Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Düşük Akımlı Anestezide Salin ve Hava ile Şişirilen Endotrakeal Tüp Kaf Basınçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 112 - 117, 15.06.2018

Abstract

Amaç: Entübe hastalarda nitrik oksitli (N2 O) düşük akımlı genel anestezide
(DAA) inspire edilen nitröz oksit fraksiyonundaki (Fi N2 O) artışa bağlı olarak
N2 O’nun endotrakel tüp (ETT) kafı içine diffüzyonu kaf basınçlarında artışa
neden olur. Biz çalışmamızda N2 O’lu DAA’de hava ve salin ile şişirilen ETT
kaf basınçlarını ve bunun ameliyat sonrası dönemdeki boğaz ağrısına olan
etkisini karşılaştırdık.
Yöntemler: Çalışmaya ASA I/II toplam altmış erişkin hasta dahil ettik. Anestezi
indüksiyonu sonrası endotrakeal entübasyon yapılan hastaların ETT
kafları hava (Grup A, n=30) ve salin (Grup S, n=30) ile 25 cmH2 O olacak
şekilde şişirilerek rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Anestezi N2 O’li DAA ile sürdürüldü.
ETT kaf basınçları bir basınç manometresi ile sürekli olarak ölçüldü ve
inspire edilen oksijen ve N2 O seviyeleri operasyon boyunca her 10 dakikada
bir kaydedildi. Hastaların cerrahi sonrası 2. ve 24. saatlerde yutkunurken ve
yutkunma olmaksızın boğaz ağrıları numerical rating scala (NRS) ile değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Gruplar arasında demografik ve intraoperatif açısından anlamlı
bir fark yoktu. Tüm takip dönemlerindeki kaf basınçları Grup S ile kıyaslandı-
ğında Grup A’da maksimum olarak yüksekti (p10.dk=0,02, değer
dönemlerde p<0,0001). Grup A’da kaf basınçları ile FiN2O arasında %51,9
pozitif yönde anlamlı bir korelasyon bulundu (r=0,519, p=0,048). Grupların
yutkunma ve yutkunma olmaksızın postoperatif boğaz ağrısı skorları kıyaslandığında,
Grup A, Grup S'ye göre 2. ve 24. saatte anlamlı olarak yüksekti
(p<0,05).
Sonuç: Azotprotoksitli DAA’de ETE tüp kaflarının hava ile kıyaslandığında
salin ile şişirilmesi intraoperatif kaf basınçlarını ve cerrahi sonrası dönemde
boğaz ağrısı sıklığını azaltmıştır.

References

  • Chapman J, Pallin D, Ferrara L, Mortell S, Pliakas J, Shear M, et al. Endotracheal tube cuff pressures in patients intubated before transport. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27: 980-2

Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 112 - 117, 15.06.2018

Abstract

Objective: Depending on the increase in inspired fractionated nitric oxide

fraction (FiN2O), cuff pressures in intubated patients are increased with diffusion

into endotracheal cuff during low-flow anesthesia (LFA) with nitrous

oxide (N2O). We compared pressures of air- and saline-inflated endotracheal

tube cuffs during LFA with N2O in our study.

Methods: We included 60 adult patients who were classified by the American

Society of Anesthesiologists as I/II in the study. After induction of anesthesia,

endotracheal cuffs of patients who were intubated were inflated

with air (Group A=30) and saline (Group S=30) to 25 cm water. Thus, two

equal randomized groups were separated. The anesthesia technique was

maintained with LFA and N2O. Endotracheal cuff pressures were continuously

measured with a pressure manometer, and inspired oxygen and N2O

levels and also 2 and 24 h after surgery for sore throat were recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference about demographic and intraoperative

data between the groups. Cuff pressures were significantly higher

in Group A than in Group S during all periods (p10 min=0.02, p<0.0001

for others). Group S had significantly higher values than Group A when

maximum cuff pressures were compared (37.60±3.16 vs. 29.96±3.34, respectively;

p<0.0001). There was a 51.9% positive correlation between cuff

pressure and FiN2O in Group A (r=0.519, p=0.048). Group Ahad significantly

higher level than Group S at postoperative 2 and 24 h when groups were

compared for postoperative sore throat without swallowing and swallowing

(p<0.05).

Conclusion: Under LFA with N2O, endotracheal cuff pressures during operation

and postoperative sore throat incidences in our study were significantly

higher in Group S than in Group A.

References

  • Chapman J, Pallin D, Ferrara L, Mortell S, Pliakas J, Shear M, et al. Endotracheal tube cuff pressures in patients intubated before transport. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27: 980-2
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ahmet Beşir This is me

Gülşah Erdoğan This is me

Publication Date June 15, 2018
Submission Date September 27, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Beşir, A., & Erdoğan, G. (2018). Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8(2), 112-117.
AMA Beşir A, Erdoğan G. Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. June 2018;8(2):112-117.
Chicago Beşir, Ahmet, and Gülşah Erdoğan. “Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated With Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8, no. 2 (June 2018): 112-17.
EndNote Beşir A, Erdoğan G (June 1, 2018) Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8 2 112–117.
IEEE A. Beşir and G. Erdoğan, “Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–117, 2018.
ISNAD Beşir, Ahmet - Erdoğan, Gülşah. “Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated With Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8/2 (June 2018), 112-117.
JAMA Beşir A, Erdoğan G. Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018;8:112–117.
MLA Beşir, Ahmet and Gülşah Erdoğan. “Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated With Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, 2018, pp. 112-7.
Vancouver Beşir A, Erdoğan G. Comparison Between Cuff Pressures of Endotracheal Tubes Inflated with Saline or Air in Low-Flow Anesthesia. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018;8(2):112-7.

14639   14640