Perceived Quality of Distance Education from the User Perspective

Year 2014, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 121 - 145, 01.06.2014

Tolga Dursun Kader Oskaybas Cansu Gokmen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure the quality of distance education services received from educational institutions which are among the leading service enterprises. More specifically, the study aim to find out what the students’ expectations are, to what extent the student expectations are met and whether or not the acquired findings vary according to demographical characteristics of students. Moreover, this study is an attempt to assess if there are any differences among similar higher education institutions that implement distance learning programs in terms of the perceived quality of their educational services. It is hoped to help improve the quality of existing higher distance education services by evaluations based on the results of a comparative study. Therefore, through the SERVQUAL methodology, the current study has focused on determining the level of satisfaction regarding expectations and perceptions of students as customers. The data in the study were collected through a survey administered to a total of 463 university students. The examination of partial SERVQUAL scores and relevant analyses indicate that expectations are not met for any of the five dimensions affecting service quality in the universities providing e-MBA education through distance learning.

Keywords

Distance education, Service quality, SERVQUAL, Higher education, Service expectations, User perspective

References

• Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: Three instruments compared. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29, 71-89.
• Altınbasak, I., Akyol A., Alkibay, S., Arslan M., Burnaz, S., Cengiz, E., Erdil, S., Gegez, E., Gunay, N., Madran, C., Sekerkaya, A., Uydaci, M., Unusan, C., Yalci, A., & Yolac, G. (2008). Kuresel pazarlama yonetimi (1. baski). Istanbul: Beta.
• Altunkaya, N. (1997). Egitim sorunumuza kuş bakisi. Ankara: Urun.
• Armstrong, G. & Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing: An introduction (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S. A. (1994, January). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125-131.
• Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: New American Library.
• Cabuk, S., Inan, H., & Mutlu, S. (2007). Gida sektorunde hizmet kalitesinin olculmesi (Adana kentsel alanda kebapci ornegi). Cukurova Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 16(2), 85-96.
• Degermen, H. A. (2006). Hizmet urunlerinde kalite, musteri tatmini ve sadakati: Hizmet kalitesi ile musteri sadakatinin saglanması ve GSM sektorunde bir uygulama. Istanbul: Türkmen.
• Deming, W. E. (1998). Krizden cikis (Trans. C. Akas). Istanbul: Kalder.
• Eleren, A., Bektas, C., & Gormus, A. S. (2007). Hizmet sektorunde hizmet kalitesinin SERVQUAL yontemi ile olculmesi ve hazir yemek isletmesinde bir uygulama. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 44, 75-88.
• Etzel, M. J., Walker, B. J., & Stanton, W. J. (1997). Marketing (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• George, D. & P. Mallery. (2001). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update (3th press). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Gegez, A. E. (2010). Pazarlama arastirmalari (Gelistirilmis 3. baski). Istanbul: Beta.
• Karahan, K. (2000). Hizmet pazarlaması (1. baski). Istanbul: Beta.
• Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2006). Principles of marketing (11th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (11th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Nakip, M. (2006). Pazarlama arastirmalari: Teknikler ve uygulamalar (2. basım). Ankara: Seckin.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry. L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: Multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
• Parasuraman, A. & Berry, L. L. (1991). Marketing services: Competing through quality. New York: Macmillan.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L.L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 58, 111-24.
• Sekerkaya, A. K. (1997). Bankacilik hizmetlerinde algilanan toplam kalite olcumu. Ankara: Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu (Yayin No:87).
• Turk Dil Kurumu. (2005). Turkce sozluk. Ankara: Turk Dil Kurumu.
• Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu (DIE-TUIK). (2009, 13 Subat). Dunya’da ve Turkiye’de hizmet sektoru verileri. Retrieved on 30 March 2009 from http://www.die. gov.tr.
• Zeithaml, V. A., Berry L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35- 48.
• Zeithaml, V. A., Berry L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996).The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.
• Zeithaml, V. A. & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Services marketing (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Zeithaml, V.A., Bitner, M. J., & Dwayne, D. G. (2006). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Correspondence: Kader Oskaybas, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economic and
• Administrative Sciences, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey