Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 393 - 398, 27.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555

Abstract

References

  • 1. Rode K, Kawano Y, Turbino M. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:571-578.
  • 2. David JR, Gomes OM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of exposure time on curing efficiency of polymerizing units equipped with light-emitting diodes. J Oral Sci. 2007; 49:19-24.
  • 3. Jeong T-S, Kang H-S, Kim S-K, Kim S, Kim H-I, Kwon YH. The effect of resin shades on microhardness, polymerization shrinkage, and color change of dental composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:438-445.
  • 4. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29:1165-1173.
  • 5. Fan P, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133:429-434.
  • 6. Chong S, Lam Y, Lee F, Ramalingam L, Yeo A, Lim C. Effect of various infection control methods for light-cure units on the cure of composite resins. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:150-154.
  • 7. Warren DP, Rice H, Powers J. Intensity of curing lights affected by barriers. J Dent Hyg. 2000; 74:20-23.
  • 8. Autio KL, Rosen S, Reynolds NJ, Bright JS. Studies on cross-contamination in the dental clinic. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100:358-361.
  • 9. Caughman GB, Caughman WF, Napier N, Schuster G. Disinfection of visible-lightcuring devices. Oper Dent. 1989; 14:2-7.
  • 10. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Comer RW. The effect of autoclaving on energy transmission through light-curing tips. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127:1183-1187.
  • 11. Rueggeberg F, Caughman WF. Factors affecting light transmission of single-use, plastic light-curing tips. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:179-184.
  • 12. Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RB. Effect of disposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004; 70:105-110.
  • 13. Nelson SK, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE. Effect of glutaraldehyde cold sterilants on light transmission of curing tips. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28:725-730.
  • 14. Pollington S, Kahakachchi N, van Noort R. The influence of plastic light cure sheaths on the hardness of resin composite. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:741-745.
  • 15. Hodson NA, Dunne SM, Pankhurst CL. The effect of infection-control barriers on the light intensity of light-cure units and depth of cure of composite. Prim Dent Care. 2005; 12:61-67.
  • 16. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhães DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater. 2001; 17:309-315.
  • 17. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85:386-395.
  • 18. Baharav H, Abraham D, Cardash H, Helft M. Effect of exposure time on the depth of polymerization of a visible light‐cured composite resin. J Oral Rehabil. 1988; 15:167- 172.
  • 19. Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:726-732.
  • 20. Peutzfeldt A. Correlation between recordings obtained with a light‐intensity tester and degree of conversion of a light‐curing resin. Eur J Oral Sci. 1994; 102:73-75.
  • 21. Şakar‐Deliormanli A, Güden M. Microhardness and fracture toughness of dental materials by indentation method. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, The Australian Society for Biomaterials, The Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006; 76:257-264.
  • 22. Rouhollahi M, Mohammadibasir M, Talim S. Comparative depth of cure among two light-cured core build-up composites by surface vickers hardness. J Dent. 2012; 9:255-261.
  • 23. Ülker HE, Yalçın M, Cebe F, Şengün A. Farklı Kompozit Materyallerinin İki Değişik Renginin Vickers Mikrosertliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 11:92-96.
  • 24. Deb S, Sehmi H. A comparative study of the properties of dental resin composites polymerized with plasma and halogen light. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:517-522.
  • 25. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Chan DC. Novel approach to measure composite conversion kinetics during exposure with stepped or continuous light‐curing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1999; 11:197-205.
  • 26. McAndrew R, Lynch C, Pavli M, Bannon A, Milward P. The effect of disposable infection control barriers and physical damage on the power output of light curing units and light curing tips. Br Dent J. 2011; 210:E12.
  • 27. Saipullaev M, Erdemir U, Yildiz E. Influence of Bulk Thickness, Curing Time, and Curing Unit Type on the Microhardness of Different-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composites. Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2018; 54:675-684.
  • 28. Bouschlicher M, Rueggeberg F, Wilson B. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:698-704.
  • 29. Andrzejewska E. Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci. 2001; 26:605-665.
  • 30. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Post-irradiation hardness development, chemical softening, and thermal stability of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites. J Dent. 2015; 43:209-218.
  • 31. Mohamad D, Young R, Mann A, Watts D. Post-polymerization of dental resin composite evaluated with nanoindentation and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Archives of Orofacial Sciences 2007; 2:26-31.
  • 32. Truffier-Boutry D, Demoustier-Champagne S, Devaux J, Biebuyck J-J, Mestdagh M, Larbanois P, et al. A physico-chemical explanation of the post-polymerization shrinkage in dental resins. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:405-412.
  • 33. Watts D, Amer O, Combe E. Surface hardness development in light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 1987; 3:265-269.
  • 34. Øysæd H, Ruyter I. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res. 1986; 65:1315-1318.
  • 35. Price RB, Derand T, Sedarous M, Andreou P, Loney RW. Effect of distance on the power density from two light guides. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2000; 12:320-327.
  • 36. Aravamudhan K, Rakowski D, Fan P. Variation of depth of cure and intensity with distance using LED curing lights. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:988-994.

Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 393 - 398, 27.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of disposable sheaths on microhardness of resin composites.
Methods: A total of 40 resin composite specimens were fabricated with perspex molds (5x2 mm). Specimens were divided into 4 groups: Irradiated by 1-Elipar LCU only (EL), 2-Elipar LCU with sheath (ELS), 3-Valo LCU only (VL), 4-Valo LCU with sheath (VLS), (n=10). The specimens were subjected to surface microhardness (SMH) test (Tronic, Digital Microhardness Tester DHV-1000) on the top and bottom surfaces under 200 g load applied for 10 s with a Vickers indenter. The specimens were stored in the distilled water at 37 °C for 24 hours and the same measurements were repeated. One-way ANOVA test, Tukey and Tamhane post-hoc tests were used for intergroup comparisons. Also paired sample t-test was used for comparisons of the different time results.
Results: According to the 1st-hour data from the top and bottom SMH measurements, EL and VL groups gave significantly higher microhardness values than VLS and ELS groups (p<0.05). There was a dependent change in the top surface measurements with the time (p=0.000), but also interaction with the LCU (p=0.000). All groups showed significant microhardness loss from 1st to 24th-hour for both top and bottom values (p<0.05) except for top SMH of VLS group (p=0.151).
Conclusion: Disposable sheaths decreased the light output of the LCU’s and caused reduction in the SMH. Although they are effective in preventing cross-infection, they significantly reduced the polymerization efficiency, thereby mechanical properties of resin composites.

References

  • 1. Rode K, Kawano Y, Turbino M. Evaluation of curing light distance on resin composite microhardness and polymerization. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:571-578.
  • 2. David JR, Gomes OM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of exposure time on curing efficiency of polymerizing units equipped with light-emitting diodes. J Oral Sci. 2007; 49:19-24.
  • 3. Jeong T-S, Kang H-S, Kim S-K, Kim S, Kim H-I, Kwon YH. The effect of resin shades on microhardness, polymerization shrinkage, and color change of dental composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:438-445.
  • 4. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29:1165-1173.
  • 5. Fan P, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133:429-434.
  • 6. Chong S, Lam Y, Lee F, Ramalingam L, Yeo A, Lim C. Effect of various infection control methods for light-cure units on the cure of composite resins. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:150-154.
  • 7. Warren DP, Rice H, Powers J. Intensity of curing lights affected by barriers. J Dent Hyg. 2000; 74:20-23.
  • 8. Autio KL, Rosen S, Reynolds NJ, Bright JS. Studies on cross-contamination in the dental clinic. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 100:358-361.
  • 9. Caughman GB, Caughman WF, Napier N, Schuster G. Disinfection of visible-lightcuring devices. Oper Dent. 1989; 14:2-7.
  • 10. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Comer RW. The effect of autoclaving on energy transmission through light-curing tips. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127:1183-1187.
  • 11. Rueggeberg F, Caughman WF. Factors affecting light transmission of single-use, plastic light-curing tips. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:179-184.
  • 12. Scott BA, Felix CA, Price RB. Effect of disposable infection control barriers on light output from dental curing lights. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004; 70:105-110.
  • 13. Nelson SK, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE. Effect of glutaraldehyde cold sterilants on light transmission of curing tips. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28:725-730.
  • 14. Pollington S, Kahakachchi N, van Noort R. The influence of plastic light cure sheaths on the hardness of resin composite. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:741-745.
  • 15. Hodson NA, Dunne SM, Pankhurst CL. The effect of infection-control barriers on the light intensity of light-cure units and depth of cure of composite. Prim Dent Care. 2005; 12:61-67.
  • 16. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhães DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater. 2001; 17:309-315.
  • 17. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85:386-395.
  • 18. Baharav H, Abraham D, Cardash H, Helft M. Effect of exposure time on the depth of polymerization of a visible light‐cured composite resin. J Oral Rehabil. 1988; 15:167- 172.
  • 19. Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Influence of placement techniques on Vickers and Knoop hardness of class II composite resin restorations. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:726-732.
  • 20. Peutzfeldt A. Correlation between recordings obtained with a light‐intensity tester and degree of conversion of a light‐curing resin. Eur J Oral Sci. 1994; 102:73-75.
  • 21. Şakar‐Deliormanli A, Güden M. Microhardness and fracture toughness of dental materials by indentation method. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, The Australian Society for Biomaterials, The Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006; 76:257-264.
  • 22. Rouhollahi M, Mohammadibasir M, Talim S. Comparative depth of cure among two light-cured core build-up composites by surface vickers hardness. J Dent. 2012; 9:255-261.
  • 23. Ülker HE, Yalçın M, Cebe F, Şengün A. Farklı Kompozit Materyallerinin İki Değişik Renginin Vickers Mikrosertliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 11:92-96.
  • 24. Deb S, Sehmi H. A comparative study of the properties of dental resin composites polymerized with plasma and halogen light. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:517-522.
  • 25. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Chan DC. Novel approach to measure composite conversion kinetics during exposure with stepped or continuous light‐curing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1999; 11:197-205.
  • 26. McAndrew R, Lynch C, Pavli M, Bannon A, Milward P. The effect of disposable infection control barriers and physical damage on the power output of light curing units and light curing tips. Br Dent J. 2011; 210:E12.
  • 27. Saipullaev M, Erdemir U, Yildiz E. Influence of Bulk Thickness, Curing Time, and Curing Unit Type on the Microhardness of Different-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composites. Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2018; 54:675-684.
  • 28. Bouschlicher M, Rueggeberg F, Wilson B. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:698-704.
  • 29. Andrzejewska E. Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci. 2001; 26:605-665.
  • 30. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Post-irradiation hardness development, chemical softening, and thermal stability of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites. J Dent. 2015; 43:209-218.
  • 31. Mohamad D, Young R, Mann A, Watts D. Post-polymerization of dental resin composite evaluated with nanoindentation and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Archives of Orofacial Sciences 2007; 2:26-31.
  • 32. Truffier-Boutry D, Demoustier-Champagne S, Devaux J, Biebuyck J-J, Mestdagh M, Larbanois P, et al. A physico-chemical explanation of the post-polymerization shrinkage in dental resins. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:405-412.
  • 33. Watts D, Amer O, Combe E. Surface hardness development in light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 1987; 3:265-269.
  • 34. Øysæd H, Ruyter I. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res. 1986; 65:1315-1318.
  • 35. Price RB, Derand T, Sedarous M, Andreou P, Loney RW. Effect of distance on the power density from two light guides. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2000; 12:320-327.
  • 36. Aravamudhan K, Rakowski D, Fan P. Variation of depth of cure and intensity with distance using LED curing lights. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:988-994.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Meltem Tekbaş Atay 0000-0002-1762-830X

Mediha Büyükgöze Dindar 0000-0003-3794-4366

Neslihan Ozveren 0000-0002-1090-5415

Publication Date September 27, 2021
Submission Date June 13, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Tekbaş Atay, M., Büyükgöze Dindar, M., & Ozveren, N. (2021). Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11(3), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555
AMA Tekbaş Atay M, Büyükgöze Dindar M, Ozveren N. Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. September 2021;11(3):393-398. doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555
Chicago Tekbaş Atay, Meltem, Mediha Büyükgöze Dindar, and Neslihan Ozveren. “Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11, no. 3 (September 2021): 393-98. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555.
EndNote Tekbaş Atay M, Büyükgöze Dindar M, Ozveren N (September 1, 2021) Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11 3 393–398.
IEEE M. Tekbaş Atay, M. Büyükgöze Dindar, and N. Ozveren, “Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites”, Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 393–398, 2021, doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555.
ISNAD Tekbaş Atay, Meltem et al. “Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 11/3 (September 2021), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555.
JAMA Tekbaş Atay M, Büyükgöze Dindar M, Ozveren N. Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021;11:393–398.
MLA Tekbaş Atay, Meltem et al. “Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites”. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, 2021, pp. 393-8, doi:10.33808/clinexphealthsci.752555.
Vancouver Tekbaş Atay M, Büyükgöze Dindar M, Ozveren N. Effect of Disposable Sheaths on the Vickers Microhardness of Resin Composites. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021;11(3):393-8.

14639   14640