Turkish Adaptation of Patient Nurse Trust Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Year 2023, , 638 - 644, 11.09.2023

Gülten Okuroğlu , Dilek Coşkuner Potur , Füsun Afşar

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1180688

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to adapt the Patient-Nurse Trust Scale to Turkish and perform validity and reliability analyses.
Methods: This study has been conducted as methodological. It was conducted between February 2021 and June 2021 in a training and research hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. The study was completed with 311 participants. Introductory Information Form, Patient-Nurse Trust Scale, and Trust in Nurses Scale were used for data collection. In addition to descriptive statistics, language validity, content validity, construct validity, criterionrelated validity, discrimination, internal consistency reliability, two-half test reliability, and item analysis methods were used to determine the scale’s psychometric properties.
Results: As a result of factor analysis, it was determined that the scale showed a single factor structure, and explained 66.63% of the total variance. Item factor load values were found to vary between .74 and .88. The ratio of the chi-square value to the degrees of freedom (397.496/112) was found to be 3.549. It was found that RMSEA= .09, GFI= .86, IFI= .93, NFI= .91, CFI= .93, and RFI= .87. It was found that the correlations of all items varied between .71 and .87. The Chronbach’s alpha value for the whole scale was calculated as .97. As a result of parallel test analysis, it was determined that there was a significant positive correlation between both scales (r= .301; p= .000).
Conclusion: The exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis results of the Turkish version of the scale are acceptable, and their reliability indexes are high.

Keywords

Trust, communication, patient-nurse relationship, validity, reliability

References

• Ozaras G, Abaan S. Investigation of the trust status of the nurse–patient relationship. Nurs Ethics 2018; 25(5):628-639. DOI: 10.1177/0969733016664971
• Carter MA. Trust, power, and vulnerability: a discourse on helping in nursing. Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;44(4):393–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.012
• Dinç L, Gastmans C. Trust in nurse-patient relationships: A literature review. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(5):501–516. DOI: 10.1177/0969733012468463
• Dinç L, Gastmans C. Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: An argument-based literature review. Nursing Inquiry 2012;19(3):223–237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00582.x
• Noro I, Roter DL, Kurosawa S, Miura Y, Ishizaki M. The impact of gender on medical visit communication and patient satis faction within the Japanese primary care context. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(2):227–232. DOI: 10.1016/j. pec.2017.08.001
• Zha P, Qureshi R, Sickora C, Porter S, Chase S, Chao YY. Development of a patient-nurse trust scale in underserved community setting. J Community Health Nurs. 2020;37(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1080/07370016.2020.1693093
• Price B. Developing patient rapport, trust and therapeutic relationships. Nursing Standard 2017;31(50). DOI: 10.7748/ns.2017.e10909
• Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Ball J, Bruyneel L, Rafferty AM, Griffiths P. Patient satisfaction with hospital care and nurses in England: An observational study. BMJ Open 2018;8(1):e019189. DOI: 10.1136/bmjop en-2017-019189
• Lotfi M, Zamanzadeh V, Valizadeh L, Khajehgoodari M. Assessment of nurse–patient communication and patient satisfaction from nursing care. Nursing Open 2019;6(3):1189-1196. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.316
• Price B. Developing patient rapport, trust and therapeutic relationships. Nursing Standard 2017;31(50):52-63. DOI: 10.7748/ns.2017.e10909
• Gómez Martín C, García Morato RA, de los Reyes Cortés N, Fernández-Cañamaque JL, Holguín P. Patient satisfaction in a Spanish burn unit. Burns 2018;45(2):341–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.03.015
• Polansky M. Building trust in home healthcare. Nursing 2020. 2019;49(10):16-17. DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000580700.09898.05
• Leslie JL, Lonneman W. Promoting in the registered nurse-patient relationship. Home Health Now 2016;34(1):38–42. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000322
• Robinson CA. Trust, health care relationships, and chronic illness: A theoretical coalescence. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016;3:2333393616664823. DOI: 10.1177/2333393616664823
• Kim SS, Chung Y, Perry MJ, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV. Association between interpersonal trust, reciprocity, and depression in South Korea: A prospective analysis. PloS One 2012;7(1):e30602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030602
• Radwin LE, Cabral HJ. Trust in nurses scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(3):683–689. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x
• Ay S, Yücel ŞÇ. Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the trust in nurses scale. J Soc Behav Pers. 2013;41(10):1737-1746. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2013.41.10.1737
• Carpenter S. Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Commun Methods Meas. 2018;12(1):25-44. DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
• Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
• Seçer I. Psychological test development and adaptation process. (2nd ed.). Ankara: Anı; 2018.
• Büyüköztürk Ş. Data analysis handbook for social sciences (28th ed.). Ankara: Pegem; 2020.
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods. 2008;6(1):53-60.
• Kartal M, Bardakçı S. SPSS ve AMOS Reliability and validity analysis with practical examples. Ankara: Akademisyen; 2018.