Student Online Services Consumption: Routine Practices or Mistrust to Digital Service?

Abstract

The article aims to study the practices of students’ use of services in the conditions of digitalization. The leading methods for the study of this problem are the methods of questioning and testing, allowing to make a qualitative analysis of student consumption practices in the conditions of digitization of services. These methods allowed revealing the peculiarities of online consumption practices by students. The authors found that the majority of students who are not actively using online services, to some extent had experience using online services, but almost every tenth of them had negative result. It is established that students are distrustful of new methods to obtain services, especially when it comes to any operations related to money. It is shown that students who do not practice online services have a feeling that the provided online services are of poor quality, and informants are ready to experience some discomfort in exchange for the usual, guaranteed and high quality, in their opinion, service. In addition, students who are not actively using online services note that it is not easy for them to adapt to new technologically advanced things, but the rest of the students believe that they can adapt to innovations, but the way of providing services that is now perceived as traditional one is the most acceptable for them. It is established that the leader in the use of online services is a taxi. This service is used by all students to some extent, followed by the service of food delivery and only then online banking, online shopping and public services. The novelty and originality of the study lies in the fact that the features of consumption practices among students actively practicing online services and avoiding them are revealed. It is established that students who have little recourse to online services are wary of modern services, which is based either on the previous negative experience of use, or on the unsatisfactory experience of friends, believe that those techniques and applications that are now on the market are not optimal for them and the usual methods of obtaining services for them remain more comfortable and familiar, even though more time spent on obtaining a particular service. The practical significance lies in the fact that the data obtained in the work can be used in social psychology, age psychology, labor psychology, management, sociology, as well as for further theoretical development of this issue.

Keywords

• students,consumption,Internet,e-Commerce

References

1. Alisov, E. A, Cherdymova, E. I., Trubina, G. F., Yakushev, A. N., Zhdanov, S. P., Popova, O. V., & Kobzar-Frolova, M. N. (2018). Study of Dominant Type of Student Ecological Focus. Ekoloji 27(106), 357-362.
2. Belkin, A. S. (1991). Success Situation: how to create it. Moscow: Prosvescheniye.
3. Bolshakova, O. A. (2004). Modern priorities in the daily life of students: University studies and paid work. Values of daily activities of citizens. Moscow: Moscow Institute of sociology RAS.
4. Bozhovich, L. I. (1968). Personality and its formation in childhood. Moscow: Press.
5. Cherdymova, E. I., Afanasjeva, S. A., Parkhomenko, A. G., Ponyavina, M. B., Yulova, E. S., Nesmeianova, I. A., & Skutelnik, O. A. (2018). Student ecological consciousness as determining component of ecological-oriented activity. Eurasian Journal of Biosciences, 12(2), 167-174
6. Cherdymova, E. I., Prokopyev, A. I., Karpenkova, T. V., Pravkin, S. A., Ponomareva, N. S., Kanyaeva, O. M., Ryazapova, L. Z., & Anufriev, A. F. (2019). EcoArt Therapy as a Factor of Students’ Environmental Consciousness Development. Ekoloji, 28(107), 687-693.
7. Goroshko, E. I. (2010). Communicative space of the Internet as an object of socio-cultural analysis. Bulletin of Odessa national University. Odessa, 15(14), 130 - 136.
8. Gurov, O. N., & Baudrillard, J. (2003). Approaches to the study of consumer culture. Moscow: AST.

9. Hague, M. (2002). Fundamentals of e-business. Moscow: FAIR-PRESS.
10. Ilyin, V. I. (2008). Consumption as a discourse. St. Petersburg: Intersocis.
11. Kalugina, O. A., & Tarasevich, N. A. (2018). Smart technology integration into EFL teaching at the non-linguistic higher school. XLinguae, 11(1XL), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.01XL.02
12. Khalin, V. G., & Chernova, G. V. (2018). Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Retrieved on 21 April 2019 from https://cyberleninka.ru/arti-cle/n/tsifrovizatsiya-i-ee-vliyanie-na-rossiyskuyu-ekonomiku-i-obschestvo-preimuschestva-vyzovy-ugrozy-i-riski
13. Lazinin, I. V. (2011). Consumption as a cultural phenomenon: modern specific. Bulletin of Stavropol state University. Philosophy science, 76, 18-25.
14. Ovrutsky, A. V. (2014). Sociology of consumption: main directions of research. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University.
15. Ozhegov, S. I. (2011). Dictionary of Russian language. Moscow: World and Education, Onyx.
16. Pashkov, A. S. (1988). The Way of life of a large city population: a comprehensive social studies. Leningrad: Publishing house of Leningrad state University.
17. Pirogov, S. V. (2003). E-Commerce. Moscow: Publishing House “Social relations”, publishing House “Perspektiva”.
18. Radaev, V. V. (2004). Economic sociology in Russia: formation and development. Economic sociology, 5(3), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2004-3-94-109
19. Radaev, V. V. (2005). Sociology of consumption: basic approaches. Sociological research, NRU HSE, 1, 12-25.
20. Radaev, V. V., Kotelnikova, Z. V., & Markin, M. E. (2009). Development of Russian retail: measures of state regulation and their consequences. Analytics of Laboratory for studies in economic sociology. Moscow: Publishing house of the HSEp.
21. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: Eksmo.
22. Sorokoumova, E. A., Cherdymova, E. I., Rezvantseva, M. O., Kochneva, L. V., Latysheva, V. V., & Perkova, E. P. (2019). Environmental and Social Practices of Old Stuff Use and Disposal by Students. Ekoloji, 28(107), 5065-5069.
23. Tatarintseva, Yu. O. (2016). Consumer Culture as a sociological category. Bulletin of TSU, Series of social Sciences, 3(7), 66-76.
24. Vasbieva, D. G., Sokolova, N. L., Masalimova, A. R., Shinkaruk, V. M., & Kiva-Khamzina, Y. L. (2018). Exploring the EFL teacher’s role in a smart learning environment – a review study. XLinguae, 11(2), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.21
25. Zhilina, L. N., & Frolova, N. T. (1969). Problems of consumption and education of personality. Moscow: Mysl.