Decolonization of policy process and not the policy of decolonization

Abstract

Colonialism and neo-colonialism as socioeconomic and political realities among the third world nations were designed to operate through the logic of socioeconomic thinking and activities of the indigenous people. Ignorance of this has made the colonized vulnerable to the complex and fluid networks of colonialism, and neo-colonialism programs as designed by the colonialists and neo-colonialists. Most of these nations have put forward policy of decolonization without thinking about decolonization of their domestic and international policy postures. By so doing, most of these nations have become more vulnerable to their former colonialists as well as the entrant neo-colonialists. Nigeria, as one of the nations operating in the raiders of their former colonial masters and the entrant neo-colonialists, has been subjected to perpetual dependency and failure due to the ignorance of the fluid structure and networks of neo-colonialism. The fact, as this paper specifically aims to prove, is that there is no way socioeconomic logical framework on the platform of imperialism paradigm will produce genuine and sustainable development. As such, the paper modelled the colonialists’ socioeconomic policy logical framework, neo-colonialists’ socioeconomic policy logical framework, and the decolonization of socioeconomic policy logical framework in Nigeria for sustainable development.

Keywords

• Colonialism,Neocolonialism,Socioeconomic logical framework,Policy of Decolonization,Decolonization of policy process

References

1. Adetoro, J.E. A primary history for Nigeria. London: Macmillan Education Ltd, 1965 p.25-43. Arukwe, Nnanna, O. Since Equiano: History and challenges of African socio-political thought. Nsukka: University of Nigeria press, 2010 p.185-196. Barker, A.J. The neglected war: Mesopotamia 1914-1918. United Kingdom: Faber & Faber, 1967 p.86. Canovan, M. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, vol. 47, 1999 p.2–16. Chinweizu The West and the rest of us. New York: Vintage books, 1975 p.35-85. Equiano, Olaudah. Equiano’s travel: His autobiography (Edited by Paul, E. Edwards). London: Heinemann Educational, 1798/1967 p.13. Hughs, M. Alleby and British strategy in Middle East 1917-1919. London: Frank Cass publishers, 1999 p.78. Jega A. M. Democracy, good governance and development in Nigeria. Spectrum Books, Ibadan, 2007 p.58 Laurijssen, I. & Spruyt, B. Not for people like us? A six-year panel study of the mutual relationship between feelings of relative deprivation and occupational status among young adults in Flanders. Social Indicators Research, vol.124, 2014 p.617–35. Nwanunobi, C. O. African Social Institutions. Nsukka: University of Nigeria press, 2001 p.194. Okafor Samuel, O. “Colonialism and neo-colonialism: The factors the degraded the concept of leadership among the Igbo” Igbo institutions and leadership edited by Nwaozuzu, Gabriella, I, Okpoko, Patrick, U, Mbah, Boniface, M & Ahamefula, Ndubuisi, O. University of Nigeria: Centre for Igbo studies, 2018 p.87. Okafor, Samuel, O. (2019). The Colonialists & Indigenous Exchange Currency: Tracing the Genesis of Socioeconomic Woes in Postcolonial Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy 8, (1), 37-50. DOI: 10.18488/journal.26.2019.81.37.50 Osman A. B. New World Order Neo-Colonialism: A Contextual Comparison of Contemporary China and European Colonization in Africa Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies, vol. 10 no2, 2017 p.177-196. Rodney, Walter. How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington D.C: Howard University press, 1972 p.161-169. Shokpeka S. A. & Nwaokocha O. A. British Colonial Economic Policy in Nigeria, the Example of Benin Province 1914 – 1954. J Hum Ecol, vol. 28 no1 2009 p. 57-66. Ziltener, P, Künzler, D. & Walter, A. Measuring the Impacts of Colonialism: A New Data Set for the Countries of Africa and Asia. Journal of World-Systems Research vol. 23 no1 2017 p.156-190