Teachers' Perceptions of Principals' ICT Leadership

Abstract

This article focuses on the leadership used by the principal in a collaborative ICT project. The case study chosen was a school project conducted within the NCCE project (Nordic Cross Country Education). The EU funded project ran for three years in grades 5-9 in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. The goal of the project was to develop cross-border education models between the national education systems in the three countries. The project was based on virtual communication using digital technology. The study focuses on how the Swedish teachers from two schools involved in the NCCE project experienced the leadership of the principals in ICT related matters. A qualitative method was used by interviewing the teachers in order to inquire about what kind of support they had received from the school leadership on pedagogical issues, technical equipment and ICT competence. The ICT leadership was analyzed by Dexter’s three basic features: setting direction, developing people and making the organization work. The result showed two kinds of leadership. The first one resembled a distributed leadership, where the principal worked closely with teachers and ICT managers, almost like being one of the team. The second one resembled more a formal leadership where principals had a positive attitude towards ICT development but did not participate personally in the project work.

Keywords

• ICT integration, ICT leadership, Distributed leadership, School development

References

1. Augustinsson, S. & Brynolf, M. (2009). Rektors ledarskap, komplexitet och förändring. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
2. Bennett, N. (2008). Distributed Leadership and IT. In Joke Voogt and Gerald Knezek (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York Springer.
3. Berg, G. (2003). Att förstå skolan: En teori om skolan som institution och skolan som organisation. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
4. Berg, G. (2011). Skolledarskap och skolans frirum. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
5. Björkman, C. (2008). Internal capacities for school improvement: Principal´s views in Swedish secondary schools. Umeå: Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå Universitet.
6. Björkman, C. (2011). Skolans ledarskap som intern förbättringskapacitet. In J. Höög & O. Johansson (Eds.) Struktur, kultur och ledarskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
7. Bryderup, I.M. & Kowalski, K. (2002). The role of the local authories in the integration of ICT in learning. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 18, 470-479.
8. Denscomb, M. (2009). Forskningshandboken för småskaliga projekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

9. Dexter, S. (2008). Leadership for IT in Schools. . In Joke Voogt and Gerald Knezek (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. New York: Springer.
10. Ekholm, M., Blossing, U., Kåräng, G., Lindvall, K., & Scherp, H.Å. (2000). Forskning om rektor – en forskningsöversikt. Stockholm: Skolverket.
11. Elmore, R. (2008). Leadership as the practice of improvement. Improving school leadership, Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership. OECD publication. Available at: http://www.teindia.nic.in/Files/Improving_sch_Leadership/Improving_Sch_Leadership_ OECD-Vol-2.pdf
12. Erstad, O. (2011). Digitalt kompetanse i skoler. In Ola Erstad & Trond Eiliv Hauge (Eds.) Skoleutvikling og digitalemedier: Kompleksitet, mangfold, ekspansiv läring. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
13. Ertmer, P. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
14. Fejes, A. & Thornberg, R. (2009). Handbok i kvalitativ analys. Stockholm: Liber.
15. Friedman, V. (2001). Action Science: Creating Communities of Inquiry in Communities of Practice. I P. Reason och H. Bradbury (Eds.) Handbook of action research. London: Sage.
16. Grensjö, B. (2002). Erfarenheter sprids – Kunskaper används? Enkätstudie bland KK-stödda mindre skolutvecklingsprojekt. Pedagogiska Rapporter, Nr 67. Umeå: Pedagogiska Institutionen, Umeå Universitetet.
17. Grosin, L. (2003). Forskning om framgångsrika skolor som grund för skolutveckling. In G. Berg & H-G. Scherp (Eds.) Skolutvecklingens många ansikten. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.
18. Hallerström, H. (2006). Rektors Normer i ledarskapet för skolutveckling. Lunds universitet: Sociologiska institutionen.
19. Hallin, A & Karrbom Gustafsson, T. (2012). Projektledning. Malmö: Liber.
20. Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s role in school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
21. Harris, J., Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2009). teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
22. Hopkins, D. (2008). Realizing the potential of system leadership. In B. Pont, D. Nusche, D. Hopkins (Eds.) Improving school leadership, Volume 2: Case studies on system leadership. OECD publication. Available at: http://www.teindia.nic.in/Files/Improving_ sch_Leadership/Improving_Sch_Leadership_OECD-Vol-2.pd.
23. Hu, P.J., Clark, T.H. & Ma, W.M. (2003). Examining technology acceptance for school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 41(2), 227-241.
24. Höög J. & Johansson, O. (2011). Struktur, kultur, ledarskap – Ett projekt och dess resultat. In J. Höög & O. Johansson (Eds.) Struktur, kultur och ledarskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
25. Höög, O., Johansson O., & Olofsson, A. (2005). Successful principalship: The Swedish case. The Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 595-606.
26. Kvale, S. (2008) Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
27. Larsson, P. (2004). Förändringens villkor. En studie om organisatoriskt lärande och förändring inom skolan. Avhandling, Stockholm: Handelshögskolan.
28. Larsson, P. & Löwstedt, J. (2010). Strategier och Förändringsmyter, ett organisationsperspektiv på skolutveckling och lärares arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
29. Law, N. (2008). In search of explanations. In N. Law, W.J. Pelgrum & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from IEA SITES 2006 study. Dordrecht: Springer.
30. Ottestad, G. (2013). School leadership for ICT and teacher´s use of digital tools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 107-125.
31. Petersen, A-L. (2010). Pedagogiskt ledarskap i matematikundervisning. I S. Lagrosen, U. Lundh Snis & E. Nehls (Eds.) Lärande i och för det nya arbetslivet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
32. Petersen, A-L. (2012). Matematik behöver också en berättelse, om pedagogiskt ledarskap med fokus på elevens motivation. Acta Didactica Norge - Internasjonalt tidsskrift för fagdidaktisk forsknings-og utviklingsarbeid, 6(1), 1-17.
33. Petersen, A-L. (2013). Utvärdering av matematikprojekt i en kommuns fyra högstadieskolor år 2012. Rapport i Högskolan Västs rapportserie, Nr 2013:1. Available at: http://hv.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:600103/FULLTEXT01.pdf
34. Petersen, A-L. & Bunting, L. (2012). Pedagogical use of laptops in one-to-one environment in a Swedish primary school. In Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(4), 249-264.
35. Pont, B., Nusche, D. & Moorman, H. (2009). Förbättrat skolledarskap. OECD-rapport, Politik och Praktik, vol. 1. Stockholm: Skolverket.
36. Schibeci, R., MacCallum, J., Cumming-Potvin, W., Durrant, C., Kissane, B. & Miller, E-J. (2008). Teachers’ journeys towards critical use of ICT. Learning, Media and Technology. 33(4), 313-327.
37. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data (3 ed.). London: Sage.
38. Skolverket (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket.
39. Skolverket (2013). SIRIS database. Available at: http://siris.skolverket.se/siris/f?p=Siris:1:0
40. Stedİy, I.M. (2006). Hur blir man en duktig matematiklärare? In J. Boesen; G. Emanuelsson. A. Wallby, & K. Wallby (Eds.), Lära och undervisa matematik – Internationella perspektiv. Göteborg: Nationellt Centrum för Matematikutbildning.
41. Stuart, L.H., Mills, A.M. & Remus, U. (2009): School leaders, ICT competence and championing innovations. Computers and Education, 53(3), 733-741.
42. Ärlestig, H. (2011). Vardagssamtal och rektors pedagogiska ledarskap. I J. Höög & O. Johansson (Eds.), Struktur, kultur, ledarskap – Förutsättningar för framgångsrika skolor. Lund: Studentlitteratur
43. Correspondence: Ann-Louise Petersen, Department of Social and Behavioral Studies,
44. Educational Science and Languages, University West, Trollhattan, Sweden