MERSİN’İN EKONOMİDEKİ ROLÜ VE POTANSİYELİ

Abstract

Mersin’in ekonomideki rolü ve potansiyelini belirleyebilmemiz için öncelikle Mersin gibi orta ölçekli şehirler ile büyük şehirlerin arasındaki temel farklılıklara bakmamız gerekmektedir. Büyük şehirlerle ilgili farklılıkları belirleme, orta ölçekli şehir karakteristiklerinin tespitine yardımcı olacaktır. İş yapma şekilleri de şehir karakteristiklerinden etkilenebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada da Mersin’in ekonomik potansiyelini ortaya koyabilmek ve rekabet gücünü artırabilmek için global kriterler çerçevesinde mevcut durum ve potansiyeli analiz edilmektedir

Keywords

• yığınlaşma ekonomisi, orta ölçekli şehirler, karakteristikleri şehir

THE ROLE AND ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF MERSIN

Abstract

Before identifying the economic role and potential of Mersin, we have to determine the difference between the big and medium-sized cities. Identifying the difference related with big cities would help to determine the typology of mediumsized cities. The way of doing businesses may be effected by the medium-sized city characteristics. Besides, we need to analyze global criterions for the success of cities. In this study for the purpose of outline and improvement of the Mersin competitiveness within the global criterions, current situations and potentials are analyzed

Keywords

• Economies of agglomeration, medium-sized cities, city typologies

References

1. Christopherson, S. (2004), “Creative Economy Strategies For Small and Medium Sized Cities: Options for New York State”, Working Paper, ss. 1-21.
2. Erickcek, G.A. (2004), “Small Cities Blues: Looking for Growth Factors in Small and Medium-Sized Cities”, Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper, No. 04-100, 1-41.
3. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions-EFILWC. (2008), “Global Competition and European Companies’ Location Decisions”, Poznań, Poland, ss. 1-18.
4. Fujita, M. ve Mori, T. (2005), “Frontiers of the New Economic Geography”, Instute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper, No: 27, 1-35.
5. Glaeser, E L (2005) Four Challenges for Scotland’s Cities. Coyle, D, Alexander, W and Ashcroft, B (ed) New Wealth for Old Nations: Scotland’s Economic Prospects. New Jersey: Princeton University Press
6. Giffinger,R. ve diğerleri. (2006), “City-ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities”, Working Paper, ss. 1-12.
7. Henderson, J.V. ve diğerleri .(2000), Geography and Development”, Working Paper, ss. 1-35.
8. Hildreth, P. A. (2006), “Roles and Economic Potential of English Medium Sized Cities: A Discussion Paper”, Working Paper, ss. 1-46.

9. Krugman, P. (1998), “The Role of Geography in Development”, Working Paper, ss. 1-35.
10. Meyer, John R. (2000), “The Role of Industrial and Post-Industrial Cities in Economic Development”, Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University:W001, ss.1-30.
11. Ormerod, P. ve Diğerleri. (2006), “Why distance doesn’t die: Agglomeration and its benefits”, GLAECONOMICS Working Paper 17, ss.1-37.
12. Simmie, J. ve diğerleri. (2005), “Realising the Full Economic Potential of London and the Core Cities”, Working Paper, ss. 1-21.
13. Simmie, J. ve diğerleri. (2006), “State of the English Cities: The Competitive Economic Communities and Local Government, ss.1-251. of English Cities, Department for www.tuik.gov.tr www.hazine.gov.tr
14. www.turkpatent.gov.tr www.invest.gov.tr