Research Article

Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions

Volume: 11 Number: 1 March 1, 2020
  • Erin Stratton
  • George Chitiyo *
  • Allen M. Mathende
  • Krista M. Davis
EN

Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare how face-to-face instruction and flipped learning differed in terms of student achievement in seventh grade science classes, as well as to assess how students who were in the flipped classroom felt about their experiences. A total of 81 students received face-to-face instruction, and 73 received flipped instruction. All students completed pre- and post-assessments. Additionally, students in the flipped classroom completed a survey to assess perceptions of their experiences with the flipped model. Analysis of variance results showed no differences in performance between the two groups of students. There were also no interactions between instructional method with both gender and ability. The student survey data showed that the majority of students enjoyed the flipped model. Large percentages of students reported increased engagement and motivation under the flipped model. In conclusion, we found that flipped instruction was as effective as face-to-face instruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Agnello, V., Pikas, B., Agnello, A. J., & Pikas, A. (2011). Today’s learner, preferences in teaching techniques. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v4i2.3556
  2. Alvarez, B. (2012). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. Education Digest, 77(8), 18-21.
  3. Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The flipped classroom teaching model and its use for information literacy instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.161
  4. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International society for technology in education.
  5. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2015). Flipped learning for science instruction. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education.
  6. Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The Impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept meaning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142.
  7. Blair, E., Maharaj, C., & Primus, S. (2015). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1465-1482 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5
  8. Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement and achievement. Graduate Research Papers. 137. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/137

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Erin Stratton This is me
0000-0001-7520-6992
United States

George Chitiyo * This is me
0000-0002-0264-6513
United States

Allen M. Mathende This is me
0000-0002-7261-0065
United States

Krista M. Davis This is me
0000-0003-2198-4822
United States

Publication Date

March 1, 2020

Submission Date

September 26, 2019

Acceptance Date

October 21, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 11 Number: 1

APA
Stratton, E., Chitiyo, G., Mathende, A. M., & Davis, K. M. (2020). Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646888
AMA
1.Stratton E, Chitiyo G, Mathende AM, Davis KM. Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2020;11(1):131-142. doi:10.30935/cet.646888
Chicago
Stratton, Erin, George Chitiyo, Allen M. Mathende, and Krista M. Davis. 2020. “Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-Face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions”. Contemporary Educational Technology 11 (1): 131-42. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646888.
EndNote
Stratton E, Chitiyo G, Mathende AM, Davis KM (March 1, 2020) Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology 11 1 131–142.
IEEE
[1]E. Stratton, G. Chitiyo, A. M. Mathende, and K. M. Davis, “Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions”, Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 131–142, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.30935/cet.646888.
ISNAD
Stratton, Erin - Chitiyo, George - Mathende, Allen M. - Davis, Krista M. “Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-Face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions”. Contemporary Educational Technology 11/1 (March 1, 2020): 131-142. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646888.
JAMA
1.Stratton E, Chitiyo G, Mathende AM, Davis KM. Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2020;11:131–142.
MLA
Stratton, Erin, et al. “Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-Face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions”. Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 131-42, doi:10.30935/cet.646888.
Vancouver
1.Erin Stratton, George Chitiyo, Allen M. Mathende, Krista M. Davis. Evaluating Flipped Versus Face-to-face Classrooms in Middle School on Science Achievement and Student Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2020 Mar. 1;11(1):131-42. doi:10.30935/cet.646888