Glycemic Control Practices in Intensive Care Units: A National Survey Study
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate current glycemic management practices among intensive care unit (ICU) physicians in Türkiye, to identify inter-specialty and institutional variations, and to propose strategies for standardization in accordance with international guidelines.
Methods: This cross-sectional, multicentre survey was conducted in 17 tertiary hospitals across Türkiye. The study population comprised specialists and residents from various medical disciplines, including intensive care unit (ICU), anesthesiology, internal medicine, pulmonology, and surgery. A 27-item guideline-based questionnaire was utilized to assess glucose thresholds, monitoring frequency, insulin therapy strategies, and the management of specific patient populations, including diabetic ketoacidosis and chronic organ failure. Construct validity (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin = 0.72; Bartlett’s test, p < 0.001) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.75) were confirmed. The data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 83 physicians (67 specialists and 16 residents) participated. Reported hypoglycemia thresholds ranged from 60 to 90 mg/dL, while hyperglycemia thresholds ranged from 200 to 280 mg/dL. Seventy percent of respondents monitored blood glucose at least four times daily, and 56% preferred continuous insulin infusion for hyperglycemia management. Internal medicine specialists demonstrated higher adherence to frequent glucose monitoring (OR= 4.12, p=0.038) and insulin infusion use (OR=2.35, p=0.019) compared with anesthesiologists. HbA1c measurement was used by only 17% of participants, and continuous glucose monitoring was minimal. Hourly glucose monitoring in diabetic ketoacidosis was reported by 45% of respondents and was more frequent in university hospitals (OR = 2.30, p = 0.023).
Conclusion: The management of glycemic levels in Turkish intensive care units (ICUs) exhibits significant heterogeneity, influenced by the specialty of the attending physician and the availability of institutional resources. The limited utilization of HbA1c testing and continuous glucose monitoring underscores the critical gaps in standardization. The implementation of unified national protocols, the expansion of multidisciplinary training programs, and increased support for continuous glucose monitoring may improve glycemic control and patient outcomes in ICUs across Türkiye.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- Kansagara D, Fu R, Freeman M, Wolf F, Helfand M. Intensive insulin therapy in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(4):268-82. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-4-201102150-00008.
- Moghissi ES, Korytkowski MT, DiNardo M, Einhorn D, Hellman R, Hirsch IB, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009;15(4):353-69. doi:10.4158/EP09102.RA.
- Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1359-67. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa011300.
- NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283-97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810625.
- Niven DJ, Rubenfeld GD, Kramer AA, Stelfox HT. Effect of published scientific evidence on glycemic control in adult intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):801-9. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0157.
- Jacobi J, Bircher N, Krinsley J, Agus M, Braithwaite SS, Deutschman C, et al. Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(12):3251-76. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182653269.
- World Health Organization. Global health workforce statistics database [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2026 May 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/health-workforce
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Standards of care in diabetes-2025. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(Suppl 1):S1-5. doi:10.2337/dc25-SINT.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Intensive Care
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
May 22, 2026
Publication Date
May 31, 2026
Submission Date
February 11, 2026
Acceptance Date
May 17, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 3 Number: 2