Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

How Global is Globalization?

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 02.09.2015

Abstract

This paper outlines the paradoxes in the rather fragmented process of globalization and the contradiction
between the inclusiveness of the concept and its exclusive processes and practices aligned with the global
power structure. One major assertion related to education is that we put more effort into screening vast
majorities out of education and we intentionally limit the participation of certain individuals and groups
from benefiting from the present state of epistemology and axiology. The paper concludes that for universal
inclusion, we need a totally new frame that merits the name „global‟and allows the contribution of cherishing
the contribution of each and every human being.

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (2006). The forms of capital. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (105-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, A. (2006). Education, globalisation and the nation state. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (192-197). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Robertson, S. L, Bonal. X. & Dale, R. (2006). GATS and the education service industry: the politics of scale and global reterritorialization. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (228-246). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

How Global is Globalization?

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 02.09.2015

Abstract

This paper outlines the paradoxes in the rather fragmented process of globalization and the contradiction between the inclusiveness of the concept and its exclusive processes and practices aligned with the global power structure. One major assertion related to education is that we put more effort into screening vast majorities out of education and we intentionally limit the participation of certain individuals and groups from benefiting from the present state of epistemology and axiology. The paper concludes that for universal inclusion, we need a totally new frame that merits the name „global‟and allows the contribution of cherishing the contribution of each and every human being.

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (2006). The forms of capital. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (105-118). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Green, A. (2006). Education, globalisation and the nation state. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (192-197). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Robertson, S. L, Bonal. X. & Dale, R. (2006). GATS and the education service industry: the politics of scale and global reterritorialization. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.A. Dillabough & A.H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, Globalisation & Social Change (228-246). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
There are 3 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Güzver Yıldıran This is me

Publication Date September 2, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 25 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yıldıran, G. (2015). How Global is Globalization?. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 25(1), 1-8.