Analysis of Isolation Precautions in a Tertiary Training and Research Hospital

Year 2023, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 45 - 49, 29.05.2023

Ali Asan Canan Demir Mustafa Özgür Akça Ali Gümüş Aysegul Ozdemir Kahriman Esra Cakir Gokcen

Abstract

Objectives: Isolation precautions are used to take control of pathogen transmission and reduce hospital-acquired infections. The aim of our research is to evaluate all patients for whom isolation is recommended, to determine isolation types, growing microorganisms and isolation compliance.
Methods: All patients isolated within a calendar year were analyzed based on infection control committee records. Of the isolation patients, 14.6% (201/1379) were in the pediatric infection clinic, 14.1% (194/1379) in the pediatric clinics, 11.2% (155/1379) in the general intensive care unit, 8.3% (115/1379) was followed in the urology clinic.
Results: In 2018; 83,750 patients were hospitalized and followed up in our hospital. Isolation was recommended for 1379 (1.6%) of the hospitalized patients. Of the isolation recommended patients, 14.6% (201/1379) were in the pediatric infection clinic, 14.1% (194/1379) in the pediatric clinics, 11.2% (155/1379) in the general intensive care unit, 8.3% (115/1379) was followed in the urology clinic.
Conclusion: Isolation precautions are very important in protecting both patients and healthcare workers from transmission of infections. It should be aimed to determine the isolation periods in accordance with the criteria determined in the international guidelines and discontinuing the isolation measures as soon as possible when the indication is terminated.

Keywords

Patient isolation, infection control, transmission

References

• Şardan YÇ. Hastane Enfeksiyonu Tanı Kriterleri. In: Doğanay M, Ünal S eds. Hastane İnfeksiyonları 2013. Ankara: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2013: pp 215-54.
• Töreci K, Şardan YÇ. Hastane Enfeksiyon Kontrolünün Tarihçesi: Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Durumu. In: Doğanay M, Ünal S eds. Hastane İnfeksiyonları 2013. Ankara: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2013: pp 1-20.
• Garner JS, the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 56-80.
• D. J. Morgan, D. J. Diekema, K. Sepkowitz, and E. N. Perencevich, “Adverse outcomes associated with contact precautions: a review of the literature,” American Journal of Infection Control 2009;37:85–93.
• Sprague E, Reynolds S, Brindley P. Patient Isolation Precautions: Are They Worth It? Can Respir J 2016;2016:5352625.
• Verlee K, Berriel-Cass D, Buck K, Nguyen C. Cost of isolation: daily cost of isolation determined and cost avoidance demonstrated from the overuse of personal protective equipment in an acute care facility. Am J Infect Control 2014;42(4):448-9.
• Tran K, Bell C, Stall N, Tomlinson G, McGeer A, Morris A, Gardam M, Abrams HB. The Effect of Hospital Isolation Precautions on Patient Outcomes and Cost of Care: A Multi-Site, Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32(3):262-8.
• H. R. Day, E. N. Perencevich, A. D. Harris et al., “Do contact precautions cause depression? A two-year study at a tertiary care medical centre,” Journal of Hospital Infection 2011;79(2):103-7.
• H. R. Day, E. N. Perencevich, A. D. Harris et al., “Association between contact precautions and delirium at a tertiary care center,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2012;33(1):34-9.
• Vuichard-Gysin D, Nueesch R, Fuerer RL, Dangel M, Widmer A. Measuring perception of mental well-being in patients under isolation precautions: a prospective comparative study. BMJ Open 2022;21(3):e044639.
• Seweryn M, Bandoła K, Bała M, Sroka S, Koperny M, Wszołek M. Alert microorganisms isolated from patients hospitalized in Małopolskie province in 2010-2012. Przegl Epidemiol 2014;68(3):443-50, 549-53.
• González-Estrada A, Fernández-Prada M, Martínez Ortega C et al. Compliance with contact isolation precautions of multidrug-resistant microorganisms in a tertiary hospital. Rev Calid Asist 2016;31(5):293-9.