Color Stability of Flowable Composites in Different Viscosities

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 454 - 461, 30.12.2020

Bora Korkut Cigdem Hacıalı

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.816231

Cited By: 11

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study was aimed to evaluate the color stability of resin-based composite materials in different viscosities immersed in various colorant solutions.

Methods: 250 composite samples of A2 shades were prepared using two high-viscosity flowable composites (G-aenial Injectable, GC, Tokyo, Japan; Estelite Super Low Flow, Tokuyama Dental, Japan A2 shade), a bulk-fill flowable composite (Filtek Bulk-Fill, 3M, USA), a low-viscosity flowable composite (Filtek Ultimate Flowable, 3M, USA), and a packable composite (Filtek Ultimate, 3M, USA). Samples were polymerized and polished from both sides with a LED curing unit (Valo Grand, Ultradent, Switzerland) and polishing discs (SofLex, 3M, USA). Then divided by test groups (n=10 for each) regarding colorant solutions; coke (CocaCola Company, USA), tea (Yellow Label, Lipton, Rize, Turkey), coffee (Nescafe Classic; Nestle, Switzerland), red wine (Doluca, Öküzgözü, Doluca, İstanbul, Turkey), and physiologic saline as the control solution. Samples were discolored for 144 hours with solutions in an incubator at 37°C, and repolished after discoloration. Color measurements were performed using a clinical spectrophotometer (EasyShade IV, Vita, Germany) and a colorimeter (ShadeStar, Dentsply Sirona, USA). Two-way Anova test and Tukey HSD test were used for statistical analyses.

Results: Composite material and colorant solution were considered effective factors for influencing the color change, regarding after discoloration scores (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). In addition, colorant solution was found more effective than the type of composite. Filtek Ultimate Flowable presented significantly the highest level of color change among others (p<0.001), for both ‘after discoloration (5,34 ± 3,78b)’ and ‘after repolishing (3,93 ± 2,23b)’ periods. No significant difference in color change was found between Gaenial Injectable, Estelite Super Low Flow, Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, and Filtek Ultimate, and all showed imperceptible color changes (∆E*<3.7). Red wine solution showed significantly the highest level of color change (8,00 ± 2,08d) among other colorant solutions (p<0.001), and followed by coffee (4,59 ± 1,52c), tea (3,38 ± 1,21b), and coke (1,58 ± 0,99a), respectively. A strong relation was found between the spectrophotometer and colorimeter measurements.

Conclusion: Viscosity was considered an effective factor for discoloration of RBCs. Color stability of high viscosity flowable composite materials were found to be good and similar to packable composite. Samples immersed in red wine showed the greatest level of discoloration and followed by coffee, tea, and coke. The repolishing procedure was considered effective for reversing back the surface discoloration of composite materials.

Keywords

Discoloration, repolishing, flowable composite, viscosity, color stability

Project Number

-

References

• 1. Korkut B, Yanıkoğlu F, Günday M. Direct composite laminate veneers: three case reports. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2013; 7(2):105-111.
• 2. Güler AU, Duran I, Yücel AÇ, Ozkan P. Effects of air-polishing powders on color stability of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 505-510.
• 3. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - A 10 year report. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 991-1000.
• 4. Lazzetti G, Burgess JO, Gardiner D, Ripps A. Color stability of fluoride-containing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 520-525.
• 5. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 33-40.
• 6. Rajkumar K, Kumar S, Mahalaxmi S, Ragavi P, Mageshwaran TA. Colour stability of resin composites after emersing in coffee of different temperature - an in vitrostudy. SRM J Dent Sci 2011; 2: 91-95.
• 7. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 416-425.
• 8. Kocaağaoğlu H, Aslan T, Gürbulak A, Albayrak H, Taşdemir Z, Gumus H. Efficacy of polishing kits on the surface roughness and color stability of different composite resins. Niger J Clin Pract 2017; 20(5): 557-565.
• 9. Moraes RR., Goncalves LDS, Lancellotti AC, et al. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins?. Oper Dent 2009; 34(5): 551-557.
• 10. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater., 2004; 20: 530–534.
• 11. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382–1390.
• 12. Plotino G, Buono L, Grande NM, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Nonvital tooth bleaching: a review of the literature and clinical procedures. J Endod 2008; 34: 394-407.
• 13. Berger SB, Palialol ARM, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finishing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23(1): 34-43.
• 14. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 613-627.
• 15. Ölmez A, Kisbet S. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlarda bitirme ve polisaj işlemlerindeki yeni gelişmeler. Acta Odontol Turc 2013; 30(2): 115-122.
• 16. Barutcugil C , Yildiz M. Intrinsic and extrinsic discoloration of dimethacrylate and silorane based composites. J Dent 2012; 40: 57-63.
• 17. Ceci M, Viola M, Rattalino D, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Poggio C. Discoloration of different esthetic restorative materials: A spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2017; 11(2): 149-156.
• 18. O’Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. A new, small color difference equation for dental shades. J Dent Res 1990; 9(11): 1762-1764.
• 19. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptibility of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97(4): 200-208.
• 20. Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Ünlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25(6): 404-419.
• 21. Kim BJ, Lee YK. Influence of the shade designation on the color difference between the same shade-designated resin composites by the brand. Dent Mater 2009; 25(9): 1148-1154.
• 22. Zimmerli B, Koch T, Flury S, Lussi A. The Influence of Toothbrushing and Coffee Staining on Different Composite Surface Coatings. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16(2): 469-479.
• 23. Celik EU, Aladağ A, Türkün LŞ, Yilmaz G. Color changes of dental resin composites before and after polymerization and storage in water. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23(3): 179-188.
• 24. Pedroso LB, Barreto LF, Miotti LL, Nicolosoo GF, Durand LB. Effect of a surface sealant on the color stability of composite resins after immersion in staining solution. Gen Dent 2016; 64(2): 22-25.
• 25. Tekçe N, Pala K, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of surface sealant application and accelerated aging on posterior restorative surfaces: An SEM and AFM study. Dent Mater 2017; 36(2): 182-189.
• 26. Ragain JC, Jonston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Res Appl 2000; 25(4): 278-285.
• 27. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(5): 819-822.
• 28. AlShaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin- based composites: A literature review. Saudi Dent J 2017; 29: 48-58.
• 29. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int 2010; 41(8): 695-702.
• 30. Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: A Systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 18–24.
• 31. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: An in vitro study. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 353–362.
• 32. Fontes ST, Fernández MR, de Moura CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a nanofill composite: Effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 388–391.
• 33. Szesz A, Parreiras S, Martini E, Reis A, Loguercio A. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2017; 65: 11-21.
• 34. JI Rosales-Leal, RD Castillo-Salmeron, MA Molino-Serrano, H Gonzalez-Moreira, MA Cabrerizo-Vilchez. Effect of hygroscopic expansion of resin filling on interfacial gap and sealing: a confocal microscopy study, J Adhes Dent 2013; 15: 423-430.
• 35. Abiodun-Solanke I, Ajayi D, Arigbede A. Nanotechnology and its application in dentistry. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4: 171–177.
• 36. Shaalan OO, Abou-Auf E, El Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of flowable resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and noncarious lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20(6): 380-385.
• 37. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomater 2003; 24:655–665.
• 38. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent 2005; 33(5): 389-398.
• 39. Zajkani E, Abdoh Tabrizi M, Ghasemi A, Torabzade, H, Kharazifard M. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on composite resin color change. J Islam Dent Assoc 2013; 25(3): 139-146.
• 40. Llena C, Fernández S, Forner L. Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Invest 2017; 21(4): 1071-1077.
• 41. Poggio C, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Colombo M, Scribante A. Surface roughness of flowable resin composites eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. J Conserv Dent 2012; 15: 137–140.
• 42. Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95(2): 137-142.
• 43. Manabe A, Kato Y, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Komatsu M, Werner J. Discoloration of coating resin exposed to staining solutions in vitro. Dent Mater 2009; 28(3): 338-343.