Concerns of Teachers about the Implementation of Information and Communication Technology Curriculum in Basic Education in Ghana

Year 2017, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 103 - 118, 17.04.2017

Frederick Kwaku Sarfo Francis Amankwah Stephen Baafi-frimpong Joseph Asomani

Abstract

Research findings in the literature show that teachers’ concern about change process is
extremely personal and it influences the implementation of innovation. This study aimed at
assessing information and communication technology teachers’ stages of concern regarding
the implementation of information and communication technology (ICT) curriculum in basic
schools. It also examined the effects of teachers’ personal factors or variablessuch as gender
and teaching experience on their stages of concern towards the implementation of ICT
curriculum. Modified Stages of Concerns Questionnaires (SoCQ) (Hall, George & Rutherford
1979) based on Concern Based Adoption Model (CBAM) were used to collect data from 346
respondents. Data collected were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.
The result of the study showed that teachers generally had their first and second high
concerns at informational and consequence stages respectively and with low concern at
awareness stage. Furthermore, statistically significant difference was found between gender
and informational, management, consequence, collaboration and refocusing concerns.
However, according to the results, teachers’ stages of concerns were not related to their
teaching experience.

Keywords

information and communication technology, curriculum implementation, basic education, teacher concerns

References

• Acquah, B.Y.S. (2012). Status of implementation of the ICT curriculum in Ghanaian basic schools. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(3), 27-37.
• Albrini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computer Education, 47(4), 373-398.
• AL-Rawajfih, K., Fong, S. F., & Idros, S. N. S. (2010). Stages of concern in integrating e-learning in discovery schools. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 54-63.
• Alshammari, B. S. (2000). The developmental stages of concern of teachers toward the implementation of the information technology curriculum in Kuwait. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.
• Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367.
• Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136-155.
• Cetinkaya, B. (2012). Understanding teachers in the midst of reform: Teachers’ concerns about reformed sixth grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(3), 155-166.
• Cheung, D. & Ng, D. (2000). Teachers’ stages of concern about the target-oriented curriculum. Educational Journal, 28(1), 226-237.
• Chrysostomou, M., & Mousoulides, N. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs about the adoption of new technologies in the mathematics curriculum. Proceedings of CERME 6 (pp. 1270-1279). Lyon, France.
• Cobbold, C., & Ani-Boi, E. (2011). Primary school teachers’ concerns about implementing the 2007 educational reform in Ghana: A study in the Cape Coast metropolis. International Journal of Basic Education, 1(1), 122-132.
• Cunningham, C. (2007). Linking STEM and communication technology research: A research agenda for technology and gender equality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of NCA 93rd Annual Convention, TBA, Chicago, IL.
• Dubey, D. A. & Alam, M. (2014). Developing Fiji: Measuring the concerns of pre-service students for ICT in education. European Scientific Journal, 1(28), 195-24
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363 -406.
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4thed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualisation. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207 -226.
• Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4thed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.
• Gokcek, T. & Baki, A. (2013).Turkish mathematics teachers concerns about the curriculum reform in the first year of implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 177-190.
• Grimus, M. (2000). ICT and multimedia in the primary school. Paper presented at the 16th Conference on Educational Uses of Information and Communication Technologies. Beijing, China.
• Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1979). Measuring stages of concerns about the innovation: A manual for use of soc questionnaire. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
• Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Hall, G. E. &Hord, S. M. (2006). Improving change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (2nded.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., &Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
• Hawes (1993). Academic computing from a technological innovation perspective: Faculty concerns (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, USA.
• Hord, S. M. (1990). Realising school improvement through understanding the change process. Southeast Educational Laboratory, 1(1), 1-4.
• Hossain, S. (2000). Stakeholder identification and analysis in the adoption of IT in education. (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
• Kanu, Y. & Glor, M. (2006). ‘Currere’ to the rescue? Teachers as ‘amateur intellectuals’ in a knowledge society. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 101 -122.
• Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
• Kwarteng, J. T. (2009). Status of accounting curriculum implementation: A concerns-based adoption model assessment in Ashanti and Central regions (Unpublished MPhil thesis). University of Cape Coast.
• Lau, J. & Shiu, J. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of implementing innovation: The use of pair work in large-scale and assessment in Hong Kong. Retrieved on 4 November 2016 from at http://www.iaea2008.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/digitalAssests/164801- _Lau.pdf. Accessed on 23/03/2014.
• Marsh, C. J. & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues (4thed). Upper saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Ministry of Education (2008). ICT in education policy. Accra, Ghana: MOE.
• Oliver, A. I. (1965). Curriculum improvement: A guide to problems, principles and procedures. New York: Dodd Mead Company.
• Ontario (2016). 21st century competencies: Foundation document for discussion. USA: The Ontario Public Service.
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
• Roxie, V. (2005). Teacher concerns during implementation of instructional management tool in public high school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 56-64.
• UNESCO (2002). ICT in teacher education: A planning satisfaction with asynchronous teaching and guide. UNESCO, Division of Higher Education.
• Van den Berg, R. &Ros, A. (1999). The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 879-906.
• Wang, W. (2014). Teachers’ stages of concerns and levels of use of a curriculum innovation in China: A case study. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 22-31.