Research Article

HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?

Volume: 15 Number: 1 June 30, 2022
TR EN

HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?

Abstract

This research examines how the determinants of environmental degradation -including (combustible and non-combustible) alternative energy consumption and remittance inflows- impact Egypt’s ecological footprint for the 1977-2014 period. After confirming the co-integration among the selected variables, the short-run and the long-run coefficients are estimated by the autoregressive distributed lag method. The long-term findings indicate that the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis is not accepted for Egypt, as income has a U-shape impact on ecological footprint. Moreover, fossil-fuel consumption and financial development worsen ecological footprint in the long-run. In addition, while non-combustible alternative energy utilization does not significantly impact ecological footprint in Egypt, combustible alternative energy usage and trade globalization decrease it in the long-run. The results further reveal that remittance inflows to Egypt increase ecological footprint in both the short-run and the long-run. Pursuant to the findings, some policy conclusions and suggestions are propounded.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdelhady, S., Borello, D., Shaban, A., & Rispoli, F. (2014). Viability Study of Biomass Power Plant Fired with Rice Straw in Egypt. Energy Procedia, 61, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1072
  2. Abdou, D. M. S., & Atya, E. M. (2013). Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Green Economics, 7(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2013.057436
  3. Abdouli, M., & Hammami, S. (2018). The Dynamic Links Between Environmental Quality, Foreign Direct Investment, and Economic Growth in the Middle Eastern and North African Countries (MENA Region). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(3), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0369-5
  4. Abdulrahman, A. O., & Huisingh, D. (2018). The role of biomass as a cleaner energy source in Egypt’s energy mix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3918–3930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.049
  5. Adams, R. H. (1991). The Economic Uses and Impact of International Remittances in Rural Egypt. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(4), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1086/451904
  6. Ahmad, M., Ul Haq, Z., Khan, Z., Khattak, S. I., Ur Rahman, Z., & Khan, S. (2019). Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2099–2121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642783
  7. Ahmed, A., Uddin, G. S., & Sohag, K. (2016). Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from selected European countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 90, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.004
  8. Al-Ayouty, I., Hassaballa, H., & Rizk, R. (2017). Clean manufacturing industries and environmental quality: The case of Egypt. Environmental Development, 21, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2016.11.005

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

January 19, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 28, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 15 Number: 1

APA
Karasoy, A. (2022). HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT? Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1060051
AMA
1.Karasoy A. HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT? BUJSS. 2022;15(1):8-28. doi:10.18221/bujss.1060051
Chicago
Karasoy, Alper. 2022. “HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?”. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 15 (1): 8-28. https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1060051.
EndNote
Karasoy A (June 1, 2022) HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT? Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 15 1 8–28.
IEEE
[1]A. Karasoy, “HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?”, BUJSS, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 8–28, June 2022, doi: 10.18221/bujss.1060051.
ISNAD
Karasoy, Alper. “HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?”. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 15/1 (June 1, 2022): 8-28. https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1060051.
JAMA
1.Karasoy A. HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT? BUJSS. 2022;15:8–28.
MLA
Karasoy, Alper. “HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT?”. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, June 2022, pp. 8-28, doi:10.18221/bujss.1060051.
Vancouver
1.Alper Karasoy. HOW DO CONSUMING ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES AND REMITTANCE INFLOWS IMPACT EGYPT’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT? BUJSS. 2022 Jun. 1;15(1):8-28. doi:10.18221/bujss.1060051

Cited By