Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials

Year 2024, , 120 - 125, 28.03.2024

Zeynep Arıkan , Zeliha Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh , Yılmaz Umut Aslan , Yasemin Özkan

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440

Abstract

Objective: Novel strength-gradient monolithic zirconia is a developed material recently introduced to the market and its mechanical properties should be investigated in vitro. The aim of the study is to compare the wear rates of three different CAD/CAM materials with a chewing simulator after one year of dynamic loading.
Methods: 7x7x3 mm discs were prepared from lithium disilicate, strength-gradient monolithic zirconia, and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic. Both groups were divided into two subgroups (n=12) as glazed and mechanically polished.
The samples were scanned with a laser scanner device (SD Mechatronic Laser Scanner LAS-20, Westerham, Germany) to determine the amount of wear. The samples were placed in a chewing simulator (SD Mechatronic Chewing Simulator CS-4.2, Westerham, Germany) for 240 000 cycles which is equivalent to 1 year of clinical use. After the dynamic loading in the chewing simulator, the samples were scanned again in the laser scanner, and the data was obtained. Kruskal Wallis test was used to analyze the data.
Results: The amount of wear of each material was found to be statistically significant (p< .05). No significant differences between the polished and glazed groups of Zir and LD were found but glazed CD was significantly more wear-resistant than polished CD (p< .05).
Conclusions: Wear is a phenomenon that can be affected by different factors such as microstructure and surface finishing of the materials. Wear resistance should be taken into consideration when choosing a material.

Keywords

Strength-gradient monolithic zirconia zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate lithium disilicate wear

References

  • Çakmak G, Subaşı MG, Sert M, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments on wear and surface properties of different CAD-CAM materials and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;S0022-3913(21)00340-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.023.
  • Wiedenmann F, Böhm D, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B. Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(9):3049-3060. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8.
  • D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Pirani M, Vadini M, Gattone M, De Angelis F. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):612-618. DOI: 10.2341/13-108-L.
  • Wille S, Sieper K, Kern M. Wear resistance of crowns made from different CAM/CAD materials. Dent Mater. 2021;37(7):e407-e413. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.017
  • Ludovichetti FS, Trindade FZ, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ, Fonseca RG. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):318.e1-318.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.011
  • Blackburn C, Rask H, Awada A. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD-CAM materials after accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(6):954-958. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.016.
  • Mehl C, Harder S, Byrne A, Kern M. Prosthodontics in digital times: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(1):29-36. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a28744.
  • Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016;32(7):908-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013.
  • Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, Serafini N, Perfetti G, Trisi P, Caputi S. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(5):748-55. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-041.
  • Zhang F, Spies BC, Vleugels J, Reveron H, Wesemann C, Müller WD, van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly. Dent Mater. 2019;35(12):1776-1790. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.009.
  • Tribst JPM, Alves LMM, Piva AMOD, Melo RM, Borges ALS, Paes-Junior TJA, Bottino MA. Reinforced Glass-ceramics: Parametric Inspection of Three-Dimensional Wear and Volumetric Loss after Chewing Simulation. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):505-510. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902699.
  • Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus, and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):e275-e283. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222.
  • Schönhoff LM, Lümkemann N, Buser R, Hampe R, Stawarczyk B. Fatigue resistance of monolithic strength-gradient zirconia materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;119:104504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104504.
  • Kolakarnprasert N, Kaizer MR, Kim DK, Zhang Y. New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure, and translucency. Dent Mater. 2019;35(5):797-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.017
  • Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):140-147. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517737483.
  • Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):369-380. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a38057.
  • Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):441-450. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a38157.
  • Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.375.
  • Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0.
  • Incesu E, Yanikoglu N. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(1):100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003.
  • De Angelis F, D'Arcangelo C, Malíšková N, Vanini L, Vadini M. Wear Properties of Different Additive Restorative Materials Used for Onlay/Overlay Posterior Restorations. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):E156-E166. DOI: 10.2341/19-115-L.
  • Ozkir SE, Bicer M, Deste G, Karakus E, Yilmaz B. Wear of monolithic zirconia against different CAD-CAM and indirect restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3):505-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.023.
  • Yilmaz EÇ. Investigation of two-body wear behavior of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic for biomedical applications; in vitro chewing simulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020;30:1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1852555.
  • Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):725-737. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3.
  • Zierden K, Acar J, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Wear and Fracture Strength of New Ceramic Resins for Chairside Milling. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(1):74-76. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5492.
  • Aladağ A, Oğuz D, Çömlekoğlu ME, Akan E. In vivo wear determination of novel CAD/CAM ceramic crowns by using 3D alignment. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(2):120-127. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.120.
  • Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Strasser T. Fatigue and wear behaviour of zirconia materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103970.
  • Borrero-Lopez O, Guiberteau F, Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Wear of ceramic-based dental materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;92:144-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.009.
  • Zurek AD, Alfaro MF, Wee AG, Yuan JC, Barao VA, Mathew MT, Sukotjo C. Wear Characteristics and Volume Loss of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e510-e518. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12782.
  • Nakashima J, Taira Y, Sawase T. In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):295-300. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12272.
  • Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3.
  • Jitwirachot K, Rungsiyakull P, Holloway JA, Jia-Mahasap W. Wear Behavior of Different Generations of Zirconia: Present Literature. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:9341616. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9341616.
  • Selvaraj U, Koli DK, Jain V, Nanda A. Evaluation of the wear of glazed and polished zirconia crowns and the opposing natural teeth: A clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(1):52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.007.
  • Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(5):393-405. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a29151.
  • Badarneh A, Eun Choi JJ, Lyons K, Porter G, Waddell N, Chun Li K. The effect of aging on the wear performance of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2022;38(5):e136-e146. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.018.
  • Kontos L, Schille C, Schweizer E, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Influence of surface treatment on the wear of solid zirconia. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71(3-4):482-7. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.696690.
  • Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, Linke B, Flores-Mir C, Nychka JA. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(8):593-601. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12167.
  • Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22(8):712-734. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002.
  • Alves LMM, Contreras LPC, Bueno MG, Campos TMB, Bresciani E, Valera MC, Melo RM. The Wear Performance of Glazed and Polished Full Contour Zirconia. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):511-518. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902801.
  • Vardhaman S, Borba M, Kaizer MR, Kim D, Zhang Y. Wear behavior and microstructural characterization of translucent multilayer zirconia. Dent Mater. 2020;36(11):1407-1417. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.015.
  • Daryakenari G, Alaghehmand H, Bijani A. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Surface Roughness and Wear of Machinable Ceramics and Opposing Dental Enamel. Oper Dent. 2019;44(1):88-95. DOI: 10.2341/17-153-L.
  • Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing, and glazing. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1586-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008.
  • Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24(4):433-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016.
  • Ghazal M, Kern M. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(5):342-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60068-8.
  • Dupriez ND, von Koeckritz AK, Kunzelmann KH. A comparative study of sliding wear of nonmetallic dental restorative materials with emphasis on micromechanical wear mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103(4):925-34. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33193.

Year 2024, , 120 - 125, 28.03.2024

Zeynep Arıkan , Zeliha Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh , Yılmaz Umut Aslan , Yasemin Özkan

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440

Abstract

Keywords

Strength-gradient monolithic zirconia zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate lithium disilicate wear

References

  • Çakmak G, Subaşı MG, Sert M, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments on wear and surface properties of different CAD-CAM materials and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;S0022-3913(21)00340-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.023.
  • Wiedenmann F, Böhm D, Eichberger M, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B. Influence of different surface treatments on two-body wear and fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM ceramics. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(9):3049-3060. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03173-8.
  • D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Pirani M, Vadini M, Gattone M, De Angelis F. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):612-618. DOI: 10.2341/13-108-L.
  • Wille S, Sieper K, Kern M. Wear resistance of crowns made from different CAM/CAD materials. Dent Mater. 2021;37(7):e407-e413. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.017
  • Ludovichetti FS, Trindade FZ, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ, Fonseca RG. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):318.e1-318.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.011
  • Blackburn C, Rask H, Awada A. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD-CAM materials after accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(6):954-958. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.016.
  • Mehl C, Harder S, Byrne A, Kern M. Prosthodontics in digital times: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(1):29-36. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a28744.
  • Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016;32(7):908-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013.
  • Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, Serafini N, Perfetti G, Trisi P, Caputi S. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(5):748-55. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2016-041.
  • Zhang F, Spies BC, Vleugels J, Reveron H, Wesemann C, Müller WD, van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly. Dent Mater. 2019;35(12):1776-1790. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.009.
  • Tribst JPM, Alves LMM, Piva AMOD, Melo RM, Borges ALS, Paes-Junior TJA, Bottino MA. Reinforced Glass-ceramics: Parametric Inspection of Three-Dimensional Wear and Volumetric Loss after Chewing Simulation. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):505-510. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902699.
  • Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus, and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):e275-e283. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222.
  • Schönhoff LM, Lümkemann N, Buser R, Hampe R, Stawarczyk B. Fatigue resistance of monolithic strength-gradient zirconia materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;119:104504. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104504.
  • Kolakarnprasert N, Kaizer MR, Kim DK, Zhang Y. New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure, and translucency. Dent Mater. 2019;35(5):797-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.017
  • Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):140-147. DOI: 10.1177/0022034517737483.
  • Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):369-380. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a38057.
  • Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):441-450. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a38157.
  • Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1195-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.375.
  • Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0.
  • Incesu E, Yanikoglu N. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(1):100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003.
  • De Angelis F, D'Arcangelo C, Malíšková N, Vanini L, Vadini M. Wear Properties of Different Additive Restorative Materials Used for Onlay/Overlay Posterior Restorations. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):E156-E166. DOI: 10.2341/19-115-L.
  • Ozkir SE, Bicer M, Deste G, Karakus E, Yilmaz B. Wear of monolithic zirconia against different CAD-CAM and indirect restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3):505-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.023.
  • Yilmaz EÇ. Investigation of two-body wear behavior of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic for biomedical applications; in vitro chewing simulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020;30:1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1852555.
  • Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):725-737. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2473-3.
  • Zierden K, Acar J, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Wear and Fracture Strength of New Ceramic Resins for Chairside Milling. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(1):74-76. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5492.
  • Aladağ A, Oğuz D, Çömlekoğlu ME, Akan E. In vivo wear determination of novel CAD/CAM ceramic crowns by using 3D alignment. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(2):120-127. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.120.
  • Rosentritt M, Preis V, Behr M, Strasser T. Fatigue and wear behaviour of zirconia materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103970.
  • Borrero-Lopez O, Guiberteau F, Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Wear of ceramic-based dental materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;92:144-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.009.
  • Zurek AD, Alfaro MF, Wee AG, Yuan JC, Barao VA, Mathew MT, Sukotjo C. Wear Characteristics and Volume Loss of CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e510-e518. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12782.
  • Nakashima J, Taira Y, Sawase T. In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):295-300. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12272.
  • Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(2):105-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3.
  • Jitwirachot K, Rungsiyakull P, Holloway JA, Jia-Mahasap W. Wear Behavior of Different Generations of Zirconia: Present Literature. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:9341616. DOI: 10.1155/2022/9341616.
  • Selvaraj U, Koli DK, Jain V, Nanda A. Evaluation of the wear of glazed and polished zirconia crowns and the opposing natural teeth: A clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(1):52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.007.
  • Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(5):393-405. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a29151.
  • Badarneh A, Eun Choi JJ, Lyons K, Porter G, Waddell N, Chun Li K. The effect of aging on the wear performance of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2022;38(5):e136-e146. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.04.018.
  • Kontos L, Schille C, Schweizer E, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Influence of surface treatment on the wear of solid zirconia. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71(3-4):482-7. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.696690.
  • Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, Linke B, Flores-Mir C, Nychka JA. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(8):593-601. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12167.
  • Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006;22(8):712-734. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002.
  • Alves LMM, Contreras LPC, Bueno MG, Campos TMB, Bresciani E, Valera MC, Melo RM. The Wear Performance of Glazed and Polished Full Contour Zirconia. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(5):511-518. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201902801.
  • Vardhaman S, Borba M, Kaizer MR, Kim D, Zhang Y. Wear behavior and microstructural characterization of translucent multilayer zirconia. Dent Mater. 2020;36(11):1407-1417. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.015.
  • Daryakenari G, Alaghehmand H, Bijani A. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Surface Roughness and Wear of Machinable Ceramics and Opposing Dental Enamel. Oper Dent. 2019;44(1):88-95. DOI: 10.2341/17-153-L.
  • Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing, and glazing. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1586-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008.
  • Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24(4):433-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016.
  • Ghazal M, Kern M. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(5):342-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60068-8.
  • Dupriez ND, von Koeckritz AK, Kunzelmann KH. A comparative study of sliding wear of nonmetallic dental restorative materials with emphasis on micromechanical wear mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103(4):925-34. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33193.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Prosthodontics
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zeynep Arıkan 0000-0002-5759-3519

Zeliha Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh 0000-0001-8688-1758

Yılmaz Umut Aslan 0000-0003-0500-7546

Yasemin Özkan 0000-0002-4699-638X

Early Pub Date March 23, 2024
Publication Date March 28, 2024
Submission Date January 11, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Arıkan, Z., Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh, Z., Aslan, Y. U., Özkan, Y. (2024). Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 14(1), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440
AMA Arıkan Z, Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh Z, Aslan YU, Özkan Y. Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. March 2024;14(1):120-125. doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440
Chicago Arıkan, Zeynep, Zeliha Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh, Yılmaz Umut Aslan, and Yasemin Özkan. “Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia With Two Different CAD/CAM Materials”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 14, no. 1 (March 2024): 120-25. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440.
EndNote Arıkan Z, Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh Z, Aslan YU, Özkan Y (March 1, 2024) Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 14 1 120–125.
IEEE Z. Arıkan, Z. Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh, Y. U. Aslan, and Y. Özkan, “Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 120–125, 2024, doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440.
ISNAD Arıkan, Zeynep et al. “Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia With Two Different CAD/CAM Materials”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 14/1 (March 2024), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440.
JAMA Arıkan Z, Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh Z, Aslan YU, Özkan Y. Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2024;14:120–125.
MLA Arıkan, Zeynep et al. “Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia With Two Different CAD/CAM Materials”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, pp. 120-5, doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1232440.
Vancouver Arıkan Z, Şanıvar Abbasgholızadeh Z, Aslan YU, Özkan Y. Comparison of Two Body Wear Resistance of Novel Strength- Gradient Monolithic Zirconia with Two Different CAD/CAM Materials. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2024;14(1):120-5.

14639   14640