Liu DC, Nocedal J. 1989. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math Program, 45(1): pp: 503–528.
  • Lu L, Meng X, Mao Z, Karniadakis GE. 2021. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations. SIAM Rev, 63(1): pp: 208–228.
  • Morton KW. 1996. Numerical solution of convection-diffusion problems. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp: 232.
  • Murray JD. 2007. Mathematical biology: I. An introduction (Vol. 17). Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp: 551.
  • Nekhamkina OA, Nepomnyashchy AA, Rubinstein BY, Sheintuch M. 2000. Nonlinear analysis of stationary patterns in convection-reaction-diffusion systems. Phys Rev E, 61(3): pp: 2436.
  • Newell AC, Whitehead JA. 1969. Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection. J Fluid Mech, 38(2): pp: 279–303.
  • Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, Yang E, DeVito Z, Lin Z, Desmaison A, Antiga L, Lerer A. 2019. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, pp:32.
  • Peddavarapu S, Srinivasan R. 2021. Local maximum entropy approximation-based streamline upwind Petrov–Galerkin meshfree method for convection–diffusion problem. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 43(6): 326.
  • Phongthanapanich S, Dechaumphai P. 2008. A characteristic-based finite volume element method for convection-diffusion-reaction equation. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng, 32(3–4): pp: 549–560.
  • Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys, 378: pp: 686–707.
  • Sahli Costabal F, Yang Y, Perdikaris P, Hurtado DE, Kuhl E. 2020. Physics-informed neural networks for cardiac activation mapping. Front Phys, 8: 42.
  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN. 1998. From air pollution to climate change. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp: 1326.
  • Tarantola A. 2005. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp: 342.
  • Tian ZF, Dai SQ. 2007. High-order compact exponential finite difference methods for convection–diffusion type problems. J Comput Phys, 220(2): pp: 952–974.

The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 970 - 981, 15.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1645207

Abstract

The nonlinear convection-reaction-diffusion equations model complex real-world phenomena across scientific and engineering disciplines. However, solving these equations analytically is often impossible due to their nonlinear nature. As a result, researchers have turned to numerical and computational methods to find approximate solutions. These methods, while effective, can struggle with issues such as stability, accuracy, and the ability to handle sharp gradients or complex interactions between convection, diffusion, and reaction terms. To address these challenges, this work introduces an enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework for convection-reaction-diffusion equations that incorporates exponential finite difference scheme residuals with the aim of enhancing solution accuracy and stability. To validate its performance, the framework has been tested on four well-known nonlinear partial differential equations: Burgers' Equation, Fisher's Equation, the Burgers-Huxley Equation, and the Newell-Whitehead-Segel Equation. The results obtained using the modified PINN framework are systematically compared with those obtained using traditional Physics-Informed Neural Networks and the Galerkin Finite Element Method. The comparisons reveal that the proposed framework consistently outperforms both approaches in terms of accuracy. These improvements highlight the effectiveness of integrating exponential finite difference scheme residuals into the PINN framework, making it a powerful and reliable tool for solving nonlinear convection-reaction-diffusion equations.

References

  • Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Xiao Z, Monga R, Moore S, Murray D, Steiner B, Tucker P, Vasudevan V, Warden P, Wicke M, Yu Y. 2015. TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. Mountain View, CA: TensorFlow.
  • Ali H, Kamrujjaman M, Islam MS. 2022. An advanced Galerkin approach to solve the nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations with different boundary conditions. J Math Res, 14(1): pp: 30–45.
  • Bahadır AR. 2005. Exponential finite-difference method applied to Korteweg–de Vries equation for small times. Appl Math Comput, 160(3): pp: 675–682.
  • Barth T, Jespersen D. 1989. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. 27th Aerospace Sci Meet, Paper No: 89-0366.
  • Baydin AG, Pearlmutter BA, Radul AA, Siskind JM. 2018. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey. J Mach Learn Res, 18(153): pp: 1–43.
  • Bejan A. 2013. Convection heat transfer. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp: 688.
  • Bezekci B. 2025. Deep learning-enhanced regularization of irregular traveling pulses in the FitzHugh–Nagumo model. SN Comput Sci, 6: pp: 206.
  • Bezekci B. 2025. The efficacy of Haar wavelets in addressing discontinuities of McKean equations with Heaviside functions. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ J Inst Sci, 8(1): pp: 200–210.
  • Bhattacharya MC. 1985. An explicit conditionally stable finite difference equation for heat conduction problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng, 21(2): pp: 239–265.
  • Burgers JM. 1948. A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Adv Appl Mech, 1: pp: 171–199.
  • Costa R, Clain S, Loubère R, Machado GJ. 2018. Very high-order accurate finite volume scheme on curved boundaries for the two-dimensional steady-state convection–diffusion equation with Dirichlet condition. Appl Math Model, 54: pp: 752–767.
  • Cross MC, Hohenberg PC. 1993. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Rev Mod Phys, 65(3): pp: 851.
  • Dong X, Li W, Liu Q, Wang H. 2022. Research on convection-reaction-diffusion model of contaminants in fracturing flowback fluid in non-equidistant fractures with arbitrary inclination of shale gas development. J Pet Sci Eng, 208: 109479.
  • Fisher RA. 1937. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugen, 7(4): pp: 355–369.
  • Handschuh RF, Keith TG Jr. 1992. Applications of an exponential finite-difference technique. Numer Heat Transfer A, 22(3): pp: 363–378.
  • Harten A. 1997. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys, 135(2): pp: 260–278.
  • Hasan F, Ali H, Arief HA. 2024. From mesh to neural nets: A multi-method evaluation of physics-informed neural networks and Galerkin finite element method for solving nonlinear convection–reaction–diffusion equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09704.
  • Hennigh O, Narasimhan S, Nabian MA, Subramaniam A, Tangsali K, Fang Z, Rietmann M, Byeon W, Choudhry S, Ferguson M, Pfaff T, Tompson J. 2021. NVIDIA SimNet™: An AI-accelerated multi-physics simulation framework. In: Int Conf Comput Sci, Springer, pp: 447–461.
  • Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol, 117(4): pp: 500.
  • Inan B, Bahadir AR. 2013. Numerical solution of the one-dimensional Burgers’ equation: Implicit and fully implicit exponential finite difference methods. Pramana, 81: pp: 547–556.
  • Jagtap AD, Mao Z, Adams N, Karniadakis GE. 2022. Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flows. J Comput Phys, 466: 111402.
  • John V, Schmeyer E. 2008. Finite element methods for time-dependent convection–diffusion–reaction equations with small diffusion. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 198(3–4): pp: 475–494.
  • Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis IG, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L. 2021. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat Rev Phys, 3: pp: 422–440.
  • Keener J, Sneyd J. 2009. Mathematical physiology: II: Systems physiology. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp: 574.
  • Kerner BS. 1999. The physics of traffic. Phys World, 12(8): pp: 25.
  • Kingma DP, Ba J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  • Koren B. 1993. A robust upwind discretization method for advection, diffusion and source terms (Vol. 45). Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 56.
  • Liu DC, Nocedal J. 1989. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math Program, 45(1): pp: 503–528.
  • Lu L, Meng X, Mao Z, Karniadakis GE. 2021. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations. SIAM Rev, 63(1): pp: 208–228.
  • Morton KW. 1996. Numerical solution of convection-diffusion problems. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp: 232.
  • Murray JD. 2007. Mathematical biology: I. An introduction (Vol. 17). Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp: 551.
  • Nekhamkina OA, Nepomnyashchy AA, Rubinstein BY, Sheintuch M. 2000. Nonlinear analysis of stationary patterns in convection-reaction-diffusion systems. Phys Rev E, 61(3): pp: 2436.
  • Newell AC, Whitehead JA. 1969. Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection. J Fluid Mech, 38(2): pp: 279–303.
  • Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, Yang E, DeVito Z, Lin Z, Desmaison A, Antiga L, Lerer A. 2019. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, pp:32.
  • Peddavarapu S, Srinivasan R. 2021. Local maximum entropy approximation-based streamline upwind Petrov–Galerkin meshfree method for convection–diffusion problem. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng, 43(6): 326.
  • Phongthanapanich S, Dechaumphai P. 2008. A characteristic-based finite volume element method for convection-diffusion-reaction equation. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng, 32(3–4): pp: 549–560.
  • Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. 2019. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys, 378: pp: 686–707.
  • Sahli Costabal F, Yang Y, Perdikaris P, Hurtado DE, Kuhl E. 2020. Physics-informed neural networks for cardiac activation mapping. Front Phys, 8: 42.
  • Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN. 1998. From air pollution to climate change. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp: 1326.
  • Tarantola A. 2005. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp: 342.
  • Tian ZF, Dai SQ. 2007. High-order compact exponential finite difference methods for convection–diffusion type problems. J Comput Phys, 220(2): pp: 952–974.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Reaction Kinetics and Dynamics, Statistical Data Science, Dynamical Systems in Applications, Applied Mathematics (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Burhan Bezekçi 0000-0001-7460-4091

Early Pub Date May 5, 2025
Publication Date July 15, 2025
Submission Date February 26, 2025
Acceptance Date April 4, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Bezekçi, B. (2025). The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(4), 970-981. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1645207
AMA Bezekçi B. The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes. BSJ Eng. Sci. July 2025;8(4):970-981. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1645207
Chicago Bezekçi, Burhan. “The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8, no. 4 (July 2025): 970-81. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1645207.
EndNote Bezekçi B (July 1, 2025) The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8 4 970–981.
IEEE B. Bezekçi, “The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 970–981, 2025, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1645207.
ISNAD Bezekçi, Burhan. “The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8/4 (July 2025), 970-981. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1645207.
JAMA Bezekçi B. The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2025;8:970–981.
MLA Bezekçi, Burhan. “The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 8, no. 4, 2025, pp. 970-81, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1645207.
Vancouver Bezekçi B. The Refined Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Convection-Reaction-Diffusion Equations Using Exponential Schemes. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2025;8(4):970-81.

                                                24890