Research Article

Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19

Volume: 2 Number: 3 September 25, 2024
EN

Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI) and the COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (CGCIRS) in identifying critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Methods: Patients over 18 years of age with a positive PCR test who presented to the Emergency Department of Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital between 15.03.2020 and 15.03.2021 with COVID-19 findings were retrospectively included in the study. Mortality, qCSI (respiratory rate per minute, oxygen saturation, oxygen demand per minute), and CGCIRS (x-ray abnormality, age, hemoptysis, dyspnea, impaired consciousness, comorbid disease, presence of cancer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value, direct bilirubin value) were investigated within 1, 7 and 28 days. Results: A total of 1499 patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR test were included in the study. Invasive mechanical ventilation was performed in 44 (2.9%) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in 63 (4.2%) patients. 57 (3.8%) patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Mortality occurred in the first 24 hours in 1 (0.1%) and 28 days in 41 (2.7%) patients. Having comorbidities, use of 10 lt/min oxygen, use of high flow oxygen, need for non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation, and need for ICU were found to increase 28-day mortality significantly. The qCSI and CGCIRS were found to be significantly different in patients who developed 28-day mortality with qCSI and CGCIRS, respectively (p<0.001), (p<0.001). In the ROC analysis for 28-day mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) value of qCSI was 0.966 [(95% CI: 0.934-0.998), (p<0.001)] and the AUC value of CGCIRS was 0.971 [(95% CI: 0.959-0.983), (p<0.001)]. qCSI had a sensitivity of 97.6% and specificity of 84% with a cut-off value of 4.5 for 28-day mortality; CGCIRS had a sensitivity of 95.1% and specificity of 91.2% with a cut-off value of 116.5 for 28-day mortality. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that both qCSI and CGCIRS have significant predictive capabilities in identifying critical Covid-19 patients over a 28-day period. These scores are valuable for early identification and appropriate management of critically ill patients in the emergency department.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Statement

The study was conducted with the protocol numbered 2011-KAEK-25 2021/02-07 approved by the Bursa High Specialization Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

References

  1. Vabret N, Britton GJ, Gruber C, Hegde S, Kim J, Kuksin M, Levantovsky R, Malle L, Moreira A, Park MD, Pia L, Risson E, Saffern M, Salomé B, Esai Selvan M, Spindler MP, Tan J, van der Heide V, Gregory JK, Alexandropoulos K, Bhardwaj N, Brown BD, Greenbaum B, Gümüş ZH, Homann D, Horowitz A, Kamphorst AO, Curotto de Lafaille MA, Mehandru S, Merad M, Samstein RM; Sinai Immunology Review Project. Immunology of COVID-19: Current State of the Science. Immunity. 2020 Jun 16;52(6):910-941. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002.
  2. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Mar;55(3):105924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924.
  3. Khari S, Abadi ASA, Pazokian M, Yousefifard M. CURB-65, qSOFA, and SIRS Criteria in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients; a Prognostic Accuracy Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med 2022;10(1): e36. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1565
  4. Haimovich AD, Ravindra NG, Stoytchev S, Young HP, Wilson FP, van Dijk D, Schulz WL, Taylor RA. Development and Validation of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index: A Prognostic Tool for Early Clinical Decompensation. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):442-453. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.022.
  5. Mission RotW-CJ, (COVID-19) oCD. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): 2020 Report. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19- final-report.pdf.
  6. Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, Chen B, Chen A, Li C, Li Y, Guan W, Sang L, Lu J, Xu Y, Chen G, Guo H, Guo J, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Li S, Zhang N, Zhong N, He J; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033.
  7. Abate BB, Kassie AM, Kassaw MW, Aragie TG, Masresha SA. Sex difference in coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):e040129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040129.
  8. Fang X, Li S, Yu H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Li Y, Cheng L, Li W, Jia H, Ma X. Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jul 13;12(13):12493-12503. doi: 10.18632/aging.103579.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Emergency Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 25, 2024

Submission Date

June 26, 2024

Acceptance Date

September 5, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Demir, B., Ay, M. O., İşler, Y., Kaya, H., & Yüksel, M. (2024). Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine, 2(3), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.61678/bursamed.1505472
AMA
1.Demir B, Ay MO, İşler Y, Kaya H, Yüksel M. Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19. J Bursa Med. 2024;2(3):85-92. doi:10.61678/bursamed.1505472
Chicago
Demir, Büşra, Mehmet Oğuzhan Ay, Yeşim İşler, Halil Kaya, and Melih Yüksel. 2024. “Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index and the COVID-19 Gram Critical Illness Risk Score in Identifying Critical Patients With COVID-19”. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine 2 (3): 85-92. https://doi.org/10.61678/bursamed.1505472.
EndNote
Demir B, Ay MO, İşler Y, Kaya H, Yüksel M (September 1, 2024) Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine 2 3 85–92.
IEEE
[1]B. Demir, M. O. Ay, Y. İşler, H. Kaya, and M. Yüksel, “Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19”, J Bursa Med, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 85–92, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.61678/bursamed.1505472.
ISNAD
Demir, Büşra - Ay, Mehmet Oğuzhan - İşler, Yeşim - Kaya, Halil - Yüksel, Melih. “Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index and the COVID-19 Gram Critical Illness Risk Score in Identifying Critical Patients With COVID-19”. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine 2/3 (September 1, 2024): 85-92. https://doi.org/10.61678/bursamed.1505472.
JAMA
1.Demir B, Ay MO, İşler Y, Kaya H, Yüksel M. Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19. J Bursa Med. 2024;2:85–92.
MLA
Demir, Büşra, et al. “Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Quick COVID-19 Severity Index and the COVID-19 Gram Critical Illness Risk Score in Identifying Critical Patients With COVID-19”. Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine, vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 2024, pp. 85-92, doi:10.61678/bursamed.1505472.
Vancouver
1.Büşra Demir, Mehmet Oğuzhan Ay, Yeşim İşler, Halil Kaya, Melih Yüksel. Comparison of the effectiveness of the quick COVID-19 severity index and the COVID-19 gram critical illness risk score in identifying critical patients with COVID-19. J Bursa Med. 2024 Sep. 1;2(3):85-92. doi:10.61678/bursamed.1505472

Journal of Bursa Faculty of Medicine, hosted by Turkish JournalPark ACADEMIC, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

by-nc-nd.png
2025