Examining the Relationships Between Adolescents' Emotion Regulation Levels and Social Media Addiction

Year 2022, , 564 - 569, 28.09.2022

Adem Peker , Melike Nebioğlu Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.869465

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the relationship between adolescents’ emotional regulation strategies and social media addiction.

Methods: 1151 adolescents aged between 14 and 18 participated in the study (Mage = 14.44, SD =4.97). 63.8% of the participants in the study were girls and 36.2% were male. Researchers used the Emotion Regulation Scale and the Social Media Addiction Scale. In the study, we performed correlation analysis to determine the relationships between the variables. We used the structural equation model to test the predictive relationship between emotion regulation on social media addiction. We used SPSS 22, LISREL 9.1 program for statistical analysis.

Results: The results show that there are low-level, negative correlations between social media addiction and reappraisal of emotions. Similarly, there are low-level, positively significant relationships between suppression of emotions and social media addiction. Another result of the study reveals that reappraisal and suppression of emotions have a predictive effect on social media addiction.

Conclusion: The results show that reappraisal emotions reduce social media addiction, while suppression increases social media addiction.

Keywords

Emotion regulation, social media addiction, adolescents

References

• [1] Tzavela EC, Karakitsou C, Dreier M. et al., Processes discriminating adaptive and maladaptive Internet use among European adolescents highly engaged online. Jour. Adol. 2015; 40: 34-47.
• [2] Reiner I, Tibubos AN, Hardt J, M¨uller KW, Wölfling KW, Beutel ME. Peer attachment, specific patterns of internet use and problematic internet use in male and female adolescents. Eur. Ch. Adol. Psych. 2017; 26(10): 1257-1268.
• [3] Griffiths MD, Szabo A. Is excessive online usage a function of medium or activity? An empirical pilot study. J. Behav. Addict, 2014; 3:74-77.
• [4] Unlü F. Social media addiction and social isolation in middle age individuals. PESA Intern. Journ. Soc. Res. 2018; 4(1): 161- 172.
• [5] Deniz L, Gürültü E. High school students’ social media addiction. Kast. Educ. Jour. 2018; 26(2): 355-467.
• [6] Paul LL, Lee SN. Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Soc. Scie. Comp. Rev. 2012; 30(4): 403-418.
• [7] Güney M, Tastepe T. Social media usage and social media addiction in adolescent. Journ. Ank. Hea Sci. 2020; 9(2): 183-190. doi: https://www.doi.org/10.46971
• [8] Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychoph. 2002; 39 (3): 281-291.
• [9] Gross JJ, Richards JM, John OP. Emotion regulation in everyday life, in Emotion Regulation in Families: Pathways to Dysfunction and Health, D. K. Snyder, J. A. Simpson, and J. N. Hughes, Eds., pp. 13-35, American Psychological Association, 2006; Washington, DC, USA.
• [10] Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties. J. Psych. Behav. Assess. 2004; 26: 41-54.
• [11] Chong WH, Chye S, Huan VS, Ang RP. Computers in Human Behavior Generalized problematic Internet use and regulation of social emotional competence: The mediating role of maladaptive cognitions arising from academic expectation stress on adolescents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014; 38: 151-158.
• [12] Marino C, Caselli G, Lenzi M, Monaci MG, Vieno A, Nikcnevic AV, Spada MM. Emotion regulation and desire thinking as predictors of problematic facebook use. Psych. Quart. 2019; 90: 405-411 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126.019.09628-1
• [13] Yu JJ, Kim H, Hay I. Understanding adolescents’ problematic Internet use from a social/cognitive and addiction research framework. Comp. Hum. Behav. 2013; 29(6): 2682-2689.
• [14] Caselli G, Spada MM. Metacognitions in desire thinking: A preliminary investigation. Behav. Cogn. Psych. 2010; 38(5): 629-637.
• [15] McRae K, Hughes B, Chopra S, Gabrieli JD, Gross JJ, Ochsner KN. The neural bases of distraction and reappraisal. Jou. Cogn. Neuros. 2010; 22(2): 248-262.
• [16] Ecirli H, Ogelman HG. Validity-reliability study of the scale of emotion regulation strategies for children aged five-six. Intern. Peer-Rev. Jour. Hum. Acad. Scie, 2015; 4(13): 85-100.
• [17] Southam-Gerow MA. Emotion regulation in children and adolescents: A practitioner’s guide. 2013; Guilford Press.
• [18] Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Rev. Gen. Psych., 1998; 2(3): 271-299.
• [19] John OP, Gross JJ. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Jour. Person. 2004; 72(6): 1301-1334.
• [20] Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Jou. Person. Soc. Psych. 2003; 85(2): 348-362 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
• [21] Nyklicek I, Vingerhoets A, Zeelenberg M. Emotion regulation and well-being: A view from different angles. In Emotion regulation and well-being (1-9). 2011; Springer, New York, NY
• [22] Rogier G, Velotti P. Conceptualizing gambling disorder with the process model of emotion regulation, Jour. Behav. Addict. 2018; 7(2): 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.52
• [23] Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta analytic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2010; 30(2): 217-237.
• [24] Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J, Toarmino D. et al. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. Psych. Rec., 2004; 54: 553-578
• [25] Casale S, Caplan SE, Fioravanti G. Positive metacognitions about internet use: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use. Addict. Behav. 2016; 59: 84-88.
• [26] Hormes JM, Kearns B, Timko CA. Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Add. 2014; 109(12): 2079-2088.
• [27] Ozgenel M, Canpolat O, Eksi H. Social media addiction scale for adolescents: Validity and reliability study. Addicta: Turk. Jour. Addict, 2019; 6: 629-662. doi.org/10.15805/ addicta.2019.6.3.0086
• [28] Ozgüle ETU, Sümer N. Emotion regulation and psychological adjustment in adolescence: Turkish adaptation of the emotion regulation scale. Turk. Psych. Articl., 2017; 20(40): 1-18.
• [29] Sevinc H, Tas I. The relationship between internet addiction and the need for thinking and expressing emotions in university students. Jour. Educ. Live., 2020; 34(2): 523-541.
• [30] Ercengiz M, Sar AH. The predictive role of Internet addiction in emotion regulation in adolescents. Sakar. Univ. Journ. Educ., 2017; 7(1): 183-194.
• [31] Trumello C, Babore A, Candelori C, Morelli M, Bianchi D. Relationship with parents, emotion regulation, and callous- unemotional traits in adolescents’ internet addiction. BioMed Res. Intern. 2018; 1-10. doi.org/10.1155/2018/7914261.
• [32] Satıcı B, Deniz ME. Modeling emotion regulation and subjective happiness: Smartphone addiction as a mediator. Add. 2020;7(3): 146-152.
• [33] Erdem G. Investigation of the relationship between social media use, peer relationships and emotion regulation among high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, 2019; Institute of Social Sciences, Near East University, Lefkoşa, Kıbrıs.
• [34] Marino C, Gini G, Vieno A, Spada MM. The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Aff. Disord. 2018; 226: 274-281.
• [35] Hallion LS, Steinman SA, Tolin DF, Diefenbach GJ. Psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS) and its short forms in adults with emotional disorders. Fron. Psychol. 2018; 9:539-549. doi:10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.00539.
• [36] Rozgonjuk D, Elhai JD. Emotion regulation in relation to smartphone use: Process smartphone use mediates the association between expressive suppression and problematic smartphone use. Curr. Psych. 2019; Advanced Publication Online. doi:10.1007/s12144.019.00271-4.