AİT OLMA İHTİYACI ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE FORMUNUN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Ait Olma İhtiyacı Ölçeği’nin (AOİÖ) Türkçeye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin Türkiye örnekleminde incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla iki farklı çalışma yürütülmüştür. Birinci çalışmada ölçeğin faktör yapısı incelenerek geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Birinci çalışmanın örneklemini 453 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Ait Olma İhtiyacı Ölçeği’nin yakın bir kavram olan genel aidiyet ile teorik olarak ilişkili ancak konsept olarak farklı bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca ait olma ihtiyacının görmezden gelinme, kişiliğin duygusal tutarsızlık, uyumluluk boyutları ile pozitif yönde dışadönüklük ile ise negatif yönde anlamlı ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İkinci çalışmada ise ölçeğin birinci çalışmada elde edilen faktör yapısına ilişkin doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yürütülmüştür. İkinci çalışmanın örneklemi ise 347 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Ait Olma İhtiyacı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun ölçeğin orijinal çalışmasına benzer şekilde tek faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu ve psikometrik özelliklerinin yeterli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Her iki çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar Ait Olma İhtiyacı Ölçeği’nin psikometrik özelliklerinin Türkiye popülasyonu için kabul edilebilir olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Ait olma
• Aidiyet
• Kişilik
• Ölçek Uyarlama

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE TURKISH FORM OF THE NEED TO BELONG SCALE

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Need to Belong Scale (NBS) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties in a Turkish population. For this purpose, two separate studies were conducted. In the first study, involving 453 university students, the factor structure of the scale was examined, and its validity and reliability were assessed. The Need to Belong Scale was found to be theoretically related to general belongingness, a similar construct, yet conceptually distinct as a measurement tool. Furthermore, it was discovered that the need to belong was significantly and positively associated with being ignored, neuroticism, and agreeableness, while it was negatively related to extraversion. In the second study, which included 347 university students, confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factor structure identified in the first study. Results indicated that the Turkish version of the Need to Belong Scale retained the single-factor structure of the original scale and demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The findings from both studies indicated that the Need to Belong Scale's psychometric properties were appropriate for the Turkish population.

Keywords

• Need to belong
• Belongingness
• Personality
• Scale development

References

1. Alabri, A. (2022). Fear of missing out (FOMO): The effects of the need to belong, perceived centrality, and fear of social exclusion. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022(1), 4824256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4824256.
2. Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: Human needs in organizational settings. Free Press. Allen, K. A. (2020). The psychology of belonging. Routledge.
3. Allen, K. A. ve Bowles, T. (2012). Belonging as a Guiding Principle in the Education of Adolescents. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 12, 108-119.
4. Allen, K. A., Kern, M. L., Rozek, C. S., McInerney, D. M. ve Slavich, G. M. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1883409.
5. Baumeister, R. ve Leary, M. (1995). The Need To Belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
6. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (28. baskı). Pegem Akademi.

9. Cacioppo, J. T. ve Cacioppo, S. (2014). Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and personality psychology compass, 8(2), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12087.
10. Cheek, J. M. ve Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330.
11. Cohen, S. ve Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.
12. De Cremer, D. ve Leonardelli, G. J. (2003). Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(2), 168-174
13. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
14. Demir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeği'nin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(23), 14-18.
15. Duru, E. (2015). Genel aidiyet ölçeğinin psikometrik özellikleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(44), 37-47.
16. Eaton, L. G. ve Funder, D. C. (2003). The creation and consequences of the social world: An interactional analysis of extraversion. European Journal of Personality, 17(5), 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.477.
17. Eisen, M., Ware Jr, J. E., Donald, C. A. ve Brook, R. H. (1979). Measuring components of children’s health status. Medical Care, 902-921.
18. Field, A. (2006). Research methods II: Reliability analysis. Sage Publications.
19. Gençöz, T. ve Öncül, Ö. (2012). Examination of personality characteristics in a Turkish sample: Development of basic personality traits inventory. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 194-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686932.
20. George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. (14th ed.). Routledge.
21. Gilman, R., Carter-Sowell, A., DeWall, C. N., Adams, R. E. ve Carboni, I. (2013). Validation of the ostracism experience scale for adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 319-330.
22. Göçener, D. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin güvenli bağlanma düzeyleri ile kişilerarası ilişki tarzları arasındaki ilişkiler. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
23. Halmatov, S. (2007). Türkiye’de eğitim görmekte olan yabancı uyruklu öğrenciler ile TC uyruklu öğrencilerin psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Selçuk Üniversitesi.
24. Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T. ve Bentley, S. (2019). Group life shapes the psychology and biology of health: The case for a sociopsychobio model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(8), e12490. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12490.
25. Hill, C. A. (1987). Affiliation motivation: people who need people… but in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 1008-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.1008.
26. Holt-Lunstad, J. (2022). Social connection as a public health issue: The evidence and a systemic framework for prioritizing the “social” in social determinants of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 43, 2.1–2.23.
27. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447.
28. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. ve Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3(2), 114-158.
29. Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347.
30. Kavaklı, M. (2018). Psikolojik dışlanma ile internet kullanma alışkanlıkları arasındaki ilişkide öz duyarlığın aracı rolü [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ufuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
31. Kavaklı, M. (2019). Psikolojik dışlanma ve sosyal dışlanma arasındaki farklılık: Benlik değeri, yalnızlık ve genel aidiyet duygusu üzerindeki etkileri. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(20), 45-55.
32. Kavaklı, M. ve Aydın, O. (2024). Algılanan psikolojik dışlanma ve sosyal dışlanma ile internet kullanma alışkanlıkları arasındaki ilişki: Öz duyarlığın rolü. Külliye, 5(2), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.48139/aybukulliye.1389292.
33. Kaya, C., Ataman, G. ve Aydin, B. Y. (2017). Workplace ostracism and work engagement: the moderating role of neuroticism. International Journal of Business & Management, 5(2), 17-28.
34. Kelly, K. M. (2001). Individual differences in reactions to rejection. M. R. Leary (Ed.), Kişilerarası reddedilme içinde (ss. 291–315). Oxford University Press.
35. Kılıç, A. F. ve Uysal, İ. (2021). Faktör çıkarma yöntemlerinin paralel analiz sonuçlarına etkisi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 11(2), 926-942. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.747075.
36. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M. ve Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919.
37. Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A. ve Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(6), 610-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.819511.
38. Liu, S., Xiao, W., Fang, C., Zhang, X. ve Lin, J. (2020). Social support, belongingness, and value co-creation behaviors in online health communities. Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101398.
39. Luchetti, M., Terracciano, A., Aschwanden, D., Lee, J. H., Stephan, Y. ve Sutin, A. R. (2020). Loneliness is associated with risk of cognitive impairment in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 35(7), 794-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5304.
40. Mahamid, F., Veronese, G. ve Bdier, D. (2024). Trauma predicts the desire to migrate and psychological well-being via belongingness and quality of life among Palestinians. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001647.
41. Malone, G. P., Pillow, D. R. ve Osman, A. (2012). The general belongingness scale (GBS): Assessing achieved belongingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.027 Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50(4), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.
42. Mazinani, Z., Shakiba, S., Pourshahbaz, A. ve Vahedi, M. (2021). Five Factor Narcissism and threat to fundamental needs following social exclusion engendered by the Cyberball game. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110279.
43. McCrae, R. R. ve Allik, I. (Eds.). (2002). The five-factor model of personality across cultures. Springer Science & Business Media.
44. McHorney, C. A., Ware Jr, J. E., Lu, J. R. ve Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40-66.
45. Mellor, D., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Hayashi, Y. ve Cummins, R. (2008). Need for belonging, relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.020.
46. Mercan, Ç. S. (2016). Ergenler için sosyal dişlanma ölçeği: Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği. HAYEF Journal of Education, 13(2), 175-186.
47. Nigar, F. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencileri ile yatılı bölge ortaokul öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluş ve temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar düzeyinin karşılaştırması [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi.
48. Oyanedel, J. C. ve Paez, D. (2021). Social belongingness and well-being: International perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 735507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735507.
49. Perlman, D. (2004). European and Canadian studies of loneliness among seniors. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 23(2), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2004.0025.
50. Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L. ve Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1095-1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262085.
51. Roberts, B. W. ve Yoon, H. J. (2022). Personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 489-516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927.
52. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. ve Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472-480.
53. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. ve Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11.
54. Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (2010). Library of congress cataloging-in-publication data. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). NY: Routledge.
55. Seehusen, J., Cordaro, F., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Routledge, C., Blackhart, G. C., ... ve Vingerhoets, A. J. (2013). Individual differences in nostalgia proneness: The integrating role of the need to belong. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(8), 904-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.020.
56. Shifron, R. (2010). Adler's Need to Belong as the Key for Mental Health. Journal of Individual Psychology, 66(1). Slaten, C. D., Ferguson, J. K., Allen, K. A., Brodrick, D. V. ve Waters, L. (2016). School belonging: A review of the history, current trends, and future directions. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2016.6
57. Unanue, J., Oriol, X., Oyanedel, J. C., Unanue, W. ve Gómez, M. (2022). Basic psychological needs satisfaction and frustration prospectively mediates the link between dispositional gratitude and life satisfaction: Longitudinal evidence from a representative sample in Chile. Personality and Individual Differences, 193, 111608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111608.
58. Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A. ve Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9257-4.
59. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M. ve Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
60. Vo, T. T. D., Tuliao, K. V. ve Chen, C. W. (2022). Work motivation: The roles of individual needs and social conditions. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020049.
61. Wang, J., Mann, F., Lloyd-Evans, B., Ma, R. ve Johnson, S. (2018). Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5.
62. Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
63. Williams, K. D. 2009. Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. M. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology içinde (ss. 275-314). Academic Press.
64. Wilmot, M. P. ve Ones, D. S. (2022). Agreeableness and its consequences: A quantitative review of meta-analytic findings. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(3), 242-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211073007.
65. Zhang, X. ve Dai, L. (2015). The relationship between neuroticism and experience of workplace ostracism in new employees. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.32011.
66. Zhou, Z., Zhang, S., Kim, Y. K., Birditt, K. S. ve Fingerman, K. L. (2024). Need to belong, daily social engagement, and transient loneliness in late life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231211617