Research Article

PUTRESCINE AS A PROTECTIVE MOLECULE ON DNA DAMAGE AND DNA METHYLATION CHANGES IN WHEAT UNDER DROUGHT

Volume: 28 Number: 2 December 15, 2019
EN

PUTRESCINE AS A PROTECTIVE MOLECULE ON DNA DAMAGE AND DNA METHYLATION CHANGES IN WHEAT UNDER DROUGHT

Abstract

The world suffers with the agricultural drought stress which leading to decreasing crop production, and also adversely affecting cereals on morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular levels. However, exogenous treatment of some osmotically active materials like putrescine has been regarded as a good preventive against these harmful effects of drought. But there is a lack of information on putrescine has any effects on DNA damage and DNA methylation in crops. The current study was goal to determine DNA damage levels and DNA methylation changes in Triticum aestivum cv. Karasu 90 subjected to different concentrations of drought (-2, -4, -6 bar PEG) and whether putrescine (0.01, 0.1, 1 mM) has any ameliorative effect on these changes is determined with RAPDs and CRED-RAs tecniques. In addition, total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) values were investigated based on drought and putrescine treatments. The findings showed that drought stress caused DNA damage and DNA methylation changes. However, these effects decreased after putrescine treatments. Putrescine has been shown to decrease oxidative damage caused by drought via increasing antioxidant status in drought stress. According to results, it was concluded that putrescine could be preferred for its force to protect wheat DNA from the damaging effects of drought and the demethylation positively contributed to drought stress tolerance.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Ataturk University

Project Number

2011/355

References

  1. Alzahrani Y, Kuşvuran, A, Alharby HF, Kuşvuran S, Rady, MM (2018). The defensive role of silicon in wheat against stress conditions induced bydrought, salinity or cadmium. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 154: 187-196.
  2. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48: 909-930.
  3. Dutta S, Mitra M, Agarwal P, Mahapatra K, De Sayanti Sett U, Roy S (2018). Oxidative and genotoxic damages in plants in response to heavy metal stress and maintenance of genome stability. Plant Signaling and Behaviour 13: 1-17.
  4. Gratão PL, Polle A, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA (2005). Making the life of heavy metal-stressed plants a little easier. Functional Plant Biology 32: 481-494.
  5. Grativol C, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PCG (2012). Genetic and epigenetic regulation of stress responses in natural plant populations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819: 176-185.
  6. Kumar M, Bijo AJ, Baghel RS, Reddy CRK, Bhavanath J (2012). Selenium and spermine alleviate cadmium induced toxicity in the red seaweed Gracilaria dura by regulating antioxidants and DNA methylation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 51: 129-138.
  7. Tan MP (2010). Analysis of DNA methylation of maize in response to osmotic and salt stress based on methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48: 21-26.
  8. Kaur A, Grewal A, Sharma P (2018). Comparative analysis of DNA methylation changes in two contrasting wheat genotypes under water deficit. Biologia Plantarum 62: 471-478.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Structural Biology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 15, 2019

Submission Date

July 7, 2019

Acceptance Date

September 18, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 28 Number: 2

Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License