Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 219 - 225, 01.05.2022

Aysun Özlü

https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1032380

Cited By: 16

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation plays important role in patients with lung diseases, and it is applied in acute, subacute, and chronic stages of the disease. Bibliometrics, which refers to the application of quantitative and statistical methods to analyze scientific publications on a specific topic, authors, journals, citation scores, and countries. Web of Science (WOS) search engine the selected keywords were those related to “pulmonary’’ and “rehabilitation” was used. Using the search query and 3,582 different types of results were gained and they were analyzed according to document types and after 20,645 entries, the number of journal articles was 1,493. Retrieved data were analyzed to present various bibliometric indicators while maps were visualized using the WOS viewer technique. The Hirsch (h) index and the impact factor (IF) of the publishing journal were used. Bibliometric overview of the literature on “pulmonary” and” rehabilitation” between 1970 – 2021 was given. The publications gained momentum after 2013. Most publications belong to 2020. In terms of the type of publications, meeting constitutes 80% of the publications published as abstracts and articles. About half of the published research articles are about the respiratory system and 11% of them are related to rehabilitation. The most frequent country was USA with 19.9 % of articles and England is the second most frequent country. In terms of the most cited country, the USA ranks first with 8238 citations. England is in second place with 5940 citations. Publications on “pulmonary” and “rehabilitation” have been increasing and growing rapidly in the past decade. The results can be used as context for analyzing broadscale strengths and gaps in the current state of evidence in a field and for informing a comprehensive strategic plan for further advancing the field and more countries should be encouraged to participate in the studies on this subject.

Keywords

Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Bibliometrics, Analysis, Scopus Database, Publication

Project Number

Yoktur

References

• Akmal M, Hasnain N, Rehan A, Iqbal U, Hashmi S, Fatima K, et al. 2020. Glioblastome Multiforme: A Bibliometric Analysis. World Neurosurg,136:270-282.
• Chai KH, Xiao X. 2012. Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, 33(1):24-43.
• Cooper ID. 2015. Bibliometrics basics. J Med Libr Assoc,103(4):217–218.
• Croitoru A, Bogdan MA. 2014. Evidenţe legate de reabilitarea pulmonară în patologia respiratorie [Evidences related to pulmonary rehabilitation in the respiratory pathology]. Pneumologia, 63(2):88-90.
• Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M. 2001. WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. Int J Integr Care,1:21.
• He B, Zhang P, Cai Q, Shi S, Xie H, Zhang Y et al. 2020. The top 100 most cited articles on bronchoscopy: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Pulm Med,27;20(1):229.
• Holland AE, Wadell K, Spruit MA. 2013. How to adapt the pulmonary rehabilitation programme to patients with chronic respiratory disease other than COPD. Eur Respir Rev,22(130):577-86.
• Hong SJ, Lim KJ, Hwang HJ, Baek S, Seo YL, Yun EJ, Yun JY, Choi CS, Yoon DY. 2017. The 100 Top-Cited Articles in Pulmonary Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis. J Thorac Imaging, 32(3):198-202.
• Küçük U, Alkan S, Uyar C. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of infective endocarditis. Iberoam J Med,3(4):350-355.
• Nici L, Zu Wallack RL. 2014. Pulmonary rehabilitation definition, concept, and history. Clin Chest Med,35:279-82.
• Özlü C. 2021. Bibliometric Evaluation Based On Scopus Database: A Global Analysıs of Publications on Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Evaluation of Publications From Turkey. Biotech Strateg Health Res,5(2):125-31.
• Pesut D, Ciobanu L, Nagorni-Obradovic L. 2008. Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory diseases--from goals to outcomes. Pneumologia,57(2):65-9.
• Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Ibarra-Contreras R, Rios C. 2019. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigen factor score, Cite Score, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci, 188(3):939–951.
• Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, et al. 2014. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,15;188(8):13-64.
• Thompson DF, Walker CK. 2015. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy,35(6):551–559.
• Wang TJ, Chau B, Lui M, Lam GT, Lin N, Humbert S. 2020. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COVID-19. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,99(9):769-774.
• Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Z. 2020. Recommendations for respiratory rehabilitation of coronavirus disease 2019 in adult. 12;43(4):308-314.