An Investigation of Reading Comprehension Questions in the Coursebooks “Yedi İklim” and “Yeni Hitit” for Teaching Turkish As A Foreign Language

Abstract

The study aims to analyze the forms and levels of the reading comprehension questions in the coursebooks “Yedi İklim” and “Yeni Hitit” commonly used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language based on Widdowson (1993) question form classification and Barrett’s (1976) taxonomy of cognitive and affective dimensions of reading comprehension. The data for the study consisted of two hundred seventy two reading comprehension texts and all questions related with them in the coursebooks. The descriptive survey research design was employed in the study. Also quantitative method was applied to identify the frequency of the question forms and levels in the data. Results revealed that most of the questions in both coursebooks were in the form of Wh-question and these questions took place in the literal level as the basic/lowest level. The questions in both coursebooks required students to understand ideas and information explicitly stated in the reading text. In other words, they did not require detailed thinking. Therefore it was thought that they did not develop students’ thinking process adequately.

Keywords

• Reading comprehension questions
• lower and higher level of thinking
• Widdowson’s question form classification
• Barrett’s taxonomy
• coursebooks.

References

1. Referans 1 Acosta, I. M. E., and Ferri, M. M. (2010). Reading Strategies to Develop Higher Thinking Skills for Reading Comprehension. Estrategias De Lectura Para El Desarrollo De Habilidades De Pensamiento Para La Comprensión De Lectura, 12(1): 107-123
2. Referans 2 Adams, W.R. (1985). Developing Reading Versatility (4th ed.).New York: CBS College Publishing.
3. Referans 3 Akyol, H. (1997). Okuma metinlerindeki soruların sınıflandırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 21, 10-17.
4. Referans 4 Akyol, H. (2001). İlköğretim okulları 5. sınıf Türkçe kitaplarındaki okuma metinleriyle ilgili soruların analizi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 26, 169-178.
5. Referans 5 Akyol,H.,Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S., and Çetinkaya, Ç. (2013). Anlamaya Yönelik Ne tür Sorular Soruyoruz? Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 9, Sayı 1, 41-56.
6. Rerefans 6 Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 280-318. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002280
7. Referans 7 Anggraeni, A. (2013). The Analysis of Reading Questions Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in English Textbooks for Senior High Schools Grade X. Thesis. English Department, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang : Malang.
8. Referans 8 Baker, P.,G. Costas, K. Majid, K. Michal, M. Tony and R. Wodak. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press. Discourse & Society, 19 (3), 273-306.

9. Referans 9 Barrett, T.C. (1976). Taxonomy of Reading Comprehension. In R.Smith and T.C.Barrett (Eds), Teaching Reading in the Middle Grades (pp.51-58). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Referans 10 Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1-18.Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss40/3
11. Referans 11 Bisazza, A. (2009). Designing a NooJ module for Turkish. Proceedings of NooJ Conference 2009.
12. Referans 12 Blooms, B. (1956). Revised Taxonomy. Retrieved from http://www.kurwongbss.qld.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/blooms.htm
13. Referans 13 Bozkurt,Ü.,Uzun,L.,and Lee,Y. (2015). Korece ve Türkçe Ders Kitaplarındaki Metin Sonu Sorularının Karşılaştırılması: PISA 2009 Sonuçlarına Dönük Bir Tartışma. International Journal of Language Academy, 3(4),295-313.
14. Referans 14 Çelik,T.,Demircan,G., and Fidan, D. (2015). Okur Dostu Metin Olma Özelliği ile Okuduğunu Anlama Başarısı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Başkent Unıversıty Journal of Educatıon, 2(1), 115-122.
15. Referans 15 Demirhan, U. U.,and Aksan, M. (2011). Tagset for NooJ Turkish module. NooJ Conference 2011, 13-15 June 2011, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
16. Referans 16 Fitria,E. (2014). An Analysıs of Readıng Comprehensıon Questıons InTextbooks “Englısh Texts in Use and Look Ahead” For Senıor Hıgh School Grade X. Journal English Language Teaching (ELT), 2 ( 2), 1-15.
17. Referans 17 Frazee, B.,and Rudnitski, R. A. (1995). Integrated teaching methods. Albany: Delmar Publishers.
18. Referans 18 Grabe, W.,and Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education
19. Referans 19 Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Referans 20 Göçer,V. (2014). The assessment of Turkısh wrıtten examınatıon questıons based on the text ın accordance wıth the Barrett’s taxonomy. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching,Volume 3, 1-16
21. Referans 21 Gunning, T.G. 1992. Creating Reading Instruction for All Children. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
22. Referans 22 Mikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching Reading in a Second Language. Retrieved from: http://www.longmanhomeusa.com/content/FINAL-LO%20RES-Mikulecky-Reading%20Monograph%20.pdf.
23. Referans 23 Myers, S.S. (1991). Performance in Reading Comprehension- Product or Process? Educational Review, 43(3), 257-272.
24. Referans 24 Paris, S. G., and Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 13.1, 5-22.
25. Referans 25 Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds? New York: Harper & Row.
26. Referans 26 Sunggingwati, D. (2003). Reading questions of junior high school English textbooks. Bahasa Dan Seni, 31(1), 84–105
27. Referans 27 Turner, T.N. (1988). Comprehension: Reading for Meaning. Higher Level of Comprehension: Inference, Critical, and Creative Reading. Questioning Techniques: Probing for Greater Meaning . In J.E.Alexander (Ed.). Teaching Reading. (3rd ed.) (pp.159-238) Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company.
28. Referans 28 Urquhart, S., and Weir, C. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. (1st ed.). London and New York: Longman.
29. Referans 29 Vacca, J.A.L., Vacca, R.T., and Gove, M.K. (1991). Reading and Learning to Read (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
30. Referans 30 Vancı-Osam, Ü. (1992). Anadilde Okuma Becerisine Yönelik Stratejiler: Ders Kitapları Düzeyinde Bir Araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,Cilt.8, Sayı.3. 365-381.
31. Referans 31 Widdowson, H. G. (1993). Learning purpose and language use. London: Oxford University Press.