Mechanistic Insights into the Antimutagenic Action of Catechin, Epicatechin, and Caffeic Acid in Ames Assay

Abstract

Phenolic compounds are widely recognized for their diverse biological activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects, contributing significantly to human health. Among these, catechin, epicatechin, and caffeic acid have gained attention for their potential roles in maintaining DNA integrity. This study investigated the mutagenic and antimutagenic effects of these compounds using the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100, in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 fraction). Preliminary assays confirmed no cytotoxicity up to 5000 µg/plate, and none of the tested compounds exhibited mutagenic activity (mutation ratio ≤ 2). Antimutagenic evaluation demonstrated that catechin and epicatechin provided strong protection against frameshift mutations in TA98 without S9, with inhibition rates of 49–73% and 53–68%, respectively. This effect was slightly reduced under metabolic activation. In TA100, both compounds showed moderate inhibition without S9 but significantly enhanced activity with S9, reaching up to 88% and 67% inhibition, respectively, indicating effectiveness against metabolically activated mutagens. In contrast, caffeic acid exhibited moderate and variable antimutagenic activity, strongly influenced by concentration, strain type, and metabolic conditions. The higher efficacy of catechin and epicatechin is attributed to their structural complexity, multiple hydroxyl groups, and ability to scavenge free radicals and stabilize reactive intermediates, whereas the simpler structure of caffeic acid limits its protective capacity. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of dietary polyphenols in preserving genomic stability and support their potential applications in nutraceutical and pharmaceutical fields.

Keywords

• Ames test
• Antimutagenicity
• Catechin
• Caffeic acid
• Epicatechin

References

1. [1] Xu, L, Wang, X, 2025. A comprehensive review of phenolic compounds in horticultural plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences; 26: 5767.
2. [2] Li, L, Dai, X, Xiao, S, Tang, Z, Wang, Y, Yu, N, Xiong, T, Li, Y, 2025. Phenolic compounds, antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities from Moringa oleifera seed by-products. Scientific Reports; 15: 22878.
3. [3] de Oliveira, I, Santos-Buelga, C, Aquino, Y, Barros, L, Heleno, S A, 2025. New frontiers in the exploration of phenolic compounds and other bioactives as natural preservatives. Food Biosci; 68: 106571.
4. [4] Ahmed, Z S O, Khan, E, Elias, N, Elshebiny, A, Dou, Q, 2025. Updated review on natural polyphenols: Molecular mechanisms, biological effects, and clinical applications for cancer management. Biomolecules; 15: 629.
5. [5] Mercatante, D, Curró, S, Rosignoli, P, Cardenia, V, Sordini, B, Taticchi, A, Rodriguez-Estrada, M T, Fabiani, R, 2024. Effects of Phenols from Olive Vegetation Water on Mutagenicity and Genotoxicity of Stored-Cooked Beef Patties. Antioxidants; 13: 695.
6. [6] Esazadeh, K, Ezzati Nazhad Dolatabadi, J, Andishmand, H, Mohammadzadeh‐Aghdash, H, Mahmoudpour, M, Naemi Kermanshahi, M, Roosta, Y, 2024. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of tert‐butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxyanisole and propyl gallate as synthetic food antioxidants. Food Sci Nutr; 12: 7004–7016.
7. [7] del Carmen García-Rodríguez, M, Kacew, S, 2025. Green tea catechins: Protectors or threats to DNA? A review of their antigenotoxic and genotoxic effects. Archives of Toxicology; 99: 3485–3504.
8. [8] Musto, G, Schiano, E, Iannuzzo, F, Tenore, G C, Novellino, E, Stornaiuolo, M, 2023. Genotoxicity Assessment of Nutraceuticals Extracted from Thinned Nectarine (Prunus persica L.) and Grape Seed (Vitis vinifera L.) Waste Biomass. Foods; 12: 1171.

9. [9] Paege, N, Feustel, S, Marx-Stoelting, P, 2024. Toxicological evaluation of microbial secondary metabolites in the context of European active substance approval for plant protection products. Environmental Health; 23: 52.
10. [10] Biancheti, L M, Zaiter, M A, Pereira, E J, de Lemos, E G M, Boscolo, M, da Silva, R, Metzker, G, Gomes, E, 2026. Phenolic Compounds Derived from Plant Metabolism and Lignin: Biotransformation and Technological Applications. Waste and Biomass Valorization: 1–19.
11. [11] Baranwal, A, Aggarwal, P, Rai, A, Kumar, N, 2022. Pharmacological Actions and Underlying Mechanisms of Catechin: A Review. Mini-Rev Med Chem; 22: 821–833.
12. [12] Sun, M F, Jiang, C L, Kong, Y S, Luo, J L, Yin, P, Guo, G Y, 2022. Recent Advances in Analytical Methods for Determination of Polyphenols in Tea: A Comprehensive Review. Foods; 11.
13. [13] Maron, D M, Ames, B N, 1983. Revised Methods for the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test. Mutat Res; 113: 173–215.
14. [14] Zeiger, E, 2019. The test that changed the world: The Ames test and the regulation of chemicals. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En; 841: 43–48.
15. [15] Uysal, A, Bahgat, D M, Kilinç, F, Eldahshan, O A, Singab, A N B, Emre, G, Cetiz, M V, Uba, A I, Kul, M, Zengin, G, 2026. Unlocking the bio-potential of Erodium moschatum extracts: Chemical characterization, assessment of biological activity and in-silico approaches. Food Biosci; 78.
16. [16] Uysal, A, Gunes, E, Sarikurkcu, C, Celik, H, Durak, Y, Uren, M C, 2016. New Prospective Materials for Chemoprevention: Three Phlomis. Brit J Pharm Res; 10(3): 1–13.
17. [17] Nagabhushan, M, Amonkar, A, Nair, U, Santhanam, U, Ammigan, N, D'souza, A, Bhide, S, 1988. Catechin as an antimutagen: its mode of action. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology; 114: 177–182.
18. [18] Xie, R, Zhang, H, Lv, X, Lin, Q, Chen, B-H, Lai, Y-W, Chen, L, Teng, H, Cao, H, 2024. The evaluation of catechins reducing heterocyclic aromatic amine formation: Structure-activity relationship and mechanism speculation. Current Research in Food Science; 8: 100727.
19. [19] García-Rodríguez, M D C, Hernández-Cortés, L M, Mendoza-Núñez, V M, Arenas-Huertero, F, 2023. Effects of green tea polyphenols against metal-induced genotoxic damage: underlying mechanistic pathways. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B; 26: 371–386.
20. [20] Teófilo, M N G, Costa, L G, Rocha, J D, Barbosa, F G, Melo, A M d, de Matos, G G, Morgado, C M A, Fernandes, A S, de Carvalho, L B R, Gomes, C M, 2025. Bioactive compounds, antioxidant, cytotoxic, and genotoxic investigation of the standardized liquid extract from Eugenia involucrata DC. leaves. Pharmaceuticals; 18: 764.
21. [21] Geetha, T, Garg, A, Chopra, K, Kaur, I P, 2004. Delineation of antimutagenic activity of catechin, epicatechin and green tea extract. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis; 556: 65–74.
22. [22] Helvacioglu, S, Charehsaz, M, Bankoglu, E E, Stopper, H, Aydin, A, 2024. The ameliorative effect of rosmarinic acid and epigallocatechin gallate against doxorubicin-induced genotoxicity. Drug and Chemical Toxicology; 47: 1087–1099.
23. [23] Resende, F A, Barbosa, L C, Tavares, D C, de Camargo, M S, de Souza Rezende, K C, e Silva, M L d A, Varanda, E A, 2012. Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of (−)-hinokinin a trypanosomicidal compound measured by Salmonella microsome and comet assays. Bmc Complem Altern M; 12: 203.
24. [24] Alias, C, Zani, C, Zerbini, I, Feretti, D, 2025. Exploring the potential antimutagenic activity of foods from Mediterranean diet using the Ames test. Food Biosci: 107642.
25. [25] Yamada, J, Tomita, Y, 1996. Antimutagenic activity of caffeic acid and related compounds. Biosci Biotech Bioch; 60: 328–329.