Perceptions of Turkish Nursing Students on Nursing Diagnose

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 885 - 891, 30.12.2022

Münevver Sönmez Öznur Gürlek Kısacık

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.951967

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine how Turkish nursing students’ perceived nursing diagnosis.
Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 655 nursing students in the Departments of Nursing in the Health Sciences Faculties of two universities, in the Aegean and western Black Sea Region, between 15 February and 5 April 2020. The Students Information Form and Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Scale were used for data collection. The independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni-correction were used to determine the differences between the groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the effects of independent variables
Results: The mean age of the nursing students was 21.12±1.39; 76.6% of them were female and 36.8% were in the second-year. 53.7% of the nursing students reported that they had difficulty in making nursing diagnoses. The overall Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey score of the nursing students was found to be 2.46±051. Statistically significant difference was found between Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Survey scores in terms of gender (p=0.012), the necessity of nursing diagnosis (p<0.001), and having sufficient knowledge about nursing diagnosis (p=0.019).
Conclusions: The findings of this study have revealed that Turkish nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses are positive. It is important that use effective teaching methods in teaching nursing diagnoses in fundamental nursing education, to give more importance to nursing diagnoses. It is recommended to plan qualitative studies to in-depth examine students’ perceptions with randomized controlled studies involving innovative educational interventions in the future

Keywords

Nursing diagnosis, nursing students, Perceptions of Nursing Diagnosis Scale

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

Bu çalışma proje değildir.

Thanks

Acknowledgments We sincerely thank all the nursing students who agreed to participate in the study.

References

• [1] D’Agostino F, Pancani L, Romero-Sánchez JM, Lumillo-Gutierrez I, Paloma-Castro O, Vellone E, Alvaro R. Nurses’ beliefs about nursing diagnosis: A study with cluster analysis. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74(6):1359-1370.
• [2] Halverson EL, Beetcher EL, Scherb CA, Olsen G, Frost M, Orth K. Minnesota nurses’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses. Int J Nurs Knowl 2011; 22(3): 123-132.
• [3] Hakverdioğlu Yönt GH, Khorshid L, Eşer İ. Examination of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students and their opinions about nursing diagnoses. Int J Nurs Knowl 2009;20(4):162-168.
• [4] Zhang T, Wu X, Peng G, Zhang Q, Chen L, Cai Z, Ou H. Effectiveness of standardized nursing terminologies for nursing practice and healthcare outcomes: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Knowl 2021; https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12315
• [5] Türk G, Tuğrul E, Şahbaz M. Determination of nursing diagnoses used by students in the first clinical practice. Int J Nurs Knowl 2013; 24(3):129-133.https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.2047-3095.2013.01243.x
• [6] Akın-Korhan E, Yönt GH, Erdemir F, Müller-Staub M. Nursing diagnosis in intensive care unit: The Turkey experience. Crit Care Nurs Q 2014; 37(2): 219-224.
• [7] Carpenito-Moyet LJ. F. Erdemir F, Editor. Nursing diagnosis handbook. İstanbul; Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri Ltd. Şti; 2012.p. 1–26).
• [8] Sanson G, Vellone E, Kangasniemi M, Alvaro R, D’Agostino F. Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26 (23-24): 3764-3783.
• [9] Cardenas-Valladolid J, Salinero-Fort MA, Gómez-Campelo P, De Burgos-Lunar C, Abanades-Herranz JC, Arnal-Selfa R, Lopez Andres A. Effectiveness of standardized nursing care plans in health outcomes in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:A two-year prospective follow-up study. PLoS One 2012; 7(8), e43870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043870
• [10] Azzolin K, Mussi CM, Ruschel KB, De Souza EN, De Fátima Lucena A, Rabelo-Silva, ER. Effectiveness of nursing interventions in heart failure patients in home care using NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC. Appl Nurs Res 2013;26(4): 239-244.
• [11] Pérez Rivas FJ, Martín-Iglesias S, Pacheco del Cerro JL, Minguet Arenas C, Garcia Lopez M, Beamud Lagos, M. Effectiveness of nursing process use in primary care. Int J Nurs Knowl 2016; 27(1):43-48.
• [12] Leslie, JL. Employment of the nursing process to facilitate recovery from surgery: A Case Study. Online J Issues Nurs 2018; 23(2). ttps://doi.org/ 10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02PPT07
• [13] Karaca T, Aslan S. Effect of ‘nursing terminologies and classifications’ course on nursing students’ perception of nursing diagnosis. Nurse Educ Today 2018; 67:114-117.
• [14] Ozveren H, Ozden D, Gulnar E. Determination of nursing students’ perception states in nursing diagnosis. Int J Caring Sci 2019; 12(2): 1049-1055.
• [15] Abed El-Rahman, M, Al Kalaldeh MT, Malak MZ. Perceptions and attitudes toward NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses: A cross sectional study of Jordanian Nursing Students. Int J Nurs Knowl 2017; 28(1):13-18.
• [16] Freire VES, Lopes MV, Keenan GM, Lopez KD. Nursing students’ diagnostic accuracy using a computer-based clinical scenario simulation. Nurse Educ Today 2018; 71: 240-246.
• [17] Yılmaz FT, Sabanciogullari S, Aldemir K. The opinions of nursing students regarding the nursing process and their levels of proficiency in Turkey. J Caring Sci 2015; 4(4): 265-275.
• [18] Aydin N, Akansel N. Determination of accuracy of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students in their nursing care plans. Int J Caring Sci 2013; 6(2): 252-256.
• [19] Erden S, Deniz S, Arslan S, Yurtseven Ş. Examination of nursing diagnoses levels in surgical diseases nursing lesson practices of nursing students. Van Med J 2018; 25(2): 108-112. (Turkish)
• [20] Frisch NC, Kelley JH. Nursing diagnosis and nursing theory: exploration of factors inhibiting and supporting simultaneous use. Int J Nurs Knowl 2002; 13(2): 53-61.
• [21] Junttila K, Salanterä, S, Hupli M. Perioperative nurses’ attitudes toward the use of nursing diagnoses in documentation. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52(3): 271-280.
• [22] Olsen G, Frost M, Orth K. Nurses’ perception of nursing diagnosis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Nursing Research Society 17th Annual Research Conference 1991; Cleveland, OH.
• [23] Akın-Korhan E, Yönt HG, Bedriye AK, Erdemir F. Analysis of Turkish validity and reliability of perception of nursing diagnosis. HEMAR-G 2013;15(3): 13-15.(Turkish)
• [24] İnangil D, Uzen-Cura Ş. Nursing students’ perceptions of nursing diagnoses and clinical decision-making. Clin Exp Health Sci 2020; 10(2): 131-136.
• [25] Ogunfowokan AA, Oluwatosin AO, Olajubu AO, Alao OA, Faremi, AF. Student nurses’ perceived use of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses in the community setting. Int J Nurs Knowl 2013; 24(1): 37-43.
• [26] Ojo IO, Adejumo PO, Olaogun AAE, & Oyediran OO. Perception of nursing student about integrating standardized nursing language into the nursing curriculum at two Nigerian Universities. Int J Afr Nurs Sci 2020; 12: 100192. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100192
• [27] Güven ŞD, Calpbinici P, Kuzgun H, Çelik GK. Does writing patient care daily effects on critical thinking? A pilot study with 1st year nursing students. Think Skills Creat 2020; 35: 100638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100638
• [28] Hakverdioğlu Yönt, G, Korhan EA, Erdemir F, Müller‐Staub M. Nursing diagnoses determined by first year students: a vignette study. Int J Nurs Knowl 2014; 25(1): 39-42.
• [29] Noh HK, Lee E. Relationships among NANDA-I diagnoses, nursing outcomes classification, and nursing interventions classification by nursing students for patients in Medical Surgical Units in Korea. Int J Nurs Knowl 2015; 26(1): 43-51.
• [30] Uysal N, Arslan GG, Yılmaz İ, Alp FY. Analysis of collected data and of nursing diagnosis in care plan second year nursing students’. CBU-SBED 2016; 3(1): 39-143. (Turkish)
• [31] Zaybak A, Özdemir H, Erol A, Ismailoğlu EG. An exploration of nursing students’ clinical decision-making process. Int J Nurs Knowl 2017; 29(4): 210-216.
• [32] Muller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin A, Van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: Results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes implementation study. Int J Nurs Knowl 2007; 18(1): 5–17.
• [33] Thoroddsen A, Ehnfors M. Nursing specialty knowledge as expressed by standardized nursing languages. Int J Nurs Knowl 2010; 21(2): 69– 79.
• [34] Orkun N, Çınar Yücel Ş. The examination of nursing students’ cases using the diagnosis of comfort corruption. HSP 2017; 4(3):162-70. (Turkish)
• [35] Huang GC, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011. Teach Learn Med 2014; 26(1): 95-102.
• [36] Zhang C, Fan H, Xia J, Guo H, Jiang X, Yan Y. The effects of reflective training on the disposition of critical thinking for nursing students in China: A controlled trial. Asian Nurs Res 2017; 11(3):194-200.
• [37] Paans W, Nieweg RM, Van der Schans CP, Sermeus W. What factors influence the prevalence and accuracy of nursing diagnoses documentation in clinical practice? A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20 (17): 2386–2403.
• [38] Tesoro M. Effects of using developing nurses’ thinking model on accuracy of nursing diagnosis. J Nurs Educ 2012; 51:436– 443.
• [39] Collins A. Effect of continuing nursing education on nurses’ attitude toward and accuracy of nursing diagnosis. Int J Nurs Knowl 2013; 24(3):122-128.
• [40] Lumillo-Gutierrez I, Romero-Sánchez JM, D’Agostino F, Paramio-Cuevas JC, Fabrella N, Moreno-Corral LJ, Paloma Castro O. Nurses’ characteristics and practice environments: Comparison between clusters with different attitude and utilisation profiles regarding nursing diagnosis. J Nurs Manag 2019; 27(1): 93-102.
• [41] Olivia APV, Lopes DDA, Volpato MP, Hayashi AAM. Positions on nursing diagnosis: Attitudes of nurses and nursing students. Acta Paul Enferm 2005; 18(4):361– 367.
• [42] Karadağlı F. Students’ professional value perception and affecting factors.MSU Journal of Health Sciences 2016; 9(2):81- 91. (Turkish)
• [43] Cerit B, Temelli G. Examination of professional behaviors according to the gender and grade level in nursing students. J Health Nurs Manag 2018; 5(3):164-171. (Turkish