A macroanatomic, morphometric and comparative investigation on skeletal system of the geese growing in Kars region II; Skeleton appendiculare

Year 2021, , 6 - 16, 01.01.2021

Gülseren Kırbaş Doğan , İsmet Takcı

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.800479

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to comparatively, morphometrically and macroanatomically investigate skeleton appendiculare. A
total of 24 goose cadavers were used. Scapula length was 107.31 ± 1.05 mm in female geese; it was 116.63 ± 0.65 mm in male geese.
While the length of the os coracoideum was 78.5 ± 0.6 mm in female geese; it was detected as 87 ± 0.8 mm in male geese. The clavicula
length was 66.90 ± 0.71 mm in female geese and it was 73.39 ± 0.59 mm in male geese and it was determined that both clavicula
shaped furcula with a distinct curvature. While the length of the humerus in female geese was 175.02 ± 1.59 mm; it was measured as
191.28 ± 1.44 mm in male ones. While the mean ulna height was 162.60 ± 1.26 mm in female geese; it was determined as 178.84 ± 0.83
mm in male geese. The mean radius length was measured as 154.20 ± 1.63 mm in female geese, it was 169.75 ± 1.31 mm in male geese.
It was detected that os carpi radiale was in a triangular shape, os carpi ulnare was in the form of a pipe. It was determined that the
height of carpometacarpus was 94.57 ± 0.75 mm in female geese; 100.95 ± 1.03 mm was in male geese. Pelvis length was measured as
154.27 ± 1.81 mm in female geese; it was 169.91 ± 1.68 mm in male geese. While femur length was detected as 86.85 ± 0.98 mm in
female geese; it was 93.87 ± 1.12 mm in male geese. While tibiotarsus length was 160.94 ± 1.88 mm in female geese; it was 174.20 ±
1.28 mm in male ones. While the tarsometatarsus length was 93.15 ± 1.19 mm in female geese; it was measured as 101.64 ± 0.88 mm
in male geese. As a result, in this study, thought that obtained findings will contribute in scientific research, evaluations of sexual
dimorphism, zooarchaeological studies and operations on poultry animals.

Keywords

Anatomy, Goose, Kars, Poultry, Skeleton appendiculare

References

• Allison R, Tumarkin-Deratzian, David RV, Peter D. 2006. Bone surface texture as an ontogenetic indicator in long bones of the Canada goose Branta canadensis (Anseriformes: Anatidae). Zool J Linnean Soc, 148: 133-168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00232.x.
• Aslan C. 2013. Kaz besleme ve yetiştiriciliği, Genişletilmiş 2. baskı, Medipres Matbaacılık Yayıncılık Lt. Şti, Malatya, Turkey.
• Atalar Ö, Kürtül İ, Özdemir D. 2007. Morphological and morphometric approach to the bones of the wings in the Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo Rufinus). FÜ Sağ Bil Derg, 21: 163-166.
• Başoğul M, Beşoluk K. 2016. Kaya kekliği (Alectoris graeca) ve sülünlerde (Phasianus colchicus) bacak kemikleri (Ossa membri pelvini) üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makro anatomik araştırmalar. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 1: 13-22.
• Charuta A, Bartyzel BJ, Karbowicz M, Kobryń H. 2005. Morphology and morphometry of the antebrachial skeleton and bones of hand of the domestic Pekin duck. Vet Med Zoot, 51: 26-30.
• Çevik Demirkan A, Kürtül İ, Hazıroğlu RM. 2006. Gross morphological features of the lung and air sac in the Japanese quail. J Vet Med Sci, 68: 909-913.
• Çevik Demirkan A. 2002. Ördekte iskelet sistemi. AÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, PhD. Thesis, Ankara.
• Demirsoy A. 1995. Yaşamın temel kuralları. omurgalılar/amniyota (sürüngenler, kuşlar ve memeliler). Vol. 3, Bölüm 2, Meteksan Yayınevi, Ankara, Turkey.
• Dursun N. 2007. Evcil kuşların anatomisi. Medisan yayınevi, 11. Baskı, Ankara, Turkey.
• Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. 1987. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. Philadelphia, USA.
• Gültekin M.1966. Evcil memeli ve kanatlıların karşılaştırmalı osteologia’sı. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara, Turkey.
• Gültekin M.1957. Yerli tavuk ve horoz iskeleti ile yerli hindi iskeleti arasındaki sabit makro-anatomik ayrımlar üzerinde incelemeler. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 4: 6-14.
• Hogg DA. 1984a. The development of pneumatisation in the postcranial skeleton of the domestic fowl. J Anat, 139: 105-113.
• Hogg DA. 1984b. The distribution of pneumatisation in the skeleton of the adult domestic fowl. J Anat, 138: 617-629.
• Kılıç E, Yayla S, Ermutlu CŞ, Aydın U. 2018. Köpek yavrularında diafizer femur kırığının sağaltımı için kaz radius’u kullanımı. V. International Multidisciplinary Congress of Eurasia, Barcelona-Spain, 24-26 July.
• King AS, McLelland J. 1984. Birds their structure and function. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK.
• King AS, McLelland J. 1975. Outlines of avian anatomy. Bailliere Tindal, London, UK.
• King AS. 1957. The aerated bones of gallus domesticus. Acta Anat, 31: 220-230.
• König HE, Korbel R, Liebich HG. 2016. Avian anatomy textbook and colour atlas. 5m publishing, 2. Edition, Sheffield, UK.
• Kuru, M. 1987. Omurgalı hayvanlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Yayınları, Erzurum, Turkey.
• Lök S, Yalçın H. 2007. Kaya kekliği (A. Graeca) ve sülünlerde (P. Colchicus) kanat kemikleri (ossea alae) üzerinde karşılaştırmalı makroanatomik araştırmalar. Vet Bil Derg, 21: 85-94.
• McKibben JS, Harrison GJ. 1986. Clinical anatomy with emphasis on the amazon parrot. clinical avian medicine and surgery, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, USA.
• McLelland J. 1990. A Colour atlas of avian anatomy. Wolfe Publishing Ltd, Aylesbury, UK.
• Mussa MT, Kamal MM, Mahmud MAA, Sarker BK, Jalil MA, Das SK. 2015. Evaluation of a rapid and efficient method for preparation of skeletons of rabbit and goose. Bangladesh J Vet Med, 13: 27-31. DOI: 10.3329/bjvm.v13i2.26617.
• Nomina Anatomica Avium (N.A.A.) 1993. International committe on avian anatomical nomenclature: Nomina anatomica avium , 2nd ed., World Association of Veterinary Anatomist, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
• Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E. 1977. Anatomy of the domestic birds. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany.
• Onuk B. 2008. Kazda (Anser anser domesticus) solunum sisteminin anatomisi. OMÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, PhD. Thesis, Samsun, Turkey.
• Özgel Ö, Düzler A, Ümran Bozkurt E. 2002. Macroanatomical investigations on ossa cinguli membri thoracici in bald ibis. Indian Vet J, 79: 700-707.
• Rezk HM. 2015. Anatomical investigation on the appendicular skeleton of the cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis). J Exp Clin Anat, 14:5-12. DOI: 10.4103/1596-2393.158919.
• Taşbaş M, Tecirlioğlu S. 1965. Maserasyon tekniği üzerinde araştırmalar. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 12: 324-330.
• Tilki M, Saatçi M. 2013. Her yönüyle kaz yetiştiriciliği. 1. Baskı, Salmat Basım Yayıncılık, Ankara, Turkey.
• Von Den Driesch A. 1976. A Guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin I. Cambridge M.A. Harvard University, USA.
• Yaman M. 1997. Bıldırcınların, Coturnix coturnix Linnaeus, 1758 (Aves: Gall.) Evcil ve yabani alt türlerinde kanat iskeletini oluşturan humerus, radius, ulna ve manus kemiklerinin biyometrik ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması. SÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Master Thesis, Konya, Turkeu
• Yıldız H, Yıldız B, Eren G. 1998. Tavuk, yerli ördek, güvercin ve bıldırcınlarda humerus ile antebrachium kemikleri üzerine morfometrik araştırma. UÜ Vet Fak Derg, 17: 87-91.
• Zeffer A, Lindhe Norberg UM. 2003. Leg morphology and locomotion in birds: Requirements for force and speed during ankle flexion. J Exp Biol, 206: 1085-1097. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00208.