BibTex RIS Cite

What is the Ultimate Source of Normativity of a (New) Constitution? Replies From Legal Positivism

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 109 - 132, 01.04.2011

Ali Acar

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

  • Ackerman, Bruce A. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” The Yale Law Journal 93, no. 6 (1984): 1013-72.
  • Albert, Richard. “Nonconstitutional Amendments.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XXII, no. 1 (2009): 5-47.
  • Delacroix, Sylvie. “Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted.” Ratio Juris 17, no. 4 (2004): 501-20.
  • Dickson, Julie. “Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 3 (2007): 373-402.
  • Eekelaar, J. M. “The Principles of Revolutionary Legality.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 22-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
  • Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Precedent-Based Constitutional Adjudication, Acceptance, and the Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the Us Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 47-68. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Finnis, John M. “Revolutions and Continuity of Law.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 44-77. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
  • Gözler, Kemal. “Kurucu İktidar - Tali Kurucu İktidar Ayrımı: Tbmm Yeni Bir Anayasa Yapabilir Mi? .” (2011), http://www.anayasa.gen.tr/tbmm-yeni-anayasa.htm#_ftn5.
  • Green, Leslie. “Positivism and Conventionalism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12, no. 1 (1999): 35-52.
  • Harris, J. W. “When and Why Does the Grundnorm Change?” Cambridge Law Journal 29, no. 1 (1971): 103-33.
  • Hart, H. L. A. “Kelsen Visited.” UCLA Law Review 10 (1962-63): 712-28.
  • ———. Essays on Bentham- Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. London; New York: Clanderon Press- Oxford University 1982.
  • ———. The Concept of Law- with a Postscript Edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
  • Himma, Kenneth Einar. “The U.S. Constitution and the Conventional Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 95-122. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Jaume, Lucien. “Constituent Power in France: The Revolution and Its Consequences.” In The Paradox of Constitutionalism Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, edited by Neil Walker and Martin Loughlin, 67-86. Oxford - New York: Oxford University, 2007.
  • Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg: Russell&Russell, 1945.
  • ———. Pure Theory of Law, translated by Max Knight. 2nd ed. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith, 1989, reprint, translation from: Reine Rechtslehre. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Vienna: Deuticke 1960; First published 1967.
  • ———. General Theory of Norms. translated by Michael Hartney. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • ———. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory- a Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford ; New York Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • MacCormick, Neil. H.L.A. Hart. 1 ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1981.
  • ———. “Beyond the Sovereign State.” The Modern Law Review 56, no. 1 (1993): 1-18.
  • MacIntyre, A. C. “Hume On “Is” And “Ought”.” The Philosophical Review 68, no. 4 (1959): 451-68.
  • Martindale, Don. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theories. 2 ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1981.
  • Postema, Gerald J. “Coordination and Convention at the Foundation of Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 165-203.
  • Preuss, Ulrich K. “Constitutional Powermaking for the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations between Constituent Power and the Constitution.” Cardozo Law Review 14 (1992-1993): 639-60.
  • Raz, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System : An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System 2ed. Oxford: New York Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1980.
  • ———. Practical Reason and Norms. 2 ed. Princeton ; New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990. Reprint, revised edition of 1975 by Hutchinson Press.
  • Schauer, Frederick. “Amending the Presupposition of a Constitution.” In Responding to Imperfection : The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment edited by Sanford Levinson, 145-63. Princeton: Princeton University, 1995.
  • TBMM. “TBMM Başkanı Cemil Çiçek Başkanlığında Anayasa Hukuku Profesörleri İle Toplantı.” Ankara: TBMM, 2011. http://yenianayasa.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/anayasa-hukukculari-ile-toplanti.pdf
  • Turan, Mehmet “Anayasanın Ön Varsayımlarını Değiştirmek: Frederick Schauer’in Hukuk Sisteminin Hukuksal Olmayan veya Hukuk Dışı Temellerinin Değişimi Konusundaki Görüşleri.” Çankaya University Journal of Law 6, no. 1 (2011): 1-20.
  • Yalden-Thomson, D. C. . “Hume’s View of ‘Is-Ought’.” Philosophy 53, no. 203 (1978): 89-93.

(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar

Year 2011, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 109 - 132, 01.04.2011

Ali Acar

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

  • Ackerman, Bruce A. “The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” The Yale Law Journal 93, no. 6 (1984): 1013-72.
  • Albert, Richard. “Nonconstitutional Amendments.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence XXII, no. 1 (2009): 5-47.
  • Delacroix, Sylvie. “Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted.” Ratio Juris 17, no. 4 (2004): 501-20.
  • Dickson, Julie. “Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 3 (2007): 373-402.
  • Eekelaar, J. M. “The Principles of Revolutionary Legality.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 22-44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
  • Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Precedent-Based Constitutional Adjudication, Acceptance, and the Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the Us Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 47-68. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Finnis, John M. “Revolutions and Continuity of Law.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by A. W. B. Simpson, 44-77. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. Reprint, 1978.
  • Gözler, Kemal. “Kurucu İktidar - Tali Kurucu İktidar Ayrımı: Tbmm Yeni Bir Anayasa Yapabilir Mi? .” (2011), http://www.anayasa.gen.tr/tbmm-yeni-anayasa.htm#_ftn5.
  • Green, Leslie. “Positivism and Conventionalism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12, no. 1 (1999): 35-52.
  • Harris, J. W. “When and Why Does the Grundnorm Change?” Cambridge Law Journal 29, no. 1 (1971): 103-33.
  • Hart, H. L. A. “Kelsen Visited.” UCLA Law Review 10 (1962-63): 712-28.
  • ———. Essays on Bentham- Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory. London; New York: Clanderon Press- Oxford University 1982.
  • ———. The Concept of Law- with a Postscript Edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
  • Himma, Kenneth Einar. “The U.S. Constitution and the Conventional Rule of Recognition.” In The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution, edited by Matthew D. Adler and Kenneth Einar Himma, 95-122. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Jaume, Lucien. “Constituent Power in France: The Revolution and Its Consequences.” In The Paradox of Constitutionalism Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, edited by Neil Walker and Martin Loughlin, 67-86. Oxford - New York: Oxford University, 2007.
  • Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg: Russell&Russell, 1945.
  • ———. Pure Theory of Law, translated by Max Knight. 2nd ed. Gloucester, Mass: Peter Smith, 1989, reprint, translation from: Reine Rechtslehre. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Vienna: Deuticke 1960; First published 1967.
  • ———. General Theory of Norms. translated by Michael Hartney. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • ———. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory- a Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford ; New York Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • MacCormick, Neil. H.L.A. Hart. 1 ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1981.
  • ———. “Beyond the Sovereign State.” The Modern Law Review 56, no. 1 (1993): 1-18.
  • MacIntyre, A. C. “Hume On “Is” And “Ought”.” The Philosophical Review 68, no. 4 (1959): 451-68.
  • Martindale, Don. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theories. 2 ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1981.
  • Postema, Gerald J. “Coordination and Convention at the Foundation of Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 165-203.
  • Preuss, Ulrich K. “Constitutional Powermaking for the New Polity: Some Deliberations on the Relations between Constituent Power and the Constitution.” Cardozo Law Review 14 (1992-1993): 639-60.
  • Raz, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System : An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System 2ed. Oxford: New York Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1980.
  • ———. Practical Reason and Norms. 2 ed. Princeton ; New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990. Reprint, revised edition of 1975 by Hutchinson Press.
  • Schauer, Frederick. “Amending the Presupposition of a Constitution.” In Responding to Imperfection : The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment edited by Sanford Levinson, 145-63. Princeton: Princeton University, 1995.
  • TBMM. “TBMM Başkanı Cemil Çiçek Başkanlığında Anayasa Hukuku Profesörleri İle Toplantı.” Ankara: TBMM, 2011. http://yenianayasa.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/anayasa-hukukculari-ile-toplanti.pdf
  • Turan, Mehmet “Anayasanın Ön Varsayımlarını Değiştirmek: Frederick Schauer’in Hukuk Sisteminin Hukuksal Olmayan veya Hukuk Dışı Temellerinin Değişimi Konusundaki Görüşleri.” Çankaya University Journal of Law 6, no. 1 (2011): 1-20.
  • Yalden-Thomson, D. C. . “Hume’s View of ‘Is-Ought’.” Philosophy 53, no. 203 (1978): 89-93.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ali Acar This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Acar, A. (2011). (Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar. Cankaya University Journal of Law, 8(2), 109-132.
AMA Acar A. (Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar. Cankaya University Journal of Law. April 2011;8(2):109-132.
Chicago Acar, Ali. “(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar”. Cankaya University Journal of Law 8, no. 2 (April 2011): 109-32.
EndNote Acar A (April 1, 2011) (Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar. Cankaya University Journal of Law 8 2 109–132.
IEEE A. Acar, “(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar”, Cankaya University Journal of Law, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 109–132, 2011.
ISNAD Acar, Ali. “(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar”. Cankaya University Journal of Law 8/2 (April 2011), 109-132.
JAMA Acar A. (Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar. Cankaya University Journal of Law. 2011;8:109–132.
MLA Acar, Ali. “(Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar”. Cankaya University Journal of Law, vol. 8, no. 2, 2011, pp. 109-32.
Vancouver Acar A. (Yeni) Bir Anayasanın Nihai Normatiflik Kaynağı Nedir? Hukuki Pozitivizmden Yanıtlar. Cankaya University Journal of Law. 2011;8(2):109-32.