Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study

Sevinc Askerbeyli Örs; Ceren Şanap

doi:10.65022/clindentres.1751131

Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study

Abstract

Background and Aim: Three-dimensional (3D)-printed endodontic tooth models have been proposed as alternatives to extracted teeth in preclinical education. This study aimed to compare the educational value and usability of three commercially available 3D-printed endodontic training models based on undergraduate dental students’ perceptions. Materials and Methods: Fifty-seven dental students with prior preclinical endodontic training performed standardized root canal procedures on three different mandibular molar models produced by stereolithography using distinct photopolymer resins. Each student completed a structured questionnaire evaluating morphological features, material characteristics, radiographic properties, and overall clinical handling. Responses were recorded using Likert-type scales. Quantitative data were analyzed using Friedman’s Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks with a significance level of 0.05. Open-ended responses were evaluated thematically. Results: Friedman test revealed statistically significant differences among the models across several domains (p<0.05). The Edudent model had the highest median scores in anatomical realism, material hardness, apical feedback, and file handling (p<0.001). The Ancorax model exhibited superior radiographic contrast (p<0.001), while the BTech model consistently showed lower performance. Qualitative feedback emphasized the need for enhanced internal canal complexity, radiopacity and tactile resistance. Conclusions: Educational performance varied significantly among the tested models. Continued refinement is necessary to improve clinical realism and training outcomes.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This study was reviewed and approved by the Hacettepe University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (Approval No: SBA-25/569)

References

1. Nagendrababu V, Gopinath VK, Nassar M, Narasimhan S, Abbott PV, Duncan HF. A multi-national survey-based evaluation of undergraduate/predoctoral endodontic education. Int Endod J 2024; 57: 1-10.
2. Decurcio DA, Lim E, Chaves GS, Nagendrababu V, Estrela C, Rossi- Fedele G. Pre-clinical endodontic education outcomes between artificial versus extracted natural teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod J 2019; 52: 1153-1161.
3. Longridge NN, Dutta A, Fox K. Endodontic education - present status and future directions. Br Dent J 2025; 238: 567-572.
4. Zhang R, Tang R, Spintzyk S, Tian Y, Xiang Y, Xu Y et al. Three- Dimensional Printed Tooth Model with Root Canal Ledge: A Novel Educational Tool for Endodontic Training. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11: 1-10.
5. Kucher M, Dannemann M, Modler N, Böhm R, Hannig C, Kühne MT. Determination of a Representative and 3D-Printable Root Canal Geometry for Endodontic Investigations and Pre-Clinical Endodontic Training-An Ex Vivo Study. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11: 1-10.
6. Kolling M, Backhaus J, Hofmann N, Keß S, Krastl G, Soliman S et al. Students’ perception of three-dimensionally printed teeth in endodontic training. Eur J Dent Educ 2022; 26: 653-661.
7. Tsai ST, Ho YC, Tsai CL, Yang SF, Lai YL, Lee SY. Evaluation of students’ self-assessment performance in preclinical endodontic training by means of rubrics and a 3D printed model. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121: 2203-2210.
8. Reymus M, Liebermann A, Diegritz C, Keßler A. Development and evaluation of an interdisciplinary teaching model via 3D printing. Clin Exp Dent Res 2021; 7: 3-10.

9. Fakhr M, Nagy MM. Three-Dimensional tooth models for better teaching and treatment outcomes. Eur J Dent Educ 2023; 27: 695- 699.
10. Meglioli M, Mergoni G, Artioli F, Ghezzi B, Manfredi M, Macaluso GM et al. A Novel Self-Assessment Method for Training Access Cavity on 3D Printed Endodontic Models. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11: 1-9.
11. Tchorz JP, Brandl M, Ganter PA, Karygianni L, Polydorou O, Vach K et al. Pre-clinical endodontic training with artificial instead of extracted human teeth: does the type of exercise have an influence on clinical endodontic outcomes? Int Endod J 2015; 48: 888-893.
12. Reymus M, Stawarczyk B, Winkler A, Ludwig J, Kess S, Krastl G et al. A critical evaluation of the material properties and clinical suitability of in-house printed and commercial tooth replicas for endodontic training Int Endod J 2020; 53: 1446-1454.
13. Amornrattanavej A, Yanpiset K, Jantarat J. Mechanical properties evaluation of two resin-based three-dimensional printing materials and dentine for endodontic training model fabrication: In vitro study. Aust Endod J 2024; 50: 267-275.
14. Hanafi A, Donnermeyer D, Schäfer E, Bürklein S. Perception of a modular 3D print model in undergraduate endodontic education. Int Endod J 2020; 53: 1007-1016.
15. Yekta-Michael SS, Färber CM, Heinzel A. Evaluation of new endodontic tooth models in clinical education from the perspective of students and demonstrators. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21: 447.
16. Karagkounaki A, Manoukakis T, Margariti I, Pavlou C, Hadjichristou C. 3D Printing in Dental Education: A Review of Its Use across Disciplines. J Dent Educ 2025; 89: 13876.
17. Tawasinchanadech N, Thammasitboon S, Buranadham S, Thammasitboon K. Mastery Learning in Preclinical Endodontics Using Customized 3D-Printed Tooth Models for Deliberate Practice: An Application of Educational Design Research. J Endod 2024; 50: 1273-1280.
18. Höhne C, Schmitter M. 3D Printed Teeth for the Preclinical Education of Dental Students. J Dent Educ 2019; 83: 1100-1106.
19. Piasecki L, Schwartz K, Tsou C, Arany P, Ratakonda M, Romero M et al. 3D prototyped macro-models as educational aid for teaching endodontic access in preclinical training: Assessment of students’ learning experience, confidence and performance. Int Endod J 2025; 58: 1-9.
20. Cresswell-Boyes AJ, Davis GR, Baysan A. Students’ perceptions of endodontic typodont teeth with simulated canals printed from novel materials. Front Dent Med 2024; 5: 1373922.
21. Robberecht L, Chai F, Dehurtevent M, Marchandise P, Bécavin T, Hornez JC et al. A novel anatomical ceramic root canal simulator for endodontic training. Eur J Dent Educ 2017; 21: 1-6.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Endodontics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sevinc Askerbeyli Örs ^*
0000-0001-6948-6086
Türkiye

Ceren Şanap
0009-0003-0475-8003
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 12, 2025

Submission Date

July 25, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 4, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 49 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1751131

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66LZ48DA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Askerbeyli Örs, S., & Şanap, C. (2025). Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 49(3), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1751131

AMA

1.Askerbeyli Örs S, Şanap C. Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study. Clin Dent Res. 2025;49(3):150-157. doi:10.65022/clindentres.1751131

Chicago

Askerbeyli Örs, Sevinc, and Ceren Şanap. 2025. “Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study”. Clinical Dentistry and Research 49 (3): 150-57. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1751131.

EndNote

Askerbeyli Örs S, Şanap C (December 1, 2025) Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study. Clinical Dentistry and Research 49 3 150–157.

IEEE

[1]S. Askerbeyli Örs and C. Şanap, “Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study”, Clin Dent Res, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 150–157, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.65022/clindentres.1751131.

ISNAD

Askerbeyli Örs, Sevinc - Şanap, Ceren. “Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study”. Clinical Dentistry and Research 49/3 (December 1, 2025): 150-157. https://doi.org/10.65022/clindentres.1751131.

JAMA

1.Askerbeyli Örs S, Şanap C. Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study. Clin Dent Res. 2025;49:150–157.

MLA

Askerbeyli Örs, Sevinc, and Ceren Şanap. “Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study”. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol. 49, no. 3, Dec. 2025, pp. 150-7, doi:10.65022/clindentres.1751131.

Vancouver

1.Sevinc Askerbeyli Örs, Ceren Şanap. Evaluation of 3D-Printed Endodontic Training Models in Preclinical Dental Education: A Student-Based Comparative Study. Clin Dent Res. 2025 Dec. 1;49(3):150-7. doi:10.65022/clindentres.1751131