Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Postoperative Fatigue Scale

Year 2023, , 652 - 657, 11.09.2023

Funda Çetinkaya , Kevser Sevgi Ünal Aslan

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1185518

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative fatigue is an undesired and discouraging symptom that many patients experience after the surgery operation. Good assessment is essential to detect and manage this symptom. There is no specific Turkish validity and reliability measurement tool to assess postoperative fatigue. In this study, it was conducted to adapt the Postoperative Fatigue Scale (PO-FS) to Turkish in order to evaluate postoperative fatigue.
Methods: Methodological study method was applied. This study was conducted with a total of 276 patients. The data of the study were collected using the personal information form, PO-FS and Visual Analog Scale-Fatigue in April-July 2019.
Results: PO-FS sub-scales fatigue, vigor, and daily life activities have Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.873, 0.898, and 0.815, respectively. The factorial analysis revealed that three factors explain 76.344% of the total variance. These findings suggest that Turkish version of PO-FS is a valid and reliable scale.
Conclusion: PO-FS’s Turkish translation is valid and can be reliably used for determining the postoperative fatigue of patients.

Keywords

Postoperative fatigue, reliability, validity

References

• Yu J, Zhuang CL, Shao SJ, Liu S, Chen WZ, Chen BC, Shen X, Yu Z. Risk factors for postoperative fatigue after gastrointestinal surgery. Journal of Surgical Research 2015;194:114-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.041
• McGuire J, Ross GL, Price H, Mortensen N, Evans J, Castell LM. Biochemical markers for post-operative fatigue after major surgery. Brain Research Bulletin 2003;60: 125-130. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-9230(03)00021-2
• Barnason S, Zimmernan L, Nieveen J, Schulz P, Miller C, Hertzog M, Rasmussen D. Relationships between fatigue and early postoperative recovery outcomes over time in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart & Lung 2008; 37(4):245-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.09.003
• Zargar-Shoshtari K, Hill AG. Postoperative fatigue: A review, World J. Surg. 2009; 33: 738-745. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9906-0
• Nøstdahl T, Bernklev T, Raede J, Sandvik L, Fredheim O. Postoperative fatigue; translation and validation of a revised 10-item short form of the Identity-Consequence Fatigue Scale (ICFS). Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2016;84:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.002
• Abdelmalak BB, You J, Kurz A, Kot M, Bralliar T, Remzi FH, Sessler DI. The effects of dexamethasone, light anesthesia, and tight glucose control on postoperative fatigue and quality of life after major noncardiac surgery: A randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2019;55:83-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.038
• Kaya S, Şenturan L. The investigation of fatigue of the patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass graft surgery. JAREN. 2016; 2(2):59-67. DOI: 10.5222/jaren.2016.059
• Argon A, Onat H. Cancer fatigue, approach to cancer patient. Ed: Onat H, Mandel NM. Istanbul: Nobel Printing 2002.
• Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V. Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet 2003; 362(9384):640-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14186-4.
• Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J. Psychosom. Res. 2004;56:157-170. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00371-4.
• Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP. Development of a fatigue scale. J. Psychosom. Res. 1993;37(2):147-153. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-p.
• Paddison JS, Booth RJ, Hill AG, Cameron LD. Comprehensive assessment of perioperative fatigue: Development of the identity-consequence fatigue scale, J. Psychosom. Res. 2006;60:615-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.08.008
• Arslan S, Öztunç G. Validity and reliability of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma fatigue scale. Journal of Research and Development in Nursing 2013; 15(1):48-60.
• Can AG, Can SS. Validation of the Turkish version of the fatigue severity scale in patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatology International. 2012;32:27-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-010-1558-3
• Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17(1): 45-56. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4
• Tseng BY, Gajewski BJ, Kluding PM. Reliability, responsiveness, and validity of the visual analog fatigue scale to measure exertion fatigue in people with chronic stroke: A preliminary study. Stroke Research and Treatment 2010;2010:412964. DOI: 10.4061/2010/412964.
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Vet HCW. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–549. DOI 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
• Yurdugul H. Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliliği için kapsam geçerlilik endekslerinin kullanılması. In: XIV Educational Sciences Congress; Denizli, Turkiye; 2005 (Turkish).
• Alpar R. Spor sağlik ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle uygulamali istatistik ve geçerlik – güvenirlik. Ankara, Turkiye: Detay Yayıncılık, 2010. (Turkish)
• Gjersing L., Caplehom RM., Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2010,10:13.
• Polit DF, Beck C. In essentials of nursing research methods, appraisal, and utilization 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2005, p. 597–607.
• Karasar N. Araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Türkiye: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık; 2014. (Turkish)
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
• Aksayan S, Gözüm S. A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale. J Nurs Res Dev 2002;4(1):9e14.
• Karagöz Y. SPSS and AMOS 23 Uygulamalı istatistiksel analiz.Nobel Yayıncılık Ankara. 2016. (Turkish)
• Akgül A, Çelik O. İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri. Emek Yayıncılık. Ankara 2005. (Turkish)
• Conway JM, Huffcutt AI. A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 2003;6(2):147-168. DOI: 10.1177/1094428103251541
• Çapık C. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2014;17(3):196-205.
• Bardakçı S. The Validity and reliability study of the scale of the perceived sociability of online learning environments. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences 2010;43(1):17-39. DOI: 10.1501/Egifak_0000001189
• Kline RB. Practice of principles of structural equation modeling. (4th Edn.) New York: Guilford 2016.