Digital Comparison of Occlusal Vertical Contacts Between Direct Composite and Indirect Cad/Cam Restorations: An in vivo quantitative assessment

Year 2024, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 501 - 509, 28.06.2024

Bora Korkut Ezgi Tüter Bayraktar Ayşe Aslı Şenol Emine Uyar Canfeda Yeler Gülçin Yazıcı

https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1400916

Abstract

Objective: Clinical assessment of the static occlusal vertical contacts for direct composite and indirect Cad/Cam restorations, and evaluation of the clinical experience level's effect on contact registration.
Methods: Sixty restorations on maxillary and mandibular molar teeth were investigated. Postgraduate students performed indirect Cad/Cam restorations (Cerasmart, GC Corp., n=20), and both undergraduate and postgraduate students performed direct composite restorations (Ganeial A’chord, GC Corp., n=20 for each). A single supervisor digitally analyzed the occlusal vertical contacts immediately after by using an intraoral scanner (iTero Element-5D, AlignTech) and OrthoCAD software. The tightness of contacts was assessed by counting the pixel numbers in Photoshop CC (Adobe) software. The statistical analyses were performed by Shapiro-Wilk, One-way ANOVA, Tamhane’s T2 test, Kruska-Wallis test, and Dunn tests (p<.05).
Results: No significant differences were found for the contacts closer than the yellow code (<0.4mm) among the operator/restoration types (≥.05). Whereas, significant differences were found between the undergraduate direct and postgraduate indirect restorations for the yellow contacts and the lighter ones (p<.05). Additionally, no significant contact differences were found either between the direct restorations of undergraduate and postgraduate students or between the direct and indirect restorations of postgraduate students (p≥.05 for both). Considering red, orange, and yellow code contact types together, no significant differences were observed among the operator and restoration types (p=.069).
Conclusion: The restoration type was not effective in registering the occlusal vertical contacts for clinicians with equal clinical experience levels. Clinical experience was also not effective in occlusal contacts of direct restorations. Whereas, when the advantages of indirect Cad/Cam restorations are combined with the clinical experience, tighter occlusal vertical contacts might be registered. The potential effects of additional parameters such as the restorative material and the dental technician on the occlusal vertical contacts should be investigated.

Keywords

Clinical experience, cad/cam, direct restoration, indirect restoration, occlusion, vertical contacts

References

• Ferro KJ, Morgano SM, Driscoll CF, Freilich MA, Guckes AD, Knoernschild KL, McGarry TJ. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2017;117(5):e1-e105. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001
• Wiechens B, Brockmeyer P, Wassmann T, Rödiger M, Wiessner A, Bürgers R. Time of day-dependent deviations in dynamic and static occlusion: A prospective clinical study The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.025
• Bostancıoğlu SE, Toğay A, Tamam E. Comparison of two different digital occlusal analysis methods Clinical Oral Investigations 2022;26(2):2095-2109. DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-04191-1
• Pyakurel U, Long H, Jian F, Sun J, Zhu Y, Jha H, Lai W. Mechanism, accuracy and application of T-Scan system in dentistry-a review. Journal of Nepal Dental Association 2013;13(1):52-56.
• Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: A literature review European Journal of Dentistry. 2010;4(2):223-232. DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1697833
• Filtchev AD, Kalachev YS. Phenomenon of domination of the strongest contacts in centric occlusion Quintessence International. 2008;39(3):99-106.
• Azeem RA, Sureshbabu NM. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2018;21(1):2-9. DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_213_16
• Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dental Materials Journal 2009;28(5):620-626. DOI:10.4012/dmj.28.620
• Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Rueters FJM, Cruegers NHJ, Burgersdijk RCW. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2006;19(4):349-354.
• Riede U, Wai S, Neururer S, Reistenhofer B, Riede G, Besser K, Crismani A. Maxillary expansion or contraction and occlusal contact adjustment: Effectiveness of current aligner treatment. Clinical Oral Investigations 2021;25(7):4671-4679. DOI:10.1007/s00784-021-03780-4
• Bulycheva D, Bulycheva YA. Applying the diagnostic scanner "T-Scan" to analyze the occlusion relationships of the dentitions in the prosthodontist’s practice. In International Scientific and Practical Conference. The World Science 2015;2(4):13-14.
• Zarrati S, Mahboub F. Marginal adaptation of indirect composite, glass-ceramic inlays and direct composite: An in vitro evaluation Journal of Dentistry (Tehran) 2010;7(2):77-83.
• Zaruba M, Mehl A. Chairside systems: A current review. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2017;20(2):123-149.
• Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion-E-book Elsevier Health Science 2019. DOI:10.2478/aoj-1994-0029
• Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. St. Louis: Mosby. In: Elsevier. 2007.
• Saraçoğlu A Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002;88(5):522-526. DOI:10.1067/mpr.2002.129064
• Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJY, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2012;4(1):7-12. DOI:10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7
• Majithia IP, Arora V, Anil Kumar S, Saxena V, Mittal MM. Comparison of articulating paper markings and T Scan III recordings to evaluate occlusal force in normal and rehabilitated maxillofacial trauma patients. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 2015;71(2):382-388. DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.09.014
• Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Journal of Craniomandibular Practice 2014;32(1):13-23. DOI:10.1179/0886963413Z.0000000001
• Abdulateef S, Edher F, Hannam AG, Tobias DL, Wyatt CCL. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2020;124(6):667-673. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.014
• Arslan Y, Karakoca Nemli S, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Tamam E, Yılmaz H. Evaluation of biogeneric design techniques with CEREC CAD/CAM system. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2015;7(6):431-436. DOI:10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.431.
• Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps AI. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2019;121(5):811-820. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.020.
• Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps I. Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 2018;10(4):361-366. DOI:10.4317/jced.54670.
• Diker B, Tak Ö. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2022;128(2):187-194. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.007.
• Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2017;118(1):36-42. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024.
• Davies S, Gray RM. What is occlusion? British Dental Journal 2001;191(5):235-241. DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801151a.
• Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Evolution of occlusion and occlusal instruments. Journal of Prosthodontics 1993;2(1):33-43. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00379.x.
• Testa M, Di Marco A, Pertusio R, Van Roy P, Cattrysse E, Roatta S. A validation study of a new instrument for low cost bite force measurement. Journal of Electromyography Kinesiology 2016;30:243-248. DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.08.005.
• Haralur S, Al-Gadhaan S, Al-Qahtani A, Mossa A, Al-Shehri WA, Addas MK. Influence of functional head postures on the dynamic functional occlusal parameters. Annals of Medical and Health Science Research 2014;4(4):562-566. DOI:10.4103/2141-9248.139319.
• Peng Z, Liu C, Zhang L, Li W, Hu W, Ma S, Xia Q. A simple method for the cross-section area determination of single profiled fibers and its application microscopy and microanalysis. 2018;24(1):17-28. DOI:10.1017/S1431927618000028.
• Datta U, Chakroboarty. Fast and accurate method for estimation of leaf area index by image processing system: An innovative concept. Pharmacy and Innovations Journal 2018;7(8):401-404.
• Park YH, Kim KA, Lee JJ, Kwon T, Seo JM. Effect of abutment neck taper and cement types on the amount of remnant cement in cement-retained implant restorations: An in vitro study. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2022;14(3):162-172. DOI:10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.162.
• Hidalgo J, Baghernejad D, Falk A, Larsson C. The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns: An in vitro study. BDJ Open. 2021;7(1):5. DOI:10.1038/s41405-021-00063-8.
• Zhai Y, Xu M, Dimopoulos IS, Birch DG, Bernstein BS, Holt J, Kirn D, Francis P, Mcdonald IM. Quantification of RPE changes in choroideremia using a photoshop-based method. Translational Vision Science and Technology 2020;9(7):21. DOI:10.1167/tvst.9.7.21.
• Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Palmer L, English J. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2002;121(6):602-609. DOI:10.1067/mod.2002.122829.
• Kollmuss M, Kist S, Goeke JE, Hickel R, Huth KC. Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology, occlusion, and aesthetics. Clinical Oral Investigations 2016;20(4):791-797. DOI:10.1007/s00784-015-1554-9.
• Pan Y, Lin H, Wang Y, Jiang L, Cheng Y, Yu H, Cheng H. Comparison of occlusal contact errors of 6 chairside CAD/CAM crowns: A self-controlled clinical study. Clinical Oral Investigations 2023;27(3):1301-1310. DOI:10.1007/s00784-022-04764-8.
• Lippert VF, Andrade JP, Spohr AM, Kunrath MF. Complete oral rehabilitation with direct and indirect composite resins: A minimally invasive approach on severely compromised teeth. Quintessence International 2022;53(10):824-831. DOI:10.3290/j.qi.b3315033.
• Angeletaki F, Gkogkos A, Papazoglou E, Kloukos D. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis The Journal Dentistry 2016;53:12-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011.