21st-Century Skills and Lateral Thinking Dispositions of Nursing Students: An Example Global Pandemic

Year 2023, , 410 - 417, 15.06.2023

Niran Çoban , Sonay Göktaş , Elif Gezginci , Merdiye Şendir

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1067963

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the 21st-century skills and lateral thinking dispositions of nursing students during the pandemic process. Speed of technological changes accesses the highest level in the current century. Following the technology and usability rate is going down among the world population. The ability of new technology usage created a new social class in society. This differentiation
positively or negatively affects the social and economic status of modern human thinking ability, creativity, and life quality. Especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, the ability of current technology usage made a big difference among people to access information and education.
Methods: This cross-sectional study is descriptive and relational. The research was conducted with 409 students studying at the Faculty of Nursing of a state university in Istanbul, Turkey.
Individual Characteristics Questionnaire, Multidimensional 21st Century Skills Scale, and Lateral Thinking Disposition Scale were used to obtain research data. The data obtained were analysed by number, descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: The results showed that nursing students were able to improve lateral thinking during pandemic. The male students have a significantly higher advantage of using technology compared with female students (p<0.05). We must emphasise that the economy of students also affects their lateral thinking ability (p<0.05).
Conclusion: In this century, many changes and transformations are taking place in health care systems in parallel with technological developments. It is necessary that we must educate nurses who can contribute to the changes and transformations and adapt to innovations. To educate new generation innovative nurses we must adapt our education programs together with the academic staff. It is necessary that must
educate nurses who can contribute to the changes and transformations and adapt to innovations. To educate new generation innovative nurses
we must adapt our education programs together with the academic staff.

Keywords

COVID-19, students, nursing, thinking, problem solving

References

• Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. JAMA 2020; 323(13):1245–1233. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648
• World Health Organization (WHO). Q&As on COVID-19 and related health topics. Published [12 May 2020]. Accessed [20 February 2021]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-andanswers-hub
• Council of Higher Education (CoHE) (2020a). Press briefing. Published [18 March 2020]. Accessed [20 February 2021]. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/universitelerde-uygulanacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-aciklama.aspx
• Brown P, Lauder H, Ashton D. Education, globalisation and the knowledge economy. 2008; 5-24. Accessed [22 February 2021]. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/25532/1/globalisationcomm.pdf
• Dupuis RE, Perskey AK. Instructional design and assessment use of case-based learning in a clinical pharmacokinetics course. AJPE 2008;72(2):1–7. DOI: 10.5688/aj720229
• McLoughlin C, Lee MJW. The three p's of pedagogy for the networked society: personalisation, participation, and productivity. IJTLHE 2008;20(1):10–27.
• Gewertz C. States press ahead on 21st century skills. Ed Week 2008; 28(8): 21–23.
• Rotherham A, Willingham D. 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. ASCD 2009;67(1):16–21.
• Cevik M, Senturk C. Multidimensional 21st century skills scale: Validity and reliability study. CJES 2019; 14(1):11-28. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v14i1.3506
• Varis T. New technologies and innovation in higher education and regional development. RUSC 2007; 4(11):16–24. DOI: 10.7238/rusc.v4i2.309
• Dogan Merih Y. Roadmap of Innovative Nurses. 1th ed. Istanbul: Nobel Tip Kitabevleri; 2018.
• De Bono D. Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity. London: Penguin Books; 1990.
• Semerci C. Developing a lateral thinking disposition (LATD) scale: A validity and reliability study. EKU 2016; 12(1): 358-371.
• Falcó Pegueroles A, Rodríguez‐Martín D, Ramos‐Pozón S, Zuriguel‐Pérez E. Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue. Nurs Philos 2021; 22(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1111/nup.12332
• Lawrence ASA, Xavier SA. Lateral thinking of prospective teachers. ERIC 2013; 1(1): 28-32.
• Yazgan AD. Investigation of the relationship between pre-service teachers lateral thinking levels and problem solving skills. JTES 2021; 14(1):20-37. DOI: 10.30831/akukeg.793247
• Yoo H. To-resource: Use of technology to support 21st century skills in a performing ensemble program. Update Univ S C Dep Music 2021; 39(2):10-14.
• Turner K, Rakkwamsuk S, Leungratanamart L. The perception on 21st century skills of nursing ınstructors and nursing students at Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Chonburi. IJNHS 2016; 10(6):1935-1938.
• Bozkurt F. Evaluation of social studies teacher training program in terms of 21st century skills. PUJE 2020; 51:1-30. DOI:10.9779/pauefd.688622
• Ozden Ozdemir D, Karakus Taysi E, Kilic Sahin H, Demir Kaya S, Bayram FO. Pre-service teachers' perceived efficacy beliefs towards the 21st century skills: The case of Kutahya. Turkish Studies 2018; 13(27):1163-1184. DOI: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.14928
• Kozikoglu I, Altunova N. The predictive power of prospective teacher’s self-efficacy perceptions of 21st century skills for their lifelong learning tendencies. JHES 2018; 8(3):522- 531. DOI: 10.5961/jhes.2018.293
• Zeybek G. Determination of level of 21st century learner skills use of high school students. IJSSER 2019; 5(2):2149-5939. DOI: 10.24289/ijsser.505263
• Yildiz K, Yilmaz B. The relationship between critical and lateral thinking dispositions of classroom teacher candidates. AIBUEFD 2014; 20(1):335-353. DOI: 10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.52925-578949
• Pehlivan KB. A study on perception of communication skills of preservice teachers. EEO 2005; 4(2):17-23.
• Gencel IE, Guzel CD. Investigation of critical thinking tendency and reflective thinking levels of teachers candidates. IJOCIS 2014; 4(8):55-68.
• Karagoz B. An evaluation of pre-service Turkish teachers lateral thinking dispositions with regard to different variables. EJES 2019; 5(9):156-164. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2542955
• Kong SL. Critical thinking dispositions of pre-service teachers in Singapore: A preliminary ınvestigation. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE). 3-6 December 2001. Fremantle, Western Australia. Accessed [11 March 2021]. https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/11504/1/AARE-2001-KongSL.pdf
• Ulukoy M, Demireli C. Gender effect on entrepreneurshıp profile: a comparative analysis of male and female entrepreneurship. JMER 2014; 12(22):47-55.
• Semerci N. Pedagogical formation students’ dispositions toward lateral thinking. BUEFAD 2017; 6(1):336-345. DOI: 10.14686/buefad.293271