Collective Efficacy and its Relationship with Leadership in Computer-mediated Project-based Group Work

Year 2014, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 21, 01.03.2014

Yeol Huh Charles M. Reigeluth Dabae Lee

Abstract

Based on Bandura’s work, the four sources of efficacy shaping were examined in regard to frequency and students’ perception of importance in a computer-mediated, project-based high school classroom. In a context of group work where there was no designated leader, groups’ collective efficacy was examined if it has any relationship with individual’s leadership traits. In addition, the relationship between the existence of group-identified leader and the groups’ collective efficacy as well as the relationship between the collective efficacy and the groups’ performance outcome were examined. The results from survey and interview showed that mastery experience was the most frequent and powerful source of efficacy shaping among the four sources. Moreover, the groups with identified leader showed higher collective efficacy than the groups without leaders, and the groups’ collective efficacy level showed positive correlation with the groups’ performance outcome.

Keywords

Collective efficacy, Leadership traits, Computer-based PBL, Group performance

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139-161. doi: Doi: 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. 5. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• Bass, B.M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Raw.
• Chen, G. & Bliese, P.D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549-556. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.549
• George, T. R. & Feltz, D. L. (1995). Motivation in sport from a collective efficacy perspective. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26(1), 98-116.
• Gibson, C. B. (1999). Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy and group effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 138-152.
• Gibson, C. B., Randel, A., & Earley, P. C. . (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group & Organization Management, 25, 67-97.
• Goddard, R.D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467-476. doi: 10.1037//0022- 0663.93.3.467
• Goddard, R.D. (2003). The impact of schools on teacher beliefs, influence, and student achievement: The role of collective efficacy. In J. Raths & A. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 6, pp. 183-204). Westport, CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Hoy, A.K. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033003003
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K.A., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J.M. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819-832. doi: 10.1037/0021- 9010.87.5.819
• Hoyt, C.L., Murphy, S.E., Halverson, S.K., & Watson, C.B. (2003). Group Leadership: Efficacy and Effectiveness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 259-274. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.259
• Jex, S. M. & Gudanowski, D. M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: An exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 509-517.
• Kirkpatrick, S. A. & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? The Executive, 5, 48-60.
• Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of management Review, 20(3), 645-678.
• Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice. . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Parker, L. E. (1994). Working Together: Perceived Self- and Collective-Efficacy at the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 43-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00552.x
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2010). Framework for 21st century learning. http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=120
• Reigeluth, C.M., Watson, W.R., Watson, S.L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N.D.P. (2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 48(6), 32-39. http://jaems.jp/contents/news/130_LMS.pdf
• Riggs, M. L. & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 755-766.
• Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and Validation of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Scales for Job-Related Applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 793-802. doi: 10.1177/0013164494054003026
• Stajkovic, A.D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A.J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814-828. doi: 10.1037/a0015659
• Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35-71.
• Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
• Walumbwa, F.O., Wang, P., Lawler, J.J., & Shi, K. (2004). The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 515-530.
• Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
• Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, U., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. New York: Plenum.
• Correspondence: Yeol Huh, Instructor, Department of Instructional Systems Technology, School of
• Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States