Yemeği Cinsiyetlendirmek: Yemekte ve Mutfakta Dişilik ve Erillik

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 119 - 130, 31.12.2024

Nazlı Terzi , Hayati Beşirli

https://doi.org/10.48174/buaad.1537841

Abstract

Yemek, insanların hayatlarını sürdürebilmesi için en temel ihtiyaçlardan birisidir. Bireylerin yiyecek tercihleri ise ekonomik ve kültürel faktörlerin yanı sıra cinsiyet faktörüne göre de değişmektedir. Literatür değerlendirmesi şeklinde gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada toplumsal cinsiyetin; kadınlığın ve erkekliğin, yemeği nasıl anlamlandırdığı ve yediklerimize atfettiğimiz anlamlar aracılığıyla yemeklerin de cinsiyetinin oluştuğu ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır. Toplumsal ve kültürel olarak inşa edilen cinsiyet algısına göre yemekte de erkek ve kadın kimliğinin şekillendiği görülmüştür. Toplum nezdinde kadınlar, nazik ve zayıf; erkekler, güçlü ve cesur olarak algılanmaktadır. Bu algı kapsamında et ve et ürünü yemekler güç ve erkeklikle ilişkilendirilerek çoğunlukla erkeklerin tükettiği ve tüketmesi gereken besinler olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Sebze, meyve gibi düşük kalorili besinler ve tatlılar ise kadınsı olarak görülmekte ve kadınların tercih ettiği besinler olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Erkek ve kadın kimliğine yüklenen anlamlar neticesinde cinsiyetlerin yiyecek tercihlerinin değiştiği, bu anlamlar çerçevesinde erkekler ve kadınlar arasında beslenme çeşidinin farklılaştığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

kimlik, yemek, kadınlık, erkeklik, toplumsal cinsiyet

Genderising Food: Femininity and Masculinity in Food and the Cuisine

Abstract

Food is one of the most basic needs for people to sustain their lives. Individuals' food preferences vary according to gender as well as economic and cultural factors. It is seen that the meanings we attribute to food also change according to gender. From this point of view, this article seeks to answer the question “how is the gender of food formed within the framework of femininity and masculinity?”. This study, which is conducted as a literature review, aims to reveal how gender, femininity and masculinity make sense of food and how the gender of food is formed through the meanings we attribute to what we eat. For this purpose, the study explains how meat and meat dishes, vegetable and vegetable dishes, fruits and desserts are gendered according to gender perception within the framework of female and male identity by including the concept of identity.
Identity is socially constructed and gender identities are within this scope. Masculinity and femininity are the result of certain behaviour patterns in society. Both the differences arising from the biological nature of human beings and social construction can be decisive here. This determination of gender has been demonstrated itself in many intersections. The differentiation of food preferences according to gender and the gender of food as an indicator are within this scope. It is seen that meat and meat products are attributed to masculinity and men, while foods such as vegetables, fruits and desserts are feminine and attributed to women. This differentiation is based on social institutions, language and status differentiation. The perception of gender has spread to discourses and spaces and turned into a situation that the person has internalised without realising it and has continued its existence from the past to the present.
Power and power relations appear as a fundamental phenomenon in determining the gender of food and represent status. In this context, it has been observed that the element of power varied according to the identity of men and women, and power was associated with men and masculinity. In this context, meat is considered as an essential of male power. Meals consisting of meat and meat products are seen to symbolise concepts such as physical endurance and courage and are considered as necessary foods for men by being described as ‘heavy’ food. Men are perceived as strong and brave, and within the scope of this perception, meat and meat product dishes are associated with power and masculinity and are considered as foods that men consume and should consume. Women are perceived as gentle and weak by society. Therefore, low-calorie and ‘light’ meals are associated with women, who are socially perceived to be weaker than men. Vegetable-based foods are seen as foods that do not produce power or produce less power compared to meat, which should be consumed by women. These socially constructed gender perceptions play a role in shaping men's and women's food preferences, also, men and women consume more of certain foods according to gender perceptions.
In conclusion, this study finds out that the food preferences of the genders change as a result of the meanings attributed to male and female identity and that the type of nutrition differs between men and women within the framework of these meanings. In addition, this study also shows that the methods of consumption of food also determine the male or female characters of food. Foods that are eaten by hand and broken with teeth are considered as masculine. These foods are the ones that can be consumed in large pieces. On the other hand, foods that are cut into small pieces are feminine. The seductive feature attributed to sweets is another dimension of their femininity.

Keywords

identity, food, femininity, masculinity, gender

References

• Adams, C. J. (2022). Etin Cinsel Politikası: Feminist-Vejetaryen Eleştirel Kuram. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Akçay, Y., & Vatansever, Ö. (2013). Kırmızı et tüketimi üzerine bir araştırma: Kocaeli ili kentsel alan örneği. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 43-60.
• Barr, S. I., & Chapman, G. E. (2002). Perceptions and practices of self-defined current vegetarian, former vegetarian, and nonvegetarian women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(3), 354-360.
• Barthes, R. (2013). Towards a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption. C. Counihan & P. van Esterik (Eds.), Food and Culture (23-30). Routledge.
• Beardsworth, A. D., & Keil, E. T. (1991). Vegetarianism, veganism, and meat avoidance: recent trends and findings. British Food Journal, 93(4), 19-24.
• Bentley, A. L. (2004). The other Atkins revolution: Atkins and the shifting culture of dieting. Gastronomica, 4, 34-45.
• Berger, M., & Wallis, B., & Watson, S. (1995). Introduction. M. Berger & B. Wallis & S. Watson (Eds.), Constructing Masculinity (1-7). Routledge.
• Beşirli, H. (2021). Yemek Sosyolojisi: Yiyeceklere ve Mutfağa Sosyolojik Bakış. Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
• Bilgin, N. (2007). Kimlik İnşası. Ankara: Aşina Kitaplar.
• Bourdieu, P. (2015). Ayrım: Beğeni yargısının toplumsal eleştirisi. Heretik Yayınları.
• Clarys, P., Deliens, T., Huybrechts, I., Deriemaeker, P., Vanaelst, B., De Keyzer, W., Hebbelinck, M., & Mullie, P. (2014). Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diet. Nutrients, 6(3), 1318-1332.
• Counihan, C. M. (2005). Introduction—Food and Gender: Identity and Power. C. M. Counihan & S. L. Kaplan (Eds.), Food and Gender: Identity and Power (1-11). Harwood Academic Publishers.
• Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Behavioral factors associated with disease, injury, and death among men: evidence and implications for prevention. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(1), 81-142. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.0901.81
• Gough, B., & Conner, M. T. (2006). Barriers to healthy eating amongst men: a qualitative analysis. Social science & medicine, 62(2), 387-395.
• Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
• Fiddes, N. (2004). Meat: A natural symbol. Routledge.
• Fox, R. (1986). The conditions of sexual evolution. P. Aries & A. Beijin (Eds.), Western Sexuality Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times (1-13). Basil Blackwell.
• Hart, D. (2018). Faux-meat and masculinity: the gendering of food on three vegan blogs. Canadian Food Studies/La Revue canadienne des études sur l'alimentation, 5(1), 133-155.
• Jensen, K. O., & Holm, L. (1999). Preferences, quantities and concerns: socio-cultural perspectives on the gendered consumption of foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53, 351-359.
• Julier, A. P., & Lindenfeld, L. (2005). Mapping men onto the menu: masculinities and food. Food and Foodways, 13, 1-16.
• Kerr, M., & Charles, N. (1986). Servers and providers: the distribution of food within the family, The Sociological Review, 34(1), 115-157.
• Leitzmann, C. (2014). Vegetarian nutrition: past, present, future. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 100(suppl_1), 496S-502S.
• Loo, T. (2001) Of moose and men: hunting for masculinities in British Columbia, 1880–1939. Western Historical Quarterly, 32 (3), 296–319, https://doi.org/10.2307/3650737
• Loveday, L., & Chiba, S. (1985). Partaking with the divine and symbolizing the societal: the semiotics of Japanese food and drink. Semiotica, 56(1-2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1985.56.1-2.115
• Lupton, D. (1996). Food, the Body and the Self. Sage Publications.
• McPhail, D., & Beagan, B., & Chapman, G. E. (2012). “I Don't Want to be Sexist But…”: Denying and re-inscribing gender through food. Food, Culture & Society, 15(3), 473-489.
• Mycek, M. K. (2018). Meatless meals and masculinity: How veg* men explain their plant-based diets. Food and Foodways, 26(3), 223-245.
• Nath, J. (2011). Gendered fare? A qualitative investigation of alternative food and masculinities. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 261-278.
• Nilsen, A. P. (1995). From Aunt Chilada's to Cactus Willy's: gender naming in the marketing of food in Arizona. Names, 43(1), 29-52.
• Rothgerber, H. (2013). Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4), 363-375.
• Sevindik, A. (2017). Türk Halk Kültüründe Yemek ve Cinsiyet İlişkisi. Uluslararası Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(13), 11-20.
• Sobal, J. (2005). Men, meat, and marriage: models of masculinity. Food and foodways, 13(1-2), 135-158.
• Stibbe, A. (2004). Health and the Social Construction of Masculinity in Men's Health Magazine. Men and Masculinities, 7(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257441
• Thomas, M. A. (2016). Are vegans the same as vegetarians? The effect of diet on perceptions of masculinity. Appetite, 97, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.021
• Twigg, J. (1984). Vegetarianism and the meanings of meat. A. Murcott (Ed.), The Sociology of Food and Eating: Essays on the Sociological Significance of Food (18-30). Gower Publishing.
• White, R., & Frank, E. (1994). Health effects and prevalence of vegetarianism. Western Journal of Medicine, 160(5), 465-470.