Research Article

The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections

Number: 9 January 27, 2026
EN TR

The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections

Abstract

By examining both short-term price reactions and long-term dynamic interactions, this study investigates how the U.S. presidential elections affect international financial markets. Using the MSCI Developed Markets (DM) and MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) indexes, the research focuses on the elections won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Donald Trump in 2024. The TVP-VAR framework is used to examine long-term dynamics, whereas an event study technique is used to investigate short-term consequences. The results of the event study show that short-term market reactions mostly stay within their confidence bands and that average abnormal returns around the election announcement and inauguration dates do not show a clear directional change. On the other hand, cumulative abnormal returns show that while DM markets performed better during the 2024 election era, EM markets outperformed DM markets during the 2020 election period. While there is no significant divergence in average abnormal returns between EM and DM markets, the divergence in cumulative abnormal returns suggests, contrary to a paradox, that markets have priced in election uncertainty and policy expectations cumulatively over time, rather than reacting on election day. According to the TVP-VAR results, the two markets are strongly interconnected and shock transmission primarily moves from DM to EM, with brief fluctuations noted during election seasons. Overall, the findings show that the effect of U.S. presidential elections on international financial markets differs depending on the political stance of the elected leader; the Trump administration tends to favor developed markets, while the Biden administration offers a more favorable pricing environment for emerging markets.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because of there was no study on animals or humans.

References

  1. Albori, M., Nispi Landi, V., & Moro, A. (2024). US election risks and the impact of Trump's re-election odds on financial markets. Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4910415
  2. Antonakakis, N., & Gabauer, D. (2017). Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on TVP-VAR. MPRA Paper 78282, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2013). Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty. Economics Letters, 120(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.004
  4. Beirne, J., Caporale, G. M., Schulze‐Ghattas, M., & Spagnolo, N. (2013). Volatility spillovers and contagion from mature to emerging stock markets. Review of International Economics, 21(5), 1060-1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12091
  5. Bialkowski, J., K. Gottschalk, & T. P. Wisniewski (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1941–1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.021
  6. Bilson, C. M., Brailsford, T. J., & Hooper, V. C. (2002). The explanatory power of political risk in emerging markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 11(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-5219(01)00067-9
  7. Bouoiyour, J., & Selmi, R. (2016). The price of political uncertainty: Evidence from the 2016 US presidential election and the US stock markets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06200. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.06200
  8. Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Economic Geography

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 27, 2026

Submission Date

December 10, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 30, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 9

APA
Şahin, E. (2026). The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections. Black Sea Journal of Public and Social Science, 9, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887
AMA
1.Şahin E. The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections. BSJ Pub. Soc. Sci. 2026;(9):32-46. doi:10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887
Chicago
Şahin, Emrah. 2026. “The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections”. Black Sea Journal of Public and Social Science, nos. 9: 32-46. https://doi.org/10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887.
EndNote
Şahin E (January 1, 2026) The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections. Black Sea Journal of Public and Social Science 9 32–46.
IEEE
[1]E. Şahin, “The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections”, BSJ Pub. Soc. Sci., no. 9, pp. 32–46, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887.
ISNAD
Şahin, Emrah. “The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections”. Black Sea Journal of Public and Social Science. 9 (January 1, 2026): 32-46. https://doi.org/10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887.
JAMA
1.Şahin E. The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections. BSJ Pub. Soc. Sci. 2026;:32–46.
MLA
Şahin, Emrah. “The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections”. Black Sea Journal of Public and Social Science, no. 9, Jan. 2026, pp. 32-46, doi:10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887.
Vancouver
1.Emrah Şahin. The Impact of US Presidential Elections on Global Market Dynamics: An Analysis of the 2020–2024 Elections. BSJ Pub. Soc. Sci. 2026 Jan. 1;(9):32-46. doi:10.52704/bssocialscience.1839887

                              22964