The Porcupine and the End of History

Year 2020, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 240 - 251, 29.12.2020

Baysar Tanıyan

https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.848919

Abstract

Set in a fictional East European country in the aftermath of the collapse of communism, Julian Barnes’s The Porcupine (1992) is a political satire where he juxtaposes two dominant ideologies; capitalist liberal democracy and communism. Although this short novel has a conventional narrative form, postmodern discussions on history can be observed, especially the discussion which has revolved around the idea of “the end of history”. It was Francis Fukuyama’s controversial article entitled “The End of History” (1989) that has sparked this specific debate. In 1992, he elaborated his thesis in a book titled The End of History and the Last Man, the same year Barnes published his novel. Fukuyama suggests that the modern Western liberal democracy is the ultimate and the most successful form of human government, the point where the Hegelian dialectic of history comes to an end. The aim of this article is to present a critical reading of the novel in the context of Fukuyama’s thesis and the discussion generated by this thesis. While it is true that Fukuyama’s thesis has now been outdated and negated, this reading may still provide fresh insights for the current political panorama of the world shaped by surging nationalism, increasing populism and growing conservatism.

Keywords

Julian Barnes, The Porcupine, history, Francis Fukuyama, end of history

References

• Barnes, Julian. “Candles for the Living”. London Review of Books, 6 Nov. 2019, www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v12/n22/julian-barnes/candles-for-the-living.
• Barnes, Julian. Conversations with Julian Barnes, edited by Vanessa Guignery and Ryan Roberts. University Press of Mississippi, 2009.
• Barnes, Julian. The Porcupine. Alfred A. Knopf, 1992.
• Barthes, Roland. “The Discourse of History,” Comparative Criticism, vol. 3, 1981, pp. 7-20.
• Bloom, Allan, et al. “Responses to Fukuyama,” The National Interest, no. 16, 1989, pp. 19-35.
• Buchwalter, Andrew. “Is Hegel’s Philosophy of History Eurocentric?” Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America, 19, Hegel and History, 2009, pp. 87-110.
• Buran Utku, Sumeyra. “hiSTORiographic Metafiction of the Past Time: A self-begetting novel To Whom It May Concern,” Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, vol. 22, Autumn 2018, pp. 377-389.
• Childs, Peter. Julian Barnes. Manchester University Press, 2011.
• Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. Trans. Peggy Kamuf, Routledge, 1994.
• Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge, 2002.
• Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?” The National Interest, no. 16, 1989, pp. 3-18.
• Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and The Last Man. Penguin Books, 1992.
• Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar Straus and Giroux, 2018.
• Guignery, Vanessa. “Untangling the Intertwined Threads of Fiction and Reality in The Porcupine (1992) by Julian Barnes.” Pre and Post-publication Itineraries of the Contemporary Novel in English, edited by Vanessa Guignery, Publibook, 2007. pp. 49-71.
• Hegel, Georg W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, vol. 1, Manuscripts of the Introduction and The Lectures of 1822-3, edited by Robert F. Brown and Peter C. Hodgson, Clarendon Press, 2011.
• Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. Routledge, 1995.
• Kondeva, Dimitrina. “The Story of Julian Barnes’s The Porcupine: an Epistolary ½ Chapter.” Julian Barnes: Contemporary Critical Perspectives, edited by Sebastian Groes and Peter Childs, Continuum Press, 2011, pp. 81-92.
• Lázaro, Alberto. “The Techniques of Committed Fiction: In Defence of Julian Barnes’s The Porcupine,” Atlantis, vol. 22, no. 1, 2000, pp. 121-131.
• Moseley, Merritt. Understanding Julian Barnes. University of South Carolina, 1997.
• White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. The John Hopkins University Press, 1990.